UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot vs Sgt Raiden: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==St. Iscariot, Wiki Martyr and Mall Tour 2009 versus User:Sgt_Raiden== Given the incompetence of the sysop team in ruling a vandalism case correctly, St. Iscario...)
 
m (+Category)
Line 27: Line 27:
:::Perhaps we don't want to just advise him to bow down to Iscariots blatant misuse of the Arbitration system.....--{{User:The General/sig}} 20:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:::Perhaps we don't want to just advise him to bow down to Iscariots blatant misuse of the Arbitration system.....--{{User:The General/sig}} 20:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Just archive it, nobody cares about this case. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Just archive it, nobody cares about this case. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
[[Category:Arbitration Cases]]

Revision as of 23:41, 19 January 2009

St. Iscariot, Wiki Martyr and Mall Tour 2009 versus User:Sgt_Raiden

Given the incompetence of the sysop team in ruling a vandalism case correctly, St. Iscariot, Wiki Martyr, and The Mall Tour 2009 seek to prevent the user known as Sgt Raiden from making any further edits on this wiki concerning the Mall Tour 2009. I will accept User:Johnny Bass, User:Dr Cory Bjornson and User:Fifth Element as arbitrators. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 05:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Call me stupid, but aren't Johnny and Fifth Element both working with the Mall Tour, and since the Mall Tour is named in this case... Linkthewindow  Talk  05:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
OK, you're stupid. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 05:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I am not part of this case. Wiki Martyr 06:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Extraneous discussion moved to talk page -- Cheese 02:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

LOL, quite a case to bring against a wiki newbie... seeking to forbid them from commenting on one of the major current events in the game, and giving them a list of arbitrators to pick from, all of whom are Mall Tourists. Noice -- boxy talkteh rulz 10:12 15 January 2009 (BST)

You could have handed out a warning and reverted the contentious edit, and all of this would have been avoided, the warning itself would have been struck before the end of the Mall Tour 2009 given his rate of contributions. However, you didn't, and stated clearly that it was a matter for arbitration. You're always going on about how I don't follow correct procedure, well I did what you told me to do.... -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 16:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
So much for the user who claims its the sysops fault that users are being driven away from the wiki. --People's Commissar Hagnat talk mod 10:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I reject you as a potential arbitrator. According to your own badly crafted guidelines, please refrain from posting on the main page of this case again. Take it to the talk page, I'm sure someone will read what you have to say. -- To know the face of God is to know madness....Praise knowledge! Mischief! Mayhem! The Rogues Gallery!. <== DDR Approved Editor 16:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I offer to arbitrate. --Pestolence(talk) 21:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

How about before this turns into a totally irrelevant and bitter flame war, someone gets Sgt. Raiden to actually respond and accept or reject this case?--SirArgo Talk 21:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

He's been notified on his talk page already. (And I don't believe you can reject a case.) --Pestolence(talk) 21:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't think thats actually ever been tried, however, i think that rejecting (or rather refusing to take part) would be a valid response given that arbitration is by definition a process involving 2 parties agreeing to accept the input of a nuetral 3rd! In any event he can just refuse all arbitration until the case collapses... It's a shit way to do it; and should not really be allowed; but it is a tried and tested way to fuck with the system!--Honestmistake 00:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
And while I understand all of that, what I was getting at is why don't we give him a decent chance to respond before this page turns into an all out war.--SirArgo Talk 01:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

What are the edits which have brought this case forth? All I can see is someone posting POV stuff. While I'm sure that Sgt Raiden needs a lesson on keeping his posts in an netural POV on suburb pages and what not, I don't see any reason in his edits for an arbitration case, let alone you trying to resolve the issue by you talking to him. As of such, unless you give me a really good reason not to archive this case, this case will be removed within the next few days. - Jedaz - 00:37/16/01/2009

Extraneous discussion moved to talk page -- Cheese 02:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, ok! God, after pointless notifies i accept the ****ing case! God, I don't even want to post about Mall Tour 2009. THERE. ARE YOU SATISFIED??! MRH!!!!!!! --Sgt Raiden

Sgt Raiden... You can come to an agreement and the Arby can be dropped... Just because it's started doesn't mean it has to keep going... But I'd assume Iscariot would have to trust you at your word... Try. --WanYao 23:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
What Wan said. Since all Iscariot really wants is you to stop posting about the mall tour, you can just agree to do that and this will hopefully go away. Linkthewindow  Talk  23:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps we don't want to just advise him to bow down to Iscariots blatant misuse of the Arbitration system.....--The General T Sys U! P! F! 20:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Just archive it, nobody cares about this case. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)