|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {{Promotions Intro}} | | {{:A/PM/Intro}} |
| ==Candidates still requiring vouches==
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Candidates currently under community discussion== | | ==Candidates Being Discussed== |
| ===[[User:The Rooster|The Rooster]]===
| | <!--- |
|
| |
|
| ([[User talk:The Rooster|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The Rooster|Contribs]])
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| I would like to put forward a nomination for The Rooster.
| | !---> |
| | ''There are no candidates at this time.'' |
|
| |
|
| The Rooster has been here for over 2 years, and since has done a huge amount for this wiki of late. Recent things that I can immediately recall are his help reworking the previously unused [[Community Portal]], the redesign of the Main Page from [http://web.archive.org/web/20070807121922/wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Main_Page this] to [[Main Page|this]] (both of these with [[User:A Helpful Little Gnome|AHLG]]), and the re-coding of the [[Suburb|Suburb Dangermap]] system to allow easier maintenance among the community. [[User:The Rooster/Contributions|Here]] is a list of all his other major contributions to the wiki. Accompanying this, Rooster has, for two years, been the creator/maintainer of several bots- click [[User:The Rooster/Bots|here]] to read about them.
| | ==Recent Bids== |
|
| |
|
| Rooster's last bid can be read [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/The Rooster|here]], I recommend you read it. I wouldn't have nominated him here if I didn't think Rooster had since become closer to the community since his last bid. My past encounters with Rooster have been dealt with professionally, helpfully and productively, and I know I'm not the only user capable of saying that. Always willing to help new (and old) users, always contactable via [irc://irc.nexuswar.com/urbandeadwiki irc], demonstrating a benchmark in coding knowledge, and always keeping himself busy with admin maintenance tasks, I think Rooster would have much offer to the wiki as a sysop. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 14:50, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | ===[[User:Hagnat]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]]. |
|
| |
|
| :Accepted. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 12:00, 28 June 2009 (BST) | | ===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]=== |
| | *[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]]. |
|
| |
|
| *'''Strong Vouch''' At the risk of sounding annoyingly generic, as above. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 15:12, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | ==Archived Bids== |
| *'''Vouch''' - I trust Rooster immensely, he is completely impartial, ''always'' helps with coding issues when asked, no matter how tough or trivial, and I just think his work could be furthered with those extra buttons. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 15:15, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | ''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:'' |
| *'''Strong Vouch''' - Smart, impartial, dedicated. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 15:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | *[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]] |
| *'''Infinite Vouch''' Especially now swiers is so rarely seen. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:42, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | *[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]] |
| *'''Vouch''' - Has done good work so far. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 17:50, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| | *[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities |
| *'''Strong Vouch''' - Oh god I hope he accepts the hell out of the nomination. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' 18:28, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Has been an excellent contributor. I fear for fencesitting on the drama sections though.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 18:57, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *As all of the above. So yea. It's a '''Vouch'''. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} ({{User:Axe Hack/Stat}}) 22:17, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| * '''Vouch'''. I'm not sure how much weight my opinion is, but The Rooster knows what he's doing. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}23:08, 27 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| * '''Vouch''' - cares a lot about the wiki, and has great coding skillz... work a lil more on your graphical skillz and you will be one hell of a programmer. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 23:24, 27 June 2009 (BST) | |
| * '''STRONG VOUCH''' - One of the few users that knows what neutrality really means. Great coding skills. Perfect counter-balance to the Clown that was last installed.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>23:47 27 June 2009</tt>
| |
| *:Perhaps you shouldn't have vouched that 'clown' then. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 01:39, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *::Yes, I vouched him and would do so again. IMO, when we go to Admin High Drama levels, the more [http://gmta.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/evilclown.htm Evil Clowns] that come popping out of the Clown Car the better. More entertainment value. :) However, I would also like to see the SysOp to Clown SysOp ratio maintained at about 50/50.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>01:45 28 June 2009</tt>
| |
| *:::Ah, I thought you meant clown in a negative way. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 02:29, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *:::lmbo --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 04:14, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - A great contributor and an excellent choice to be a sysop. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 00:32, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Strong Vouch''' A Welcome addition...[[User:Conndraka|Conndraka]]<sup>[[Moderation|mod]] [[User_talk:Conndraka|T]][[AZM]] [[Coalition for Fair Tactics|''CFT'']]</sup> 06:01, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Strong Vouch''' A dedicated, impartial contributer and a great choice for sysop. --{{User:Dr Eddie Ashford/Sig}} 11:14, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Swiers''' - we do need a new one.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 20:15, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch/Question''' - His resume speaks for itself, but for the sake of conversation I'd like to hear him speak as well. Why would you like to be a sysop and what would you bring to the wiki if promoted? --{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 20:18, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Strong Vouch''' - As Zombie Lord. --{{User:Paddy Dignam/sig}} 22:43, 28 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - He's helping to keep the phone masts up-to-date, and as a MalTel member I am grateful.--{{User:Labine50/sig}} 02:48, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Don't think I've ever actually talked to you outside of IRC? but the times on there we've spoken you're pretty awesome so --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 04:14, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Hells yes, hells yes.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 04:31, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Dam straight its a vouch!! --[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 10:14, 29 June 2009 (BST) | |
| *'''Vouch''' - He knows stuffs.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 18:12, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - He is a tornado of immense proportions.--[[User:Bonghit420|Bonghit420]] 18:47, 29 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ==Recently Concluded Bids==
| |
| | |
| ''For more concluded bids, see [[:Category:Promotions Candidacies]].'' | |
| | |
| ==Archived Promotions==
| |
| | |
| *[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]] | |
| *[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.
Guidelines for System Operator Requests
Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:
- Significant time within the community.
- We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Significant activity within the community.
- We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
- Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
- Prior interest in maintaining the community.
- We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
- Desire to become a System Operator.
- We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).
If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.
Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.
Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.
Example Application
I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.
- Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
- Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
- Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)
Candidates Being Discussed
There are no candidates at this time.
Recent Bids
Archived Bids
For earlier promotion bids, see the following: