User talk:DanceDanceRevolution

I win

Thanks to HTML--Orange Talk 00:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I could win by altering the floating box code to go over it, but can't be bothered so :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

It's obviously not considered standard if people keep going "against" because of how many are running. And you know damn good and well that saying it's not a vote in bold was needed. >:( -- SA 00:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Noes

I winz :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

edit User talk:DanceDanceRevolution Start a topic. Press: + Is it an emergency?  Email  Archives 2007 2008 2009 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2010 H1 H2 2011 Q1 Q2 H2 MORE 2012 2013 2014-2017

Top of the new talk page

I win.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

--DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

First!

ಠ_ಠ --Orange Talk 23:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

--DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Angel is teh bestest sysops evar and I wuv him and never want him to leave the wiki agains!--Orange Talk 00:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

A/A

I noticed this particular line on the A/AG page (under "How to Arbitrate"):

4. Between them, the involved users choose an arbitrator

• The people in the case can choose any user of the wiki, be them listed in the Current Arbitrators list or not.
• You can see how an arbitrator has conducted their previous cases at Category:Arbitration Cases.
• If no arbitrator is agreed upon, one will be chosen by the administration team.

There is still no timeline of any kind (or precedent that I know of) as far as when the administration team chooses an arbitrator. But there does appear to be something on the wiki addressing it, if a little vague. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 09:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

History is tangled. Look at the archive for the number of cases abandoned, sorted by users involved, sent to vandalism, etc. As for precedent, (someone) was trying to set up an archive of particularly ground breaking VB and Misconduct cases, but I can't remember who.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 09:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Nubis on Izzy? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 13:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Yonnua put this together.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 14:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah, that's rubbish. it certainly isn't what they're talking about.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 16:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmm.. The thing is I would refrain from choosing any sort of arbitrator. Not only because I am indirectly an involved party, but also because I think the case is ridiculous. Might have to get another op to intervene, because the only outcopme I would push for is the closure of the case, or an arbitrator who encompasses that. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 15:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

We seriously fucking need to get something sorted to deal with dipshits who think they can cheat the system by doing the sort of thing you're endorsing right there. If the case is so blatantly ridiculous then I'm sure it'll be thrown out - so that "oh what a shit case look at how bad and horrible it is welp guess I'll just fuck with the system instead of taking the risk that I might lose such a "shit" case" crap is really just a bunch of empty posturing. peace Cyberbob  Talk  16:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

What he said^.-- SA 19:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Ugh...you guys really think I should accept one of Iscaridiot's candidates :/ ? I dunno at this point, I don't think it's a good idea to let Iz believe that he can try to just overthrow every arby case he doesn't like. Though, judging by his lack of activity in the case, I don't think he has enough time or interest to really pursue the case, but is to stubborn to withdraw.--Thadeous Oakley 20:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't lying when I said Revenant was the best offer Iscariot gave.-- SA 20:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)