UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
#'''For''' - As [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats|discussed on the talk page]]. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - As [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats|discussed on the talk page]]. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - Agree - [[User:Louis_Vernon|<span style="color: red">'''Louis Vernon'''</span>]] <span style="color:red">11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)</span>
#'''For''' - Agree - [[User:Louis_Vernon|<span style="color: red">'''Louis Vernon'''</span>]] <span style="color:red">11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)</span>
#'''FORE!'''--&nbsp;[[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|link=User:Sexualharrison| HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS! | 16px]] &nbsp; <small> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">bitch</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</small><small>16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)</small>


===Against===
===Against===

Revision as of 15:04, 18 May 2011

This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.


New Text would be

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  2. Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  3. Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  4. For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  5. For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  6. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
  7. Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations. Clearly. Yes. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
    Mod Conspiracy. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  8. For - As discussed on the talk page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  9. For - Agree - Louis Vernon 11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)
  10. FORE!-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch  16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)

Against

incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)
That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats&oldid=1887224"