Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
#'''Keep''' - Scouts for the Rescue! --[[User:Gargulec|Gargulec]] 00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Scouts for the Rescue! --[[User:Gargulec|Gargulec]] 00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Give those things an use finally, dammit. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Give those things an use finally, dammit. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 22:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep''' - I like it. Still curious how exactly it'd work but I suppose the stems from my own lack of binocular use, either way some further explaination might be useful. {{User:Mazu/sig}} 04:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
'''Kill Votes'''
'''Kill Votes'''
#'''Kill''' - {{KISS}} and [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Writing_New_Suggestions|Pin the Details Down]]. I want to know '''exactly''' how much AP you're suggesting that this cost, and I don't see why there should be two skills for an ultimately trivial boost. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - {{KISS}} and [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Writing_New_Suggestions|Pin the Details Down]]. I want to know '''exactly''' how much AP you're suggesting that this cost, and I don't see why there should be two skills for an ultimately trivial boost. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 23:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Line 40: Line 40:
#'''Kill''' - two skills just for binoculars? Excessive. Also concerned about the see-through-walls quality of it. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - two skills just for binoculars? Excessive. Also concerned about the see-through-walls quality of it. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
#*'''Re''' - There is so much useless XP gained after maxing out both skill trees...why not make leveling all the way up take longer? --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 20:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
#*'''Re''' - There is so much useless XP gained after maxing out both skill trees...why not make leveling all the way up take longer? --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 20:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''



Revision as of 04:36, 21 January 2011

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20110110 Recon Training

Bjornkarl 22:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Skill

Suggestion scope
Survivors

Suggestion description
This skill would be made available as a Military skill. There are 8 ways to look with binoculars: purchasing this skill would provide an additional option at the cost of 6 or 7 AP to look in every direction with a single action. This way, players could still look in a single direction for 1 AP, or 3 directions for 3 AP, but a complete circular sweep would be more AP economical. An additional tier of this skill could be Advanced Recon Training, which would reduce the cost of the sweep to 4 or 5 AP. The existing rules applying to where binoculars can and cannot be used would remain unaltered.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep - Voting for my own suggestion. Besides, I think this skill is useful. --Bjornkarl 22:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  2. I see no reason why not. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 22:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  3. Keep/Change - I like it but a cost should be specified. I'm voting for max AP cost listed in suggestion. ~Vsig.png 22:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  4. It's no Binocular Sniping, but its still good. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  5. Yessss, but please specify ammount of AP. ~m T! 02:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  6. Keep - I see you! --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 03:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  7. Keep - I echo Trips' sentiments, but I still like it regardless. Aichon 06:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  8. Keep - New skills are cool--Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 16:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  9. Keep - KISS and Seeing through walls don't even apply here.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  10. Keep - I wanna peep my 'hood from the comfort of an abandoned rooftop, so this doesn't seem useless to me. - Nic LesFlics|?| 21:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  11. Keep - Yeah I dig. -- LEMON #1 02:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
  12. Keep - Scouts for the Rescue! --Gargulec 00:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
  13. Keep - Give those things an use finally, dammit. -- Spiderzed 22:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
  14. Keep - I like it. Still curious how exactly it'd work but I suppose the stems from my own lack of binocular use, either way some further explaination might be useful.        04:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - KISS and Pin the Details Down. I want to know exactly how much AP you're suggesting that this cost, and I don't see why there should be two skills for an ultimately trivial boost. --VVV RPMBG 23:45, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Re - If this isn't simple, I don't know what is. --Bjornkarl 20:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
      It's not that it's complicated so much as that it could be simpler. --VVV RPMBG 00:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
  2. Kill - two skills just for binoculars? Excessive. Also concerned about the see-through-walls quality of it. When I fall, I'll weep for happiness 19:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Re - There is so much useless XP gained after maxing out both skill trees...why not make leveling all the way up take longer? --Bjornkarl 20:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes




Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20110110 Recon Training). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)