Suggestion:20090627 boom, headshot

	Closed
	This suggestion has finished voting and has been moved to Peer Reviewed.

20090627 boom, headshot

D^ANCED^ANCER^EVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 14:21, 27 June 2009 (BST)

Suggestion type
boom, headshot

Suggestion scope
those pesky vain survivors (plus headshotted zombies)

Suggestion description
Just a small suggestion, I wish to put forward this suggestion where the headpiece sections of clothing in Urban Dead can only get torn/tattered/cracked (for sunnies), if you get Headshotted.

Why? Cause sunnies, nurse's caps and the like deserve to have more longevity on players.

For the more detailed read:

• Headgear will deteriorate at the same rate as before, except instead of a death triggering the tearing/bloodstaining, a headshot will.
• As Boxy says on DS, 9/10 deaths for a zombie are headshots anyway, so it doesn't completely restrict clothes tattering, it just restricts it slightly for Zeds, and theoretically half for Harmans, assuming the average Mhr cow gets headshotted at leased once every time they look for a revive. This aim of this suggestion is essentially to aid Survivor vanity a bit, because they are generally the more clothing-oriented faction (we know the Zombies are generally better than that).
• Other clothing items are unaffected by this and the gameplay otherwise stays the same. Just headgear slot is affected.

Incoming questions kindly answered on talk page.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - Looks like a valid suggestion and there isnt anything wrong with it.--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:32, 27 June 2009 (BST)
2. Keep - As Michaleson. In before non CAPD votes. --_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 20:09, 27 June 2009 (BST)
3. Keep - Makes sense, plus it get tired of the clothing hunt. Chaplain Drakon Macar 21:10, 27 June 2009 (BST)

   Keep - I think I'd rather just see a new Hat Shop on Malton's East Seeide, but this works too.--

   

   | T | BALLS! | 23:38 27 June 2009

4. Keep - If only so I can keep my beret for a little longer. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 08:18, 28 June 2009 (BST)
5. Keep - Naturally. And I agree about the "zombies are less vain" thing. I don't know why, but as a survivor I take much more care with my clothes...--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:47, 28 June 2009 (BST)
6. Keep - As above. Linkthewindow  Talk  13:13, 28 June 2009 (BST)
7. Keep - Purely aesthetical so I really can't see any objections - Zig13 - 29/06/2009 at 14:22(BST)
8. Keep - As DodgerBlue. --Private Mark 00:59, 30 June 2009 (BST)
9. Keep - I see nothing wrong with this --Brian Eetar ^DTD|CFT|GMG 22:37, 1 July 2009 (BST)
10. Keep- Sounds harmless. Nemesis645 17:49, 4 July 2009 (BST)
11. Keep - This would improve the game's "realism", wouldn't it? --Zekkuzu 15:40, 5 July 2009 (GMT -3)
12. Keep - Sounds good to me.--Truezombieboy 10:59, 8 July 2009 (BST)
13. Keep - Sounds great--(x)Alvaromesa^{Talk | Bacardi |MPD | Malton Public Radio} 20:42, 10 July 2009 (BST)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - Pointless. A waste of code. Or any of the other similar statements used to shoot down flavor suggestions on DevSug just because they don't appeal to survivor vanity. A little consistency, people? What happened to "the status quo rules"? Whatever.--Necrofeelinya 23:42, 29 June 2009 (BST)
2. Kill - Necrofeelinya changed my mind. Lobby for a new Hat Shop instead.--
   
   | T | BALLS! | 00:11 30 June 2009
3. Meh. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 02:06, 2 July 2009 (BST)
4. Hat Shop - I like Zombie Lord's idea. -- T^HEL^ORDG^UNS^LINGER 20:16, 10 July 2009 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes