|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {{Promotions Intro}} | | {{:A/PM/Intro}} |
| ==Candidates still requiring vouches==
| |
| <!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
| |
| ''There are no promotion bids requiring vouches.''
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Candidates currently under community discussion== | | ==Candidates Being Discussed== |
| ===[[User:Lithedarkangel]]===
| | <!--- |
|
| |
|
| Li was always a wiki lover. He is a good guy, has been around for almost a year, and has never been warned. He plays a prominent role in current [[Location Nuts|Wiki]] [[The Status Reporters|Projects]].He is a total achiever, and if he was given System Operator abilities, he could really make use of his talents. He tries his best to avoid all wiki drama as well. If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him. That just wouldn't be fair.
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Lithedarkangel
| | !---> |
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| If anyone has any questions, I'm sure Li will be able to answer them as soon as he sees this (he stalks the recent changes page.) --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| | ==Recent Bids== |
|
| |
|
| | ===[[User:Hagnat]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]]. |
|
| |
|
| '''Response:''' I'm honored for the proposal, thanks hal. I accept this nomination. Now with the responses...
| | ===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]]. |
|
| |
|
| ''Popularity:''I agree I'm not that popular on the wiki... maybe because I'm not part of vandalism.
| | ==Archived Bids== |
| | | ''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:'' |
| ''Drama?:'' About that bit... It's mostly because I do other stuff. Of course that being a Sysop will require with me dealing with that kind of situations and I have no problem with that. Furthermore, I have a great patience when dealing with drama.
| | *[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]] |
| | | *[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]] |
| ''Vandalizing:'' Me?... Nice one... I would never do such a thing... really... if I do.. ban me.
| | *[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities |
| | |
| ''Sysop?:'' Well, it will help with all the administration I have to wait for. I can help with that work too.
| |
| | |
| ''Conflict of interest:'' Concerning the conflict with my group. I must say I would never attempt to do anything not approved by the rules.
| |
| | |
| I hope this is enough...If not keep asking.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 02:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -----
| |
| | |
| *'''Vouch''' - Obviously :) --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 00:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - "''If you don't know who he is, please abstain, and don't vote against him.''" I'll do whatever the hell I like, buddy. Sysop candidates should be well-known figures as the public spotlight will always be on them once they're promoted and going from obscurity straight into that kind of environment isn't a good thing. Besides, there's nothing he's doing that requires sysop abilities and functions that ''do'' require said abilities aren't difficult in any sense of the word. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch, because agreeing with a troll is badd. (Seriously though, this is an Against, and anyone that perceives it otherwise is stupid)''' - Needs moar experience and renown. I should be able to come back from a multi-month long break and know who you are within a few weeks.--[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - Firstly, you should contact him first and get him to come here and say he wants to be a sysop, otherwise you won't get much support. Secondly, I think Lithe's work in the last few weeks has been awesome, and being a sysop could allow him to skip pointless bureaucracy and do what he needs to do. The only real problem i have is this thing about avoiding drama, i don't see that as a good trait, a/vb and a/m are natural drama machines and i don't think we need more sysops who are happy to not get involved in those areas. If he comes over and makes a statement i might be inclined to change my view, not that you really want my support anyway, coz we all know what that'll do to boxy's opinion of you.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:lol bias. :D --[[User:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>]] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 00:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *:My, someone's feeling a little sore. --[[User:Cyberbob240|HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS]] 01:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - I like Li, I think he's a great guy, but he's just not prominent enough, and he doesn't need op privileges to do what he's doing now. I'm abstaining until I see evidence that sways me one way or another. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Provisional Abstain''' - The user needs to indicate a desire to be a sysop, they havn't on this page and cannot be promoted until they do. Also I'd be wary of the conflict of interest given their group's recent and on going wiki drama. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - To be fair, the UBCS has <u>never</u> vandalized an Umbrella page. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 01:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::You'll notice I say conflict of interest and not potential vandalism concerns. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 01:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''who?''' - i guess cyberbob already said it, potential sysops should be users known by the public. I never heard of this guy (or girl), and by the looks of the others ''votes'' in here, i am not alone in that. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] [[Special:Listusers/sysop|mod]]</sup> 01:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:onoze ur agreein wit a troll!11111 --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 02:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *::Potential sysops might want to be known by the other sysops, too. I don't recognize this name at all.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - As Pestolence. He's a great guy, but doesn't need sysop powers just yet. Iscariot has a point over COI. I'm not saying that you would, but I wouldn't want you voting on A/VB with such a conflict. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 02:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - Then... If you think my judgment could be affected I would not take part of that actions until this conflict is over.--{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 06:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::Really, it was only a small part in abstaining. If you left it another six months, kept up with your current level of activity, and participated in policy discussions more, then I wouldn't have a problem in vouching. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 07:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::What Link said. Come back in a few months. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' Needs time and visibility. [[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 04:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Needs moar drama, and atleast 1 arbies --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 06:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re:''' - I could go messing with your pages... joking... is that really against? -{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 06:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Hello all! I return from the dark depths of hell just to vote against this user! No, I kid but seriously I have never heard of this person and I don't see any great contributions of his that are that are sysop worthy.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 06:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - He's a nice guy and I always see him contributing when I check out recent changes. Li has made some requests on A/SD and A/MR from what I can remember, and I think he would be a great janitorial psyop. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 06:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - As mentioned above.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 07:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:lol bias. :D --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 11:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |
| *::Hey, its a valid vote.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 15:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::First, promotions aren't a vote. Second, it was a joke. :) --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> dǝǝɥs </span>]] <small><span style="color: Crimson">oʇ </span> [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k-QHA-QAMY <span style="color: DarkGreen">ɯɐds:</span>] [http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology/Joining <span style="color: MidnightBlue">sʎɐʍ1ɐ!</span>]</small> 20:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::::Got me there, I always name it voting. Second, I did not mean my words in a harsh way, next time I will put along a corresponding smiley :D.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 20:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' Not having heard of you I can't vouch that I trust your judgement... If sysop status just gave you janitorial powers that would not be an issue but as it gives more than that I am going to have to see more of you in areas where i can gauge you better before I will vouch! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 11:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' Lithe is definitely heading towards sysop status, and does indeed do a lot of those dull things that makes sysops so sysopy. '''However''' I haven't seen a lot of interaction helping new users, discussing rule changes or even on [[developing suggestions]]. Don't take this as a criticism but get out there a bit more! get involved in debates,vote on stuff like [[deletions]] and don't feed those trolls. If you're ever stuck for ideas, just leave me a message. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Question''' - Do you usually watch/read/stalk the A/D, A/SD, A/MR, A/VB etc. Pages? --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 16:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:'''Re''' - Not that much... yes... yes... almost every time... I stalk the RC --{{User:Lithedarkangel/signature}} 01:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::'''Re''' - Thanks. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''': No action in the admin section, as far as I've seen. [[User:Liberty|Liberty]] 03:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - As above: no action in Admin sections. As annoying and often drama-prone as these sections can be, learning the procedural ropes there is essential to being a good sysop. And part of the job.... --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 04:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Yer lack of actual meth use is disturbing... Otherwise as above--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 05:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - but a little weak. You're doing a great job with all those Location Pages, but I haven't seen you around the Admin Sections very much. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - See Hagnat.--[[User:ScouterTX|ScouterTX]] 14:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - As hagnat. By the looks of your contributions, you have a good history, but I'm not sure that it's enough. Maybe sometime else.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 18:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - as above, don't know them, never seen them, and i don't like voting for any one described as a 'good guy'. i like my rule makers to be anal retentive workaholic assholes just looking for an excuse to ban someone. --[[User:Bullgod|Bullgod]] 12:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:You can has Iscariot?--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 12:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::Would be preferred.--[[User:Bullgod|Bullgod]] 16:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - I can vouche that this guy can do a good job with all future wiki affairs. {{User:Met fan/sig}} 19:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''against''' - as bullgod, and the fact that the guy above me misspelled VOUCH. also the lack of marijuana paraphernalia on your user page is disturbing.----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 19:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Who? --[[User:The Hierophant|Papa Moloch]] 01:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' -HE can't even run a simple forum, yet you want to give him power on this wiki? crazy. --[[User:Cap'n'cupcake|Cap'n'cupcake]] 07:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Archived Promotions==
| |
| | |
| *[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
