UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{| align="right"
{| align="right"
|__TOC__
|__TOC__
Line 7: Line 7:


=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
<!--
<!--


If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
 
-->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
<!--
<!--
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
 
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
==Active cases==
===[[User:Iscariot]] versus [[User:Ravenium]]===
Ravenium has:
#engaged in a smear campaign against the Militant Order of Barhah
#refused to provide any proof of his allegations
#edited to remove all credit of MOB (even when allowed by NPOV guidelines) from danger reports
#refused to listen to basic logic and proof that has been provided by other users
#engaged in edit wars in bad faith to try and force his pro-survivor view on contested pages
 
I contest his edits to the Pole Mall danger report and seek to have these matter resolved by an arbitrator.
 
I will accept [[User:Revenant]], [[User:Grogh]], [[User:Amber Waves of Pain]] or [[User:Rosslessness]] as arbitrator. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 02:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
:Having seen this edit war in progress, I'll vouch for Izzy's side of things. Ravenium has been heavy-handedly biased in labelled others as 'griefers' and reverting NPOV reports. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
I realize Iscariot has named those he would like, however, if they decline I will volunteer myself to arbitrate. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
:Sure I'll arby. Thats my only comment on the case I'll make, to avoid bias.--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


=Recently Concluded cases=
=Recently Concluded cases=
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cheveyo_vs_Rosslessness|Cheveyo vs Rosslessness]]===
<!--
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Cheveyo|Cheveyo]] vs. [[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]]|arbitrator=[[User:Maverick Farrant|Maverick Farrant]]|created_at=09:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC) |created_by=[[User:Cheveyo|Cheveyo]]|status=Completed|summary=Dispute over Zerging Allegations}}
If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header
 
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Taco2 vs Iscariot|Taco2 vs Iscariot]]===
-->
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Taco2|Taco2]] vs. [[User:Iscariot|Iscariot]]|arbitrator=None|created_at=19:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |created_by=Taco2|status=Archived.|summary=Taco2 was unsatisfied and offended by Iscariot's behaviour around her.}}
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
 
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Zombie Lord vs Bob Boberton|Zombie Lord vs Bob Boberton]]===
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Zombie Lord|Zombie Lord]] vs. [[User:BobBoberton|Bob Boberton]]|arbitrator=[[User:Yonnua Koponen|Yonnua Koponen]]|created_at=23:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)|created_by=[[User:Yonnua Koponen|Yonnua Koponen]]|status=Completed.|summary=Zombie Lord wants Bob to stop commenting on his DS suggestions.}}
 
 
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Lelouch_vs_Zombie_Lord|Lelouch vs Zombie Lord]]===
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Lelouch|Lelouch]] vs. [[User:Zombie Lord|Zombie Lord]]|arbitrator=[[User:Suicidalangel|SA]]|created_at=00:34, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |created_by=[[User:Lelouch|Lelouch]]|status=Completed|summary=Dispute over Developing Suggestions}}


=Archives=
=Archives=
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives