|
|
| (327 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/D/S]]}} | | {{Shortcut|[[A/D/S]]}} |
| {{Moderationnav}} | | {{Administrationnav}} |
| {{TOCright}} | | {{TOCright}} |
|
| |
|
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) | | Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) |
|
| |
|
| After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the request fails to get the required number of votes, it doesn't get added. In either case, the closed request can then get shifted to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|Archive]]. | | After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the vote fails, it will be cycled as unsuccessful. The closed request can then get shifted to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|Archive]]. |
|
| |
|
| ==Scheduling requests under consideration== | | ==Scheduling requests under consideration== |
| ===Defunct Group Images===
| | <!--''There are currently no requests under consideration.''--> |
| For the purposes of this proposed deletion, a "defunct group" is one whose page has been deleted from the wiki through either of the deletion pages. If a defunct group has any images related to their group (provided that they are otherwise unused) they may be deleted along with the group page. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:00, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| | ''There are currently no requests under consideration.'' |
| | | ==Recent Requests== |
| #'''Yes''' - Doesn't happen very often but saves it waiting for the month long unused requirement. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 00:00, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| | <!--''There are currently no recently served requests.'' --> |
| #'''Yes''' - Deleting a group's page and subpages should also bring with it the deletion of images used only on those pages. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:09, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| | ''There are currently no recently served requests.'' |
| #'''No''' - How 'bout you expand it any page, not just group? Assuming the image is not used. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 00:12, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - As Gnome. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:36, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - This only applies to pages less than a month old, which means that the owner would have to request through [[A/SD]] or [[A/D]], and can be easily asked if they want the images gone as well. Group pages less than a month old that are deleted without the owners permission are extremely rare <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:22 3 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #'''No''' - As per above. [[User:Fou-Lu|Fou-Lu]] 02:46, 4 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''N0''' i have no idea what i'm doing----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 15:01, 4 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - As Boxy. It's redundant. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 06:56, 5 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:30, 5 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - Eh, they'll eventually work their way into unused images. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 06:47, 6 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 17:30, 7 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 19:27, 7 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''Yes''' - What Gnome said.--[[User:Teln|Teln]] 03:13, 9 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - As boxy. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 08:47, 9 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ===Unused images===
| |
| Currently unused images are deleted after they have gone one month without an edit. This is way too long; any image that has gone unedited for more than like a week (if that) is pretty much guaranteed to make it all the way down the line. I propose shortening the length of time unused images can go without edits before they are deleted to one week. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:00, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| :The deletion of unused images is already problematic. Images can not be restored if a mistake is made, and it is very easy to delete images that have been removed in a page wiping vandal act that may not be noticed for some days, or in edit disputes. As soon as they are edited off a page, the image shows up as unused and (unless they've been uploaded recently) immediately qualify for scheduled deletion, with no way for the sysop to track down which page they used to be included on <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:35 1 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| ::Have you looked at the list? It is made up of stupid ingame screenshots, outdated Necronet scans and logos for groups that have become defunct. In my weeks of trimming the list that is quite literally all I have ever seen, and if I was to ever see one that broke this mold I would hold off on nuking it simply because of this fact. The danger you speak of Does Not Exist. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 16:15, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::And in the event that it occurs (which in an extremely rare occasion that it will), it isn't beyond a sysop to notice it was uploaded either more than a month ago, or longer than the ''last'' unused-deletions purge, so an image under any criteria you hypothetically mentioned would stick out like a sore thumb and be fixable. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 16:31, 2 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::How are you going to track down which page an image was removed from, DDR?<br />Even though it is damn easy to tell which page images like [[:Image:Hockey Stick.png|a hockey stick]] are likely to be used on, I still remember people trying to keep a [[:Image:HockeyStick.jpg|"real" hockey stick]] on the [[Melee Weapons|melee weapons]] page, only to have it replaced with ice hockey sticks, and the images deleted as unused.<br />Unless it is obvious which page the image came from, there is no way to know where the images in [[Special:Unusedimages|unused images]] were used on a wiki of this size. Perhaps there is a way to totally rewrite the unused images criteria, so that unused images between a week and a month are free to be deleted on sight, but older ones that turn up are put on an image archive page for a month or two, and only then are they deleted if they remain unused, to give people time to notice that they've been taken off a page <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:39 3 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| :::::Great, so we should bend over backwards with even ''more'' stupid red tape just so idiots don't have their retarded images deleted because of their own laziness and inattention? No thanks. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:51, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::Bob, they LOVE red tape. They kept telling Nubis "the red tape is there for a reason" but the reason is to make people feel important. Good luck fighting the common sense good fight! --[[Image:Globetrotters_Icon.png|15px]] '''[[User:DCC/Suggestions|#99]]''' <sup>''[[User:DCC|DCC]] ''</sup> 02:54, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::Sorry, that should be "I" there instead of "we" - everyone else is happy to sit back and let me do all the work but when I look for something that would make my life so much easier it's all NO U CANT DO THAT HERE ALLOW ME TO SUGGEST AN EVEN WORSE SYSTEM {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 03:55, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::How does this make your life easier? It just means you can delete images earlier <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:58 3 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| :::::::::My prime motivation has been to keep the list as short as possible. Deleting them earlier means that I won't get so pissed off when I see stupid cunts uploading stupid cuntish shit because I know it'll be gone sooner. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:03, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::No, that's why I haven't been worried too much by the problems I've outlined above before, because it's been obvious to me for a while. There are huge numbers of useless images that need to be deleted with a minimum of fuss, even if it occasionally causes problems, and we have the criteria to do that now <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 03:58 3 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| :::::::If you don't give a shit then don't bother typing words {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 04:03, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::In the worst case scenario (when the image doesn't elude to whom it belongs to), go through the user. Even with the history purge interfering it's rarely difficult. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 04:37, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''Yes''' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:00, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #<s>'''Yes''' --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:21, 1 October 2009 (BST)</s>
| |
| #: '''No''' - As Boxy. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 12:39, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #<s>''?''' Are they causing a problem of some sort? If so then I see no reason not to. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 12:11, 1 October 2009 (BST)</s>
| |
| #: '''No''' Sorry Bob, Boxy convinced me too. Without a very good reason I am unlikely to change my mind again. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 13:09, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - There are problems with this scheduled deletion criteria already, it doesn't need strengthening <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:35 1 October 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| #'''No''' --{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 17:21, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''yes''' Because actually whats left in unused images isn't of huge use. Besides with a shorter time span, if I had it saved on my computer on monday to upload, I probably have it still saved the following monday. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:58, 1 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' While I feel one month is too long for the amount of images that get uploaded and forgotten, one week is much too short- users could conceivably upload a few images for a page or project, get sidetracked in real life for a week, and return to find their images had been deleted. I would support shortening it down to two or three weeks, but one week is just too short.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 01:34, 2 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - But only because, as I said on IRC, 2 weeks is more apt in my opinion. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 02:13, 2 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - As redhawk and boxy.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 14:55, 2 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - because the original schedule is fucked up in the first place. Back in the day of Crit12 groups used to be deleted, and when their owners requested the page to be undeleted it couldnt be fully because the images were deleted, without the required period to deem them unused has passed. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 21:25, 2 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #:Good thing Crit 12 doesn't exist anymore, eh? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:34, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - Perhaps two weeks or 15-20 days would be suitable but one week is much too short. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:09, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''Nope''' - --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 00:15, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' - I think 2 weeks is a more suitable alternative. --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 01:37, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''no''' whats the damn rush? some people don't live on this wiki. and need more time to edit or complete projects. shit. goddamn.----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 15:03, 4 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''Weak No''' - As Boxy. Not like the server's going to explode if we don't delete images quickly. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 06:55, 5 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 07:30, 5 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 17:29, 7 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| #'''No''' --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 19:27, 7 October 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Recent Requests==
| | ''For older cases, please see the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|archive]].'' |
| ===[[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive#0x0_Images|0x0 Images]]===
| |
|
| |
|
| '''Failed''' with 5 for, 9 against. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DarkSlateGray|Silver}}-- 17:04, 27 September 2009 (BST)
| | == [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule|Scheduled Deletions]] == |
|
| |
|
| {{UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule}} | | {{UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule}} |
