UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Promotions Intro}}
{{:A/PM/Intro}}
==Candidates still requiring vouches==
===[[User:The Rooster|The Rooster]]===


([[User talk:The Rooster|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The Rooster|Contribs]])
==Candidates Being Discussed==
<!---


I would like to put forward a nomination for The Rooster.
''There are no candidates at this time.''


The Rooster has been here for over 2 years, and since has done a huge amount for this wiki of late. Recent things that I can immediately recall are his help reworking the previously unused [[Community Portal]], the redesign of the Main Page from [http://web.archive.org/web/20070807121922/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Main_Page this] to [[Main Page|this]] (both of these with [[User:A Helpful Little Gnome|AHLG]]), and the re-coding of the [[Suburb|Suburb Dangermap]] system to allow easier maintenance among the community. [[User:The Rooster/Contributions|Here]] is a list of all his other major contributions to the wiki. Accompanying this, Rooster has, for two years, been the creator/maintainer of several bots- click [[User:The Rooster/Bots|here]] to read about them.
!--->
''There are no candidates at this time.''


Rooster's last bid can be read [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/The Rooster|here]], I recommend you read it. I wouldn't have nominated him here if I didn't think Rooster had since become closer to the community since his last bid. My past encounters with Rooster have been dealt with professionally, helpfully and productively, and I know I'm not the only user capable of saying that. Always willing to help new (and old) users, always contactable via [irc://irc.nexuswar.com/urbandeadwiki irc], demonstrating a benchmark in coding knowledge, and always keeping himself busy with admin maintenance tasks, I think Rooster would have much offer to the wiki as a sysop. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 14:50, 27 June 2009 (BST)
==Recent Bids==


*'''Strong Vouch''' At the risk of sounding annoyingly generic, as above. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 15:12, 27 June 2009 (BST)
===[[User:Hagnat]]===
*'''Vouch''' - I trust Rooster immensely, he is completely impartial, ''always'' helps with coding issues when asked, no matter how tough or trivial, and I just think his work could be furthered with those extra buttons. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 15:15, 27 June 2009 (BST)
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]].
*'''Strong Vouch''' - Smart, impartial, dedicated. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 15:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)
*'''Infinite Vouch''' Especially now swiers is so rarely seen. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:42, 27 June 2009 (BST)


==Candidates currently under community discussion==
===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]===
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]].


==Recently Concluded Bids==
==Archived Bids==
 
''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:''
''For more concluded bids, see [[:Category:Promotions Candidacies]].''
*[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]]
 
*[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]]
==Archived Promotions==
*[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities
 
*[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
*[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
*[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]

Latest revision as of 08:31, 14 August 2019

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.

Guidelines for System Operator Requests

Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:

  • Significant time within the community.
We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Significant activity within the community.
We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Prior interest in maintaining the community.
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
  • Desire to become a System Operator.
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).

If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.

Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.

Example Application

Example User

I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.

  • Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)


Candidates Being Discussed

There are no candidates at this time.

Recent Bids

User:Hagnat

User:DanceDanceRevolution

Archived Bids

For earlier promotion bids, see the following: