UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{Promotions Intro}}
{{:A/PM/Intro}}
==Candidates still requiring vouches==


==Candidates currently under community discussion==
==Candidates Being Discussed==  
<!--''There are no candidates currently under community discussion''-->
<!---


===[[User:Misanthropy|Misanthropy]]===
''There are no candidates at this time.''
{{vndl|Misanthropy}}


I've been thinking about this for a few weeks, was going to put it off but I can't really see a reason to. I've been active here for about 8-9 months, I guess, and apart from personal upkeep of group and user stuff, I'm mostly concerned with weighing in on suggestions, scheduled deletions, and all that community niceness. I'd like to be able to take a more pro-active role in tackling vandals, doing the deletions that're scheduled, and probably tackling the merged locations, and sysop access would save a bunch of time in the latter. I'm currently a sysop over at the Teletraan I Transformers wiki, so I'm not new to the interface, and I'll not be fucking about with buttons I'm not really meant to. Also you ''know'' you need someone to be the dashing face of this operation. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 06:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
!--->
''There are no candidates at this time.''


*'''Vouch''' - Hey, why not. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
==Recent Bids==
*:Usually you put a question mark after a rhetorical question. Or just fail at english, that's cool too! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:47, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*::ENGLISH IS A PROPER NOUN YOU IDIOT *sits back and basks in the glow of his irrelevant cheap shot* {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::Starting a sentence with "Or"? When did that become acceptable? English should also have a capital letter. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::brb, sysop bias to attend to. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*::::every chance i get babe {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 11:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*::::Learnin' from the [[UDWiki:Administration/Misconduct/Archive/J3D/2009|best]]. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 13:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Mis knows his stuff. He'd be a good Sysop here. {{User:Goribus/Sig}} 07:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak Against''' - Great guy, average contribution rate, most of which are either just group/user stuff. Love your presence in the community though. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 08:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Vouch'''</s> '''Strong Vouch''' - In all honesty I thought with the whole transformers thing he might have been a cock, but he appears level headed and generally interested in maintaining the wiki. However '''Questions''' What do you think the wiki needs to do to become a more useful tool? '''AND''' if I was writing down the noise a transformer makes when it transforms, how would I spell it? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
::Aw, shucks. If you're referring to the whole wiki/wikia split, it's a petty heap of shit that I avoided from day one, since it was the kind of drama that no amount of giving-a-care would help. As for your questions, first answer is to attempt to get a more active base for detailing recent events, as the wiki currently seems like the obituary for a fun game from a few years back, rather than one that's still very active. A more active userbase on the wiki would also increase turnover for things like suggestions and policy discussions, and could be drummed up with threads on the major forums (Brainstack, PKA, Hub, Barhah, etc). The answer to your second question is (IPA) ''[ʒʌ ʒoʊ ʒʌ ʒoʊ ʒiː]'' {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 09:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - you seem fine but for some reason you give me the impression that you're an alt of someone else...probably just wiki competence and you sorta came from nowhere in my view. But with the whole nubis thing just behind us it's like, eh. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:your a moran {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 10:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Against''' - You seem nice enough but I can't really recall seeing enough of your contributions.  Also I'm starting to feel overwhelmed by the wave of sysop candidates and I'm saving my last vouch for Aichon.=)</s>--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 10:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:I'll reply on your talk page in more detail, but, to summarize, please don't save that last Vouch for me. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
:'''Vouch''' - The many vouches have caused me to reconsider, and on closer examination I see that Misanthropy is a fast learner and does a lot of good.  Baa-aa-aa-aa-aa :P--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 02:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - ''More fresh blooood!''--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 10:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I have nothing against you, but I disagree with your possible promotion. Get drama or something. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 12:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Id penis Mis 'til it broke. And I guess he'd make a good Sysop too. {{User:Urgggggggh/sig}} 12:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' sure why the hell not. i've been saving a "yes" vote for the right person.----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 14:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - '''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 14:48, 19 November 2009 (BST)
*'''Vouch''' - Guess I will pick Vouch, since their is no '''FUCK YEAH''' option. Decent guy in and out of game, knows his shit inside and out, and is always there to aid when needed. --[[User:Matt Aries|Matt Aries]] 14:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' – If you've got the will to do this largely thankless job, more power to you. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 15:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Seems to know what he's doing. --{{User:Dark Blue Helmet/Sig}} 15:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''<s>Vouch</s>Abstain''' - <s>Why aren't you better known?  Maybe because you are most active in the boring sections of the wiki (suburbs/groups/events etc) and not the drama-heavy sections (suggestions/admin.)  Isn't that a good thing? --[[User:Explodey|Explodey]] 16:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)</s> Withdrawn.  [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Developing_Suggestions&diff=1606758&oldid=1606757 This] may have proved me wrong.  Sysops need to be more careful than the rest of us about throwing words like "vandal" around inappropriately. --[[User:Explodey|Explodey]] 22:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*:The irony here is beyond all proportions. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 16:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''<s>Weak Against</s>Abstain''' -- I don't like self nomination, but you seem to know what you're doing. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 16:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak Against''' - I don't actually see why you need sysop buttons; since you mainly do user/group work, it seems like you'd be getting op abilities just for the purpose of having them. I'll change my vote to an abstain or something stronger if you tell me what you plan to do for the wiki.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 16:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Better than other option... - {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 17:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''SAFETINGS''' - Or, in other words '''vouch'''. Because [[A/M]] a whole Sysop team. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}17:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*<!--Actually, it's a Vouch. Don't have a reason not to be against. :/-->'''MASSIVE FUCKING AGAINST''' Because me and DDR are the Dashing Faces of ''this'' operation. '''Punk.''' You should also link your email to the wiki in case another op needs to email you. :( --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 18:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:did you mess up your vouch there? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Slightly, then you edit conflicted me.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 18:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::<!--HAHA! >:D :/--> --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' – Can I get a big FUCK YEAH? This dude knows his stuff. {{user:Claude Garrison/Sig}}20:25, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - You make good edits and you seem to be a good-faith user. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 22:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Too many people want promotion, how bout we discuss limits and have people apply for available vacancys --[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 22:07, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:"Other applicants do not matter when it comes to running." A quote from local guru of all things that make sense, [[User:Suicidalangel|SA]] <nowiki></sage voice></nowiki>. {{User:rorybob/Sig}}22:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:Not to mention "We can never have too many sysops" A quote from an even mightier guru. Your values are flawed in this system. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 22:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Even if too many people want promotion, I can't see him being a negative inffluence. --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - This was almost an abstain. I've definitely seen you around, and in places like suggestions, I've found myself saying "As Misanthropy" more than any other person, since it seems that our opinions align on a lot of things. That said, I haven't really been witness to your presence in some of the areas you're interested in, since I've only just started watching the drama parts of the wiki, so I don't know how you'll handle them (my fault, not yours). That said, I do trust your opinions to be well-considered and to look at the situation from all angles, so you have my support. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:Put simply, we can clean up after him long enough for him to learn the ropes.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Essentially, but that loses all of the nuance and struggle that went into forming my opinion. Plus, I suck at being concise. If ''brevity is the soul of wit'', then I've got to be the most idiotic person you'll ever meet. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::I've noticed your inability to simplify things for my lesser brethren. 'Tis okay my fine friend, I'm sure you'll find a more satisfactory and less easily destroyed opinion to use!--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 23:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - I want his babies. --{{User:Gus_Thomas/Sig}} 23:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' --[[User:Hibernaculum|Hibernaculum]] 00:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' WOOT --<b>[[User:Imthatguy|<span style="color:white">Imthatguy</span>]] is on the wiki looking at ur pagez </b> 03:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Seems good enough. -- [[User :Armpit Odor|<span style="color:red"><sup>A</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>O</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>R</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>D</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>M</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>O</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>P</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>R</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>I</sup><span style="color:green"><sub> ! </sub><span style="color:red"><sup>T</sup></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>]]  - 21:17 20 November 2009 (BST)
*'''Vouch''' - Though... are you still going to have time for that forum thing (you know the one I'm talking about ;) ).  Seriously, though, Mis would be a valuable addition to the sysop team here on the Wiki. --{{User:Lois_Millard/sig}} 23:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Oh come the fuck on, wait your turn. I don't even know who the fuck you are.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 09:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Abstain'''</s> '''Against''' - You seem to be great, but I don't really know you, or how you'd deal with things. Also, too many of your edits seem to be about your own group or userspace.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 10:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*:Alright, I've just run through your last 500 edits to check I'm right, and I drummed out that 265 of your last 500 edits were on your own group or user page. Or their talks, templates, etc. Now, you might get a weak vouch out of me from that, but the fact that 105 of those edits were made shortly after DDR's comment that you needed less user comments makes me kind of less inclined to.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 11:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Moved to [[UDWiki talk:Administration/Promotions|talk page.]] --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 19:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


*'''Against''' - Quite beside the fact that I have almost no idea who you are (moar drama plox), there also appears to be quite a high number of people who hardly use the wiki voting "Vouch". No thanks.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 16:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
===[[User:Hagnat]]===
*'''Vouch''' - Has proven himself to be a biased, narrow-minded, unimaginative fool. Perfect SysOp material. Prepared to take out my trash, beotch.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>18:37 22 November 2009(BST)</tt>
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Hagnat/2019-08-14 Promotion|Archived as Unsuccessful]].
*:This vouch made me laugh.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 18:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Dun feed teh troll! --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::Another perfect example. I nominate Thadeous [[User:MisterGame|"MisterGay"]] Oakley for SysOp.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>18:57 22 November 2009(BST)</tt>
*::::No thx, not interested. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 19:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::::Whoa forget putting thad up, ZL would make the most unforgettably fitting sysop and no one's even considered him yet! D= --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|DimGray|Crimson}}-- 23:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*::::::I'd second that nomination :) --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 12:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::::::Thirded, isn't that enough to consider an official bid? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I don't think he has the mental capacity to run the wiki. In fact I'm surprised that he manages to use the internet at all without the help of an aid or parent. He's unintelligent to the nth degree. --[[User:Saromu|Sonny Corleone]] <sup>[[DORIS]] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4 I jizzed in my pants]  [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91a8pHj7V9k pr0n]</sup> 19:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
::Teehee. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
:::'Crats, promote this man. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 07:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - For level-headness, from my most narrow POV. --[[User:Natakaasd|Natakaasd]] 11:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - You seem nice and from what I've seen, you know what you're doing. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - ''I'' see no reason why not. That is all that is needed. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


===[[User:Yonnua Koponen|Yonnua Koponen]]===
===[[User:DanceDanceRevolution]]===
{{vndl|Yonnua Koponen}}
*[[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/DanceDanceRevolution/2018-07-30 Promotion|Archived as Successful]].


Alright, so it's been a month since I was nominated by Thad, but as I said at the time, I thought it would be best to wait a month before running. So, the basic skin of the matter. I'm experienced in all manners of wiki activities. I know the admin pages well. I've also performed several large scale janitorial tasks. I helped Ross kick the Orphans, and I've been helping to keep the list down since then. I archive the suburb news once a month, an activity which I just performed on Thursday. Generally, I'm an active member of the community, and I'm hoping to take it to the next level, and help contributing as part of the sysop team. Well then, err, thanks for any vouches, and if you have any queries or issues, feel free to express them.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 12:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
==Archived Bids==
 
''For earlier promotion bids, see the following:''
*<s>'''Abstain''' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)</s>
*[[:Category:{{CURRENTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|This year's promotion bids]]
*:'''Against''' - Nah, too obnoxious. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 17:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*[[:Category:{{LASTYEAR}}_Promotion_Archives|Last year's promotion bids]]
*'''Against''' - You've been getting better at everything but you aren't someone I trust when handling drama- and it's not something I have faith you'll stay away from. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 13:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*[[A/SA|Sysop Archives]] for older bids and related sysop activities
*'''Vouch''' - Everything you do is positively contributing to the wiki.  You're not afraid to have an opinion, but you're not a dick, either.  I'm sure you can handle the drama and be a good janitor.  'Nuff said.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak Vouch''' -Both as DDR and Giles. And hell, you kicked <s>the</s> some of the Orphans! --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*:I got rid of a few. Maybe 100 odd. Ross did about 15 times as many as me. Mine was a very small part.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 13:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Fixed. ^ --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 20:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
* '''Vouch''' - You're a keeper. {{User:Rorybob/Sig}}14:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
* Slightly weaker '''vouch''' than last time. Although the admin stuff is all there, some of your dealings with the more prickly wiki users have been less than perfect. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
* '''Ross'''.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 15:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
* '''Vouch''' - I trust him to what is right. ---{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 15:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak Against''' - He is an active member of the UDwiki community, but as sysop, he would potentially have to deal with conflicts among other members. I have experience on a firsthand basis how thin skinned and immature he can be at times. --[[User:FLZombie|FLZombie]] 16:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*:That would be when you accused me of vandalism, and I then showed you inconclusive proof that it wasn't me?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Not all questions or complaints have to be taken personally, Yonnua. It was not a vandalism accusation - if I actually did think it was, I would have reported it as such. It was a simple request to not alter the map - which may have occurred accidentally. I included images to show proof that the map was accurate as I had fixed it - not knowing that I had attributed the changes to you erroneously. Yes, I apologized to you - twice in fact - in view of how upset you were evidenced by your childish name calling. I am an otherwise helpful editor, at a level of expertise that could only be described as beginner or novice. I am not a troublemaker, and was attempting only to help. The wiki is a place where editors of all levels of experience contribute, and perhaps I should avoid dealing with you in the foreseeable future. I think you are a great editor, and I wish you the best, but as Sysop, it is expected that you will have to deal with more that a fair share of "stupid pricks... posting slanderous(sic) accusations" and you can't get into a fight every single time. I will end my involvement in this discussion with an apology for having caused you so much trouble. --[[User:FLZombie|FLZombie]] 01:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::Just a small note; Don't call someone thin skinned and immature, when you don't want him to take it personally. That was a personal accusation alright. That was it. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
* <s>'''Weak Keep'''</s> '''Vouch''' -  He's a nice guy who does tons of wiki-helpful things, but that's not what makes a sysop. I'm unsure of his drama-immunity; though I've seen him avoid plenty, I've also seen him get caught up in a few shitstorms. I'd probably be more enthusiastic if I knew why you wanted sysop powers, Yon.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 17:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*: To help out with the general admin tasks and flow of the wiki. Give me something to do on weekends. Also to provide support when other admins are absent. Oh, I also want to enforce a harsh ansd ruthless dictatorship to crush any wiki-resistance. ;) --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:14, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
::So you basically want op buttons for teh lulz and to rule on dramatic cases?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
:::No.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 11:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
::::So help me out here, what do you intend to do with them?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 15:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::To help out with the general admin tasks and flow of the wiki. Give me something to do on weekends. Also to provide support when other admins are absent.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 16:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
::::::Well, I guess housekeeping work does still need to be done around here, and since we have A/RE, it's not like giving people a shot has a big damage potential any more. I guess I'll say '''Vouch''' - Why not?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 16:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::::OMGZ TWO VOUCHES ALERT LOLCATS --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 21:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
* '''against''' Active player, but says NO to every suggestion --[[User:Winman1|Winman1]] 17:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*: Umm, no I don't...?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 20:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*::He's just butthurt because his ideas suck.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:45, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Just to counter winman1's incredibly lame rationale. (oh and he does good work too) --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 18:20, 15 November 2009 (BST)
*'''Against''' - you sound like you're black... insta-against--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 19:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*:I love you(r) Rak.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 21:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*:This could be the greatest piece of sysop bias i have ever seen. Congrats you incompetant retards, you have confirmed my long held suspicion that you're all out to get me! {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*:Oh and this browser is spell check free so don't bother paying me out for incorrect spelling if there was any. Also guy below needs to get a templated sig. {{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - Seems like he'd be good. [[User :Armpit Odor|<span style="color:red"><sup>A</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>O</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>R</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>D</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>M</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>O</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>P</sup><span style="color:green"><sub>R</sub><span style="color:red"><sup>I</sup><span style="color:green"><sub> ! </sub><span style="color:red"><sup>T</sup></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>]]  - 20:49 15 November 2009 (BST)
*'''Against''' - I actually would've been more up for supporting you last month. In recent history though, you've had a few lapses in judgement, such as the suggested policy that didn't go through, the dealings with Iscariot's vandal data, and one or two other matters that I don't recall off the top of my head. None of them are permanent black marks, but, as DDR mentioned, I'm afraid I wouldn't trust you with drama, which you've demonstrated an interest in getting involved in. I think you're a nice guy and do good work around the wiki (even thanked you for it earlier this week), but the drama issue is something I can't get around right now. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - I don't think you are ready for the responsibilities involved in being a sysop. Don't take it personally. I think you're pretty cool, though :P --[[User:Chekken|Chekken]] 01:02, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' i'll change it to vouch if you promise to kick bob in the nuts once a month.----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 01:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - because i hated Winman's suggestions too --{{User:The Colonel/Sig}} 02:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''weak against''' - You're a solid user, but I'm not quite convinced that you're sysop material. Not yet -- and one extra month isn't time enough... However, I don't think it matters what the community thinks anymore... c.f. red hawk one... le sigh --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 02:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*:+1 Mr. Yao. +1 --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 02:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' -If I get in a mood where I feel like causing a ruckus, I would do it when you are on watch, because I don't think you are good enough to handle my shit. Hence, you vicariously shit yourself. You would understand if you gave yourself more than a months waiting time, instead of going away, making no improvements or endearing yourself to the community at large, besides getting in shitfights (and losing them) against some of the userbase and ultimately proving that if shit goes down, you can't handle it--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Against''' - Holy crap, been scrappin the bottom of the bloody barrel for awhile now on these promotion bids, but this is scrappin the shit off the floor underneath the barrel.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>07:43 16 November 2009(BST)</tt></s>
*:come back when you have had some real experience at creating mild shock.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 07:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Not interested in shock, mild or otherwise. It's just the sad truth.{{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>07:47 16 November 2009(BST)</tt>
*:::Fuck it, I changed my mind. Yonnua has shown he can be reasonable and has a sense of humor. '''Vouch''' {{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>22:51 22 November 2009(BST)</tt>
*'''Against''' A frequent contributer who does a lot of useful work but I am not sure Yonnua could even contemplate being a neutral judge when dealing with anyone he disagree's with and that is an absolute must for sysophood. --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 12:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*:recent behaviour kinda proves my point. I would change to "Strongly Against" but I can't be bothered learning how to stike the previous and Yonnua does do a lot of good work and deserves some credit for that.... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 23:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*<s>'''Against''' Only a month between bids? [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 15:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)</s>
*:Because I didn't accept the last one, and wanted to run now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*::Fair enough...  '''Weak Vouch''', but weak only just because I don't know him very well. [[User:Asheets|Asheets]] 21:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - i trust him not to fuck with the tools that will be given to him, nor to abuse his ruling powers in his favor... has he little experience with admin stuff, sure. But there are several other sysops that can help him see the way(tm) --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 16:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' Not a good fit at the present. --{{User:Marcusfilby/sig}} 18:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - As Giles, also disagree on the drama thing, he's better than most at avoiding it. --[[User:Explodey|Explodey]] 20:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Weak Vouch''' - Good user, and I trust him enough for buttons. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 04:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Oddly enough, I find myself agreeing with Sexylegsread. -- {{User:BlackReaper/sig}} 04:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - conflict can get nasty! --[[User:C Whitty|C Whitty]] 23:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Vouch''' - For what it's worth. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''Against''' - Though there's little point in me adding this, there are four vouches and that's all the 'crat team needs for promotion nowadays apparently. Promoting this user would be like promoting Conndraka again as he shares many of the same tendencies, there are numerous examples of him creating and causing further drama for his own gain or amusement, coupled with his lack of objectivity will make him a sysop the community will be burdened with for eight months until we can get rid. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*:I actually have a 50% vouch rate. And if I get put in, I'll have a re-evaluation in 4. Not that you'll change your vote anyway.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 20:23, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*::You have a 50% vouch rate so I should change my bolded keyword? I think not. You'll have a re-evaluation in four months? Really? Odd how this didn't go in your bid, considering you wrote it and all. No I won't be changing my ''vote'' (careful use of that superpower called reading reveals this isn't a vote, a potential sysop might realise that...), you are unsuitable to be a sysop for a single day let alone any amount of months. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::Fair enough. It's your opinion. The vote thing was a linguistic screw-up. And really, me re-evaluating in 4 months shouldn't be part of the equation, as you said, because if someone is an inherently bad sysop, then even a couple of months could be damaging. So it's more of a then thing than a now thing. I just wanted a record of it so that if I do make sysop, I'll remember to stick by it.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 20:40, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*::::Certainly isn't my opinion, it's fact. This is not a vote, people should not alter their input due to numbers of people going the other way and you are most definitely unfit based on your conduct. Thing is, the only other sysop with a re-evaluation clause, made it part of his bid so it's was actually enforceable. You haven't. It's not enforceable, it's words on a page, another act done for how it looks rather than for the right reasons. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 20:46, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
*:::::Don't forget how I got people angry at me for it too!--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 00:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 
==Recently Concluded Bids==
''For more concluded bids, see [[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Promotion Candidacies]].''
 
===[[User:Red Hawk One|Red Hawk One]]===
 
'''Promoted''' and [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Red Hawk One|archived]]. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Rorybob|Rorybob]]===
 
'''Rejected''' and [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Rorybob|archived]]. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 23:25, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 
===[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]]===
 
'''Promoted''' and [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Rosslessness (3)|archived]]. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 13:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 
==Archived Promotions==
 
*[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
*[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
*[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
*[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]

Latest revision as of 08:31, 14 August 2019

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for users to request System Operator status. The act of user promotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such users will need to request user promotion here. System Operators and Bureaucrats cannot assign promotions unless the request has gone through this page.

Guidelines for System Operator Requests

Users who wish to request System Operator status (and users who wish to nominate other users for System Operator status) should note that before they can be considered the following guidelines should be met by the candidate:

  • Significant time within the community.
We define this as at least 6 months since the candidate's first edit.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Significant activity within the community.
We define this as at least 250 edits in the past six months under the candidate's name.
Note: looking in a User's User contributions might give false results for this criterion, as the edit history is periodically purged on this wiki.
  • Prior interest in maintaining the community.
We define this as clear evidence that the candidate is already performing maintenance tasks and taking leadership roles on the wiki.
  • Desire to become a System Operator.
We define this simply as indicating in the candidate's request their desire for the position (Note that if a person is nominated by another user, the candidate in question should note their acceptance of the nomination).

If a user is highly exemplary in one criterion, a certain amount of leeway may be given with the other criteria.

Once the candidate satisfies these guidelines, the user is then subject to a community discussion. All users are asked to comment on the candidate in question, ask questions of the candidate, and discuss the candidate's suitability for becoming a System Operator. This is not a vote. It is instead merely a request for comments from the wiki community. This will continue for two weeks to allow all users an opportunity to voice their opinion regarding a candidate's qualifications for promotion. After two weeks, the Bureaucrats are responsible for announcing their decision within a reasonably short period of time. Users may continue to add their thoughts until the Bureaucrats announce their decision. The current amount of System Operators running should not influence your decisions when voicing your opinion.

Once the two weeks are up, the Bureaucrats will review the community discussion and make a decision based upon it. The user will be notified of the status of their request, and will be promoted should it appear that the community is willing to accept them as a System Operator.

Example Application

Example User

I've been around 3 months, and I've made to date 550 edits. As you can see [link here] and [link here], I've been in the leadership role attempting to create a new format for this page. I'd very much like to become a System Operator.

  • Vouch - I am willing to vouch for this user. -- Voucher 03:41, 23 Jan 2006 (GMT)
  • Against - Example User, I haven't seen any evidence of your work on the wiki. --Some user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Vouch - Example User is the most active guy here. --Another user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Abstain - I'm just not sure, but I don't want to say why for some reason. --Some other user 19:01, 25 July 2006 (BST)
  • Question - I just want to know what you think about this subject? --Yet another user 21:26, 4 April 2013 (BST)


Candidates Being Discussed

There are no candidates at this time.

Recent Bids

User:Hagnat

User:DanceDanceRevolution

Archived Bids

For earlier promotion bids, see the following: