User talk:Imthatguy: Difference between revisions
Ralph Nader (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
::::::Thanks (in advance) for clarifying, and answering my questions. If I somehow offend you in any way, please tell me...I was just in a discussion on Poodle of doom's [[User talk:Poodle of doom|talk page]], and he got very angry at me for some reason. He still is. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 21:50, 14 October 2009 (BST) | ::::::Thanks (in advance) for clarifying, and answering my questions. If I somehow offend you in any way, please tell me...I was just in a discussion on Poodle of doom's [[User talk:Poodle of doom|talk page]], and he got very angry at me for some reason. He still is. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 21:50, 14 October 2009 (BST) | ||
::::::: The views on said subjects vary from libertarian to libertarian, but in my personal brand i do support proportional representation (but in ways your probably not thinking of), i think government should build roads but eminent domain should not be a power of the state, education should probably be privatized, with grants going to the poor, I'm 50/50 about heathcare but most libertarians prefer privatization, deregulation, and detaxation(a word of my own invention), and (some of this is libertarian rhetoric some of it my own) the two biggest problems with the gap widening between the haves and have-nots is (1)taxes, the richest 5-15% dont pay them because they use overseas tax shelters but the small business man can't and gets taxed out of his ass, (2) (personal view)the trade deficit the elite keep their factories out of the country that would employ the bottom 10% for cheaper labor elsewhere (naturally i support a tariff)--<b>[[User:Imthatguy|<span style="color:#000000">Imthatguy</span>]] is on the wiki looking at ur pagez </b> 19:39, 15 October 2009 (BST) | :::::::The views on said subjects vary from libertarian to libertarian, but in my personal brand i do support proportional representation (but in ways your probably not thinking of), i think government should build roads but eminent domain should not be a power of the state, education should probably be privatized, with grants going to the poor, I'm 50/50 about heathcare but most libertarians prefer privatization, deregulation, and detaxation(a word of my own invention), and (some of this is libertarian rhetoric some of it my own) the two biggest problems with the gap widening between the haves and have-nots is (1)taxes, the richest 5-15% dont pay them because they use overseas tax shelters but the small business man can't and gets taxed out of his ass, (2) (personal view)the trade deficit the elite keep their factories out of the country that would employ the bottom 10% for cheaper labor elsewhere (naturally i support a tariff)--<b>[[User:Imthatguy|<span style="color:#000000">Imthatguy</span>]] is on the wiki looking at ur pagez </b> 19:39, 15 October 2009 (BST) | ||
::::::::So I guess that makes sense...I completely agree with you about the rich keeping factories outside of the U.S. in places like China, where there is cheap and child labor; thus, I would also support a tariff. I find your first reason, though (the one about overseas tax shelters) quite intriguing; perhaps you can explain in more detail. I do, however, agree that small business owners are being taxed too much, so I didn't agree with Obama on his 250K+ tax - many of the huge corporate executives that I despise are in that range, but I would rather that they be punished for corruption than be taxed like that, where you say that they can escape taxes. | |||
::::::::But then you also say that you support a proportional representation, but not of the kind I'm thinking of - what kind are you thinking of? And whom do you vote for, come presidential elections? | |||
::::::::P.S. Maybe we should stop indenting our posts, we're taking up a lot of space. Please say if you agree in your next post. [[User:Ralph Nader|Ralph Nader]] 22:15, 15 October 2009 (BST) |
Revision as of 21:15, 15 October 2009
Warning
Please do not wipe talk pages on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. -- boxy talk • teh rulz 09:51 17 March 2009 (BST)
- Shock*.... what a gay wiki.......... --Imthatguy 21:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Hai
I sees u der. --Haliman - Talk 23:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Wassup, please don't take me killing you or your friends personally, after all I AM a PKer --Imthatguy 23:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Chill. Just came to say hi. PKers are necessary for the game. But hey, I just have one request. From now on, whenever you kill anyone, give them a message. A witty comment or something. Getting killed by you without a comment isn't fun :[. Don't really see many wiki users in game, unless they're one of mine. :P --Haliman - Talk 23:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- lulz, I'll try to remember that --Imthatguy 23:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also, if you ever wanna play games on a forum, visit my group. We have a group for people who just wanna post in games, and don't have to be apart of the clan. /Me tries to get more registered members. :P. Link to the groups wiki page is the general in my sig. --Haliman - Talk 23:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah being a lone PKer is sometimes... well... lonely... --Imthatguy 23:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- lulz, I'll try to remember that --Imthatguy 23:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- http://z10.invisionfree.com/Umbrella_UBCS/index.php?showuser=151 ... Im not good with the wiki --Imthatguy 23:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
New template
[[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] [[5]] [[6]] [[7]] [[8]] [[9]]
Warning
Please do not edit another user's subpage this wiki. If you continue this behaviour, your editing privileges will be revoked. This is your last warning. Linkthewindow Talk 11:47, 6 May 2009 (BST)
Your freebeer page
It has been moved to User:Imthatguy/freebeer. Please create personal pages in your own namespace from now on, by using User:Imthatguy/Pagename. If you need any help, let me know. --Pestolence(talk) 22:00, 6 May 2009 (BST)
User:Imthatguy/antibure
You can only use images that have been uploaded onto the wiki. Sorry. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:35, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- could i download onto my computer and upload unto the wiki?
I answered you on my talk page. I'm going to go and sleep now, so I hope I answered your question correctly. Good luck. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:10, 3 July 2009 (BST)
just wanted to say im TOTALLY WITH YOUR INSPIRING CRUSADE man your like a messiah or somethign lol :P --Cyberbob 16:19, 3 July 2009 (BST)
Pathetic attempt at sarcasm --Imthatguy 16:28, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- Oh snap!--Thadeous Oakley 16:32, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- OH SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Cyberbob 02:57, 4 July 2009 (BST)
Don't you mean "Down with cats"?
I was just wondering. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:09, 3 July 2009 (BST)
No crats... and its a growing movement 3 members in 1 day --Imthatguy 19:10, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- dont make this into a joke --Imthatguy 19:19, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- I'm not nessecarily against there being Crats, i would just like for the community at large to have more of a say so --Imthatguy 20:46, 3 July 2009 (BST)
Nice template. Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 19:14, 3 July 2009 (BST)
im with you man. we will tkae them at dawn and have ANRARCHEE!!--SirArgo Talk 20:11, 3 July 2009 (BST)
- I like cats. And anarchy. --Paddy DignamIS DEAD 20:36, 3 July 2009 (BST)
Bureaucracy! | |
Still better than the alternatives. |
CARN THE CATS! -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:21 3 July 2009 (BST)
- tipped you against the sainters this week --Cyberbob 02:58, 4 July 2009 (BST)
And the Cats win! Win it ALL! -- boxy talk • teh rulz 10:42 26 September 2009 (BST)
- You havent seen the last of me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 12:47, 26 September 2009 (BST)
- shut the fuck up cunt he wasn't talking about you.Cyberbob Talk 13:00, 26 September 2009 (BST)
- grrr badmoodposting owns Cyberbob Talk 13:01, 26 September 2009 (BST)
- Anger problems?, you should seek professional help--Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 20:19, 26 September 2009 (BST)
- Harsh, but true. Cats -- boxy talk • teh rulz 03:15 27 September 2009 (BST)
- I iz cunfundled --Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 18:44, 27 September 2009 (BST)
- grrr badmoodposting owns Cyberbob Talk 13:01, 26 September 2009 (BST)
- shut the fuck up cunt he wasn't talking about you.Cyberbob Talk 13:00, 26 September 2009 (BST)
24 Hour Ban
You have been banned from this wiki for 24 hours for spamming talk pages. Further vandalism may lead to longer bans. Linkthewindow Talk 14:06, 4 July 2009 (BST)
- Thank God!!! It's about damn time.... -Poodle of doom 18:15, 5 July 2009 (BST)
Soft Warning
Don't post on the main page of A/VB. You are in no way involved with those cases, and your trivial shit is unneeded. Go ahead and play rebel, but don't muck up the admin pages in the process. The next time you post on any case you are not involved in, it will be a warning.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 21:10, 7 July 2009 (BST)
Mmmm Cookies
Thanks for the cookie... --Honestmistake 09:42, 17 July 2009 (BST)
- np.... thanks for showing me that the community still has balls --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 09:45, 17 July 2009 (BST)
- Heh, you're looking at the communities balls... :P --Dark Blue Helmet 22:11, 19 July 2009 (BST)
- lol =P --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 01:43, 20 July 2009 (BST)
- Heh, you're looking at the communities balls... :P --Dark Blue Helmet 22:11, 19 July 2009 (BST)
hai
Who the fuck are you? And why do you like Metallica? Shits gay.
Almost as gay as wiki revolution.--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 23:44, 24 August 2009 (BST)
'I am the one who is (a guy)'
I do have two metallica templates.... New shit is gay, old shit is awesome--DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 06:52, 25 August 2009 (BST)
- Old shit is meh at best.--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 20:26, 31 August 2009 (BST)
- Bull Shit.... The Black Album was the shit--DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 00:50, 10 September 2009 (BST)
- Lick mah METAL!!!! --WanYao 03:30, 12 September 2009 (BST)
- Metallica sold out ages ago, and they weren't even that good before that. If you want real thrash metal, listen to Slayer. But if you want death metal (no, I don't mean Slipknot, or Disturbed, or Avenged Sevenfold, they're all posers) listen to Death, or Morbid Angel, or the like - great stuff. But if you want technical death metal (which is the best), listen to Necrophagist, Decapitated, Atheist, Nile, Quo Vadis, Spawn of Possession...the list goes on almost indefinitely. Here are a few songs to direct you...
- Lick mah METAL!!!! --WanYao 03:30, 12 September 2009 (BST)
- Bull Shit.... The Black Album was the shit--DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 00:50, 10 September 2009 (BST)
- Stabwound, by Necrophagist - classically influenced
- Diminished to B, by Necrophagist
- Spheres of Madness, by Decapitated
- On the Shores of Ithaka, by Quo Vadis, great philosophical lyrics
- Annihilation of the Wicked, by Nile (Egyptian themed)
- Unas Slayer of the Gods, by Nile (This is the first part)
- Ithyphallic, by Nile (probably the greatest band ever)
- User Maat Re, by Nile (look at my character's profile, it comes from the lyrics in this song)
Obviously, there is much more. But this is a bit to start you off, if you're interested.
P.S. Don't listen to nu-metal (Slipknot, Disturbed, Avenged Sevenfold, Korn, etc.) It's just heavy pop, from a musician's standpoint. In contrast, technical death metal is so complex that much of it (especially Spawn of Possession) is more complex than classical music. Ralph Nader 02:53, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- Or you could grab yourself a life and listen to good shit like Short Stack. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:33, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- I sincerely hope that you're being provocative, because it would be sad indeed to have "Short Stack" in the same conversation as Necrophagist or Nile. Ralph Nader 13:54, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- It's even sadder to see that big post you just made 6 lines up. Trust me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:14, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- I was simply giving direction for anyone who wanted to try listening to technical death metal. Don't get me wrong - I didn't mean to give any disrespect to your musical taste. I said it was sad that such simple music and such complex music should be in the same discussion. I was not passing judgment on whether simple music is good or not. Ralph Nader 00:53, 11 October 2009 (BST)
- Ahh don't worry. We just joke about Short Stack where I come from because they are from our home town, and they are possibly the most hated entity in the entire region they hail from. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:00, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Oh, okay. So what do you listen to, then? Ralph Nader 00:21, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Ahh don't worry. We just joke about Short Stack where I come from because they are from our home town, and they are possibly the most hated entity in the entire region they hail from. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:00, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- I was simply giving direction for anyone who wanted to try listening to technical death metal. Don't get me wrong - I didn't mean to give any disrespect to your musical taste. I said it was sad that such simple music and such complex music should be in the same discussion. I was not passing judgment on whether simple music is good or not. Ralph Nader 00:53, 11 October 2009 (BST)
- It's even sadder to see that big post you just made 6 lines up. Trust me. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 14:14, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- I sincerely hope that you're being provocative, because it would be sad indeed to have "Short Stack" in the same conversation as Necrophagist or Nile. Ralph Nader 13:54, 10 October 2009 (BST)
You have my support
I would like you to know that you have my full support. Keep up the good work. Rebel without a clue 00:59, 9 September 2009 (BST)
- Ha...Ha...Ha... very funny.... Maybe your someone we know and thats why noone looked into who you are --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 20:19, 9 September 2009 (BST)
Politics
Since Poodle of doom has ceased to have a political discussion and has instead insulted me and Nader multiple times, and caused other grievances, I have come to your page for a real political discussion. You said that you liked Nader better than other candidates, but you did not express much enthusiasm. Thus I will ask: what is your political view? Ralph Nader 02:35, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- Pardon me Guy, I'm not looking to be a kill joy here on your talk page too.... but the very first comment you made on my talk page was an insult Ralph. Some of the comments you made later were degrading, prior to me allowing for the breakdown of communication. In fact, your first comment to guy on my talk page was an insult to him. And when the questions were asked of you, you became irate over them, and side steped all the issues,... and chose to never face the real issues. Please Do Not shift blame for your short comings to me. -Poodle of doom 04:16, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- Excuse me, but I thought you ended our talk? Please refrain from interfering with a real political discussion, if Imthatguy should agree to have it. Anyways, how was my first comment an insult? You just went to my talk page and immediately said that you hated Ralph Nader. I wanted to see what your views were - and I never insulted Imthatguy! And I challenge you to name one question I sidestepped.
- However, my question was for Imthatguy, not you, Poodle of doom. You have ended our discussion. And so I shall again ask Imthatguy: what is your political view? Ralph Nader 14:12, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- Hes defiantly not my favorite but better than the main parties nominate --Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 19:01, 13 October 2009 (BST)
- However, my question was for Imthatguy, not you, Poodle of doom. You have ended our discussion. And so I shall again ask Imthatguy: what is your political view? Ralph Nader 14:12, 10 October 2009 (BST)
- So I guess you're an independent...what is your political belief? Ralph Nader 21:36, 13 October 2009 (BST)
- EDIT: I just checked your user page, and I can see that you're a libertarian. I find that most intriguing...I'm not a libertarian, obviously, but I don't know much about the concept - except that I think Neal Peart is one, and your trick message leads to Rush's site. Would you care to explain some of libertarianism's ideology?
- P.S. You fooled me with your fake message, in case you're wondering.
- P.P.S. Are you a propertarian or non-propertarian, politically? Just curious. Ralph Nader 00:37, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Libertarianism promotes social harmony through providing as much personal liberty as possible and as least government as possible (I could get into my personal beliefs on the subject of government if you wish so), i am of the propertarian variety but not of the anarcho-capitalist variety if the corporations ran amuck they would enslave us all, Mainly i would vote for Nader to bring down the two party system which has monopolized political power for far too long, But in general i respect his forward thinking while despising some of the more populist parts of his platform (as you possibly know populism and libertarianism are opposed to each other in varying degrees on most subjects--Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 17:52, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- Thank god I've finally found someone to have a political discussion with. Being an independent (as I'm guessing you are), you probably know how difficult it is to find someone else who dislikes the two-party system. I guess there is no getting around the fact that I'm a populist and you a libertarian - but we both hate the current system. I wonder...have you ever considered a change in the current voting system? Such as a proportional representation? I haven't found many independents, so I'm wondering what your views on that are.
- Libertarianism promotes social harmony through providing as much personal liberty as possible and as least government as possible (I could get into my personal beliefs on the subject of government if you wish so), i am of the propertarian variety but not of the anarcho-capitalist variety if the corporations ran amuck they would enslave us all, Mainly i would vote for Nader to bring down the two party system which has monopolized political power for far too long, But in general i respect his forward thinking while despising some of the more populist parts of his platform (as you possibly know populism and libertarianism are opposed to each other in varying degrees on most subjects--Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 17:52, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- But I still have a few questions. How would the law be upheld in a libertarianism, at least from your point of view? I suppose you'd want transportation, education, and health insurance paid for...and do you believe in a strong national defense? I don't know how you'd do so with such low taxes...but then, I really don't know much about libertarianism. To be honest, I can hardly imagine a libertarian society, but I guess that's because I've grown up in a government-controlled country. Also, how would you escape a class system in which the poor are stuck in the lower class and the rich in the higher class? And whom do you vote for, in presidential elections?
- Thanks (in advance) for clarifying, and answering my questions. If I somehow offend you in any way, please tell me...I was just in a discussion on Poodle of doom's talk page, and he got very angry at me for some reason. He still is. Ralph Nader 21:50, 14 October 2009 (BST)
- The views on said subjects vary from libertarian to libertarian, but in my personal brand i do support proportional representation (but in ways your probably not thinking of), i think government should build roads but eminent domain should not be a power of the state, education should probably be privatized, with grants going to the poor, I'm 50/50 about heathcare but most libertarians prefer privatization, deregulation, and detaxation(a word of my own invention), and (some of this is libertarian rhetoric some of it my own) the two biggest problems with the gap widening between the haves and have-nots is (1)taxes, the richest 5-15% dont pay them because they use overseas tax shelters but the small business man can't and gets taxed out of his ass, (2) (personal view)the trade deficit the elite keep their factories out of the country that would employ the bottom 10% for cheaper labor elsewhere (naturally i support a tariff)--Imthatguy is on the wiki looking at ur pagez 19:39, 15 October 2009 (BST)
- So I guess that makes sense...I completely agree with you about the rich keeping factories outside of the U.S. in places like China, where there is cheap and child labor; thus, I would also support a tariff. I find your first reason, though (the one about overseas tax shelters) quite intriguing; perhaps you can explain in more detail. I do, however, agree that small business owners are being taxed too much, so I didn't agree with Obama on his 250K+ tax - many of the huge corporate executives that I despise are in that range, but I would rather that they be punished for corruption than be taxed like that, where you say that they can escape taxes.
- But then you also say that you support a proportional representation, but not of the kind I'm thinking of - what kind are you thinking of? And whom do you vote for, come presidential elections?
- P.S. Maybe we should stop indenting our posts, we're taking up a lot of space. Please say if you agree in your next post. Ralph Nader 22:15, 15 October 2009 (BST)