User talk:DanceDanceRevolution: Difference between revisions
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
:::::::::If you wanted to be taken seriously you wouldn't pounce on ONE tiny comment, assume the worse and take someone to arbitration over it (especially since you were the [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Poodle_of_doom&diff=prev&oldid=1940684 first of us to mention] our history not I). And taking into account your history with arbitration and other metaphorical self-immolation tactics you've used in the past, IMO it's safe to assume the time for taking you seriously is over for now. At least to those whos opinions actually matter wiki-wise. I don't want to have anything to do with you being taken seriously and I'd probably argue that I never did. You are the master of your own destiny and I don't have any interest whatsoever in intervening with that. It was ONE comment, just build a bridge, get over it, and be happy enough that I'm happy to walk away from my personal issues with you and leave you be rather than try and get under your skin for months on end. | :::::::::If you wanted to be taken seriously you wouldn't pounce on ONE tiny comment, assume the worse and take someone to arbitration over it (especially since you were the [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User:Poodle_of_doom&diff=prev&oldid=1940684 first of us to mention] our history not I). And taking into account your history with arbitration and other metaphorical self-immolation tactics you've used in the past, IMO it's safe to assume the time for taking you seriously is over for now. At least to those whos opinions actually matter wiki-wise. I don't want to have anything to do with you being taken seriously and I'd probably argue that I never did. You are the master of your own destiny and I don't have any interest whatsoever in intervening with that. It was ONE comment, just build a bridge, get over it, and be happy enough that I'm happy to walk away from my personal issues with you and leave you be rather than try and get under your skin for months on end. | ||
:::::::::Really I still have no idea why the arbitration case even exists, lest why you think its the best option. It's worth noting that its totally uncalled for since things have only gotten BETTER between us since your ones a year ago that fell through. I have no interest in taking it seriously or co-operating with it in any way -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 07:35, 26 September 2011 (BST) | :::::::::Really I still have no idea why the arbitration case even exists, lest why you think its the best option. It's worth noting that its totally uncalled for since things have only gotten BETTER between us since your ones a year ago that fell through. I have no interest in taking it seriously or co-operating with it in any way -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 07:35, 26 September 2011 (BST) | ||
::::::::::I do suppose there was that, though it was my attempt at humor. When I left, you did say that I would be back, and would form another group. I did. It' my way of saying you were right, which you were, and still are. The fact of the matter is, the comment on the SD page simply wasn't right. But I digress. It's cheap of me to mention it again, soley based on the fact that an apology has been issued for said statement, and as such, I should disregard it for the sake of sanity. Regardless, of your position, I am looking to move forward. I'd love to have you there, but I suppose it's not necessary. Thanks for speaking with me, and sorry my attempts to difuse the situation failed your expectations, and have angered you. -{{User:Poodle of doom/sig4}} 19:59, 26 September 2011 (BST) |
Revision as of 18:59, 26 September 2011
|
cause that what we call them round here!
dude, just leave it as spambits. whats the big fucking deal? it's our inside joke. the page still functions as designed. i'm just going to keep reverting it till you take me VB and i really doubt that case would go anywhere. xoxoxoox still luv you tho. --User:Sexualharrison21:06, 3 July 2011 (bst)
- If you really want to be that gay then fine, I won't stop anyone but the more it's forced the less funny it gets. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 03:02, 4 July 2011 (BST)
- coming from the queen of the gays that means a lot. kiss kiss.--User:Sexualharrison03:48, 4 July 2011 (bst)
- Actually I will. This is an admin page and this is your equivalent warning that it's not ok to change it on a whim because of a "joke". --Karekmaps 2.0?! 06:21, 4 July 2011 (BST)
- Unsurprisingly ditto.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 09:47, 4 July 2011 (BST)
- eat my shorts.--User:Sexualharrison11:43, 4 July 2011 (bst)
- Unsurprisingly ditto.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 09:47, 4 July 2011 (BST)
dohohoho
Because we don't really consider it a success? 16:32, 9 July 2011 (BST)
- Aw man, my poor feelings. I'll go cry in a corner now. No, seriously. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:37, 9 July 2011 (BST)
It was me that was supposed to have done it too -.- and no one corrected me -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 16:42, 9 July 2011 (BST)
- I forgive you. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 9 July 2011 (BST)
Banned Alt Page Scheduled
Hey I was going on a janitorial spree and thought I'd tackle some scheduled deletion of banned alt user pages. For some reason it occurred to me to check the voting behind the scheduled and I noticed something. In the vote it mentions user page mustn't be linked anywhere except on A/VB or A/VB/B. It didn't occur to me while deleting to check what links here for the pages I deleted since it only mentions no contirbutions showing. Anyway it was kind of a dumb mistake not checking the what links here but really just wondering if these pages are still considered valid scheduled deletions. ~ 17:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, some of them still have one or two occasional and meaningless links (obviously, else you wouldn't be here), but I would hardly press for a reversal. Maybe User:Hunk apple because he appears on Witch Hunters page, and it might be worth leaving the page there to demonstrate why he was burned as a witch? Just my two cents, beyond that almost all of the rule-invalidating links that go to those users are janitorial or referral links which we often have had the right to disregard when qualifying a page for a scheduled or speedy. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:30, 13 July 2011 (BST)
- Alright, well there's loads more where they came from so if it is pretty much considered consensus that janitorial type links can be disregarded I'll just run with it. I guess if there are any other questionable pages I can just put it up on A/SD and if anyone else has a problem, they can
kiss my asstake it to A/M. ~ 15:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, well there's loads more where they came from so if it is pretty much considered consensus that janitorial type links can be disregarded I'll just run with it. I guess if there are any other questionable pages I can just put it up on A/SD and if anyone else has a problem, they can
Warning
Please do not vandalize this wiki with that stick up your tight ass. Continuing this behavior may lead to bad constipation.-JohnnyCakes 11:11, 17 July 2011 (BST)
- That's not a stick, it's Cornholio's finger. 17:05, 17 July 2011 (BST)
- wrong again! It's my hand. You're all meatpuppets. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:17, 18 July 2011 (BST)
status
I would like a the status thing. Arg... on my phone... User:Scout
G+
I have added you to my Circle of Shame. Just thought you should know. Cheers. ~ 20:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Raeg
Vapor, you are becoming inactive. This is simply unacceptable, and I demand that you return to 100million edits a day.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 17:26, 4 August 2011 (BST)
- Still check the wiki, lots. lots, RC is still my homepage. But I've had bigger fish to fry lately unfortunately -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:10, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Alright, I'll bite. When did Yon start calling DDR Vapor? This is not the first time I've seen Yon do this. I suspect I missed an irc joke or something. ~ 06:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- its the first time i've seen it, I don't know what it's supposed to mean. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:31, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Perhaps Yon is simply struggling to reshape his image as most humourless sysop. ~ 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Like the thad persecution I think the humourless yon thing is a bit blown out of proportion. especially when most of us have a shit sense of humour to begin with.. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:56, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Obviously you do otherwise you'd have known I was joking :p. Or maybe that means I'm not funny. No, fuck that. I'm a funny mother fucker. ~ 07:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. It would be more of a reflection that I have no sense of humour than you I'd think ahah. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:02, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- I do agree that the Thad thing got out of hand, though it doesn't help much that he has done very little with the buttons since his promotion.~ 07:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Read this.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 09:16, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- I do agree that the Thad thing got out of hand, though it doesn't help much that he has done very little with the buttons since his promotion.~ 07:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. It would be more of a reflection that I have no sense of humour than you I'd think ahah. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:02, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Obviously you do otherwise you'd have known I was joking :p. Or maybe that means I'm not funny. No, fuck that. I'm a funny mother fucker. ~ 07:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Like the thad persecution I think the humourless yon thing is a bit blown out of proportion. especially when most of us have a shit sense of humour to begin with.. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:56, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Perhaps Yon is simply struggling to reshape his image as most humourless sysop. ~ 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- its the first time i've seen it, I don't know what it's supposed to mean. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 06:31, 5 August 2011 (BST)
- Alright, I'll bite. When did Yon start calling DDR Vapor? This is not the first time I've seen Yon do this. I suspect I missed an irc joke or something. ~ 06:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello.
Yes i log on here aswell as another handful of games.
I log in 2-3 times a day and am looking to join a clan/group and wondered if i could join you guys hopefully picking a couple of tips up along the way...?
Thanks for reading, Liam.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Contains nuts (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- Hey Liam, I assume you mean if you're talking to me that you mean ~EVIL~. If so, I'm afraid my better half and I, who make up Every Villain Is Lemons, have stopped playing temporarily. It's a phase thing for us. But if you're interested in a bunch of groups that may be able to help you out, I recommend any group that features on Recruitment page. Good luck mate, whether or not you go with a group, hopefully you'll understand the game soon and remember, there's always plenty of help or guidance on the wiki. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:19, 25 August 2011 (BST)
thought of you when i saw this for some reason
--User:Sexualharrison12:03, 25 August 2011 (bst)
- I'm not black... but I did have a spouse or two taken by the hordes. Thanks! -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 13:31, 25 August 2011 (BST)
- are you sure you are not black? xD --User:Sexualharrison15:12, 25 August 2011 (bst)
ARE YOU SURE
I was going to do you and Yon at the same time. --"Workshed" 11:18, 26 August 2011 (BST)
- Whoa. you might need a fair bit of lube for that. (yeah i'm sure bru) -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 14:44, 26 August 2011 (BST)
- no ur not. U stay. U play. --hagnat 15:44, 26 August 2011 (BST)
Hi
Can you help me out a little on the forum aspect of the game please?
I can't get to grips with it properly... thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Contains nuts (talk • contribs) at an unknown time.
- Not sure whatcha mean here. UDWiki or Urban Dead don't have official forums (that are in use, I think some were made years ago and were never accessed). The active forums belong to proper groups or organisations. They aren't official. They are located here or by just searching "forum" in the sidebar. You can register there, post, request to join a certain group and engage in discussions related to the game. I don't go on forums so I don't know the ins and outs of them, you'd be much better off posting a topic on one of them if you want help understanding. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:23, 29 August 2011 (BST)
MMI
Yo, email me a list of potential invites for the Manhunt Masters Invitational.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 13:22, 1 September 2011 (BST)
Yo, let's coordinate our invites with the others just to make sure we don't happen to send duplicate recommendations. I offer up Organization XIII's irc channel (server: irc.nexuswar.net, channel: #OrgXIII) for our coordination. Organization XIII is low on members, so that channel's not really in use at the moment. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 20:01, 1 September 2011 (BST)
- I'm banned from Nexuswar because of ongoing butthurt from Jorm. I'll support any people you guys invite. Obvs my preference would be a return of any of the Manhunt All-Stars but beyond that I'm not fussy. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:53, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- lol--User:Sexualharrison08:48, 2 September 2011 (bst)
- No, the point is the people with the most nominations get in, if you all nominate hundreds of people, then there'll be no way to know who to put in. :/ If you want to co-ordinate three people and a back-up then that would be awesome.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:54, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- If I understand it correctly, each of us have 3 invites. Why go with the least amount of folks when you can max it at 18? Of course, Zipo did say that Sophie and Kempy might not be able to attend... :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:37, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- I'm pretty sure that only 3 total will be invited and that's based on input from the seeds. That's why it's called an invitational. BTW I'll be an event planner on at least one of the qualifying events and likely won't be participating in the hunt (I don't think MH planners should participate in their own events) so y'all should just go ahead and invite me :) ~ 18:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Vapor has it correct. There will only be three (maybe four, dependant on another thing that's happening) invites, and they will be the most popular from among the seeds suggestions.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:02, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- In that case, all seeds should still coordinate to see which 3-4 folks we would like to invite. It's gonna be quite a difficult decision (seeing that everyone probably have their own invites in mind and whatnot). From my discussion with Tash in irc, I think we might end up with at least 6 or 7 invites. She has 3 SDN-ers in mind. Coincidentally, I happen to have two of those SDN-ers in mind. I'm almost certain Al's invites involves at least 1 or 2 SDN-ers as well. DDR here wants MHAS-ers, which I'm almost certain Ross would probably want to bring in some MHAS-ers as well...Zipo did state in irc that Kempy and Sophie might not be able to join, so I'm not entirely too certain who he'll pick...CAPD-ers, perhaps? All in all, I place my money on at least 6 or 7 folks getting tied for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd popular votes. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:20, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- Ey, hang on, I wasn't here the last couple months and only just found out about this the other day. I spoke to YoKo on email yesterday about jumping on, so aye, I'm in if there's still a spot? And I'll certainly try and seduce Soph into playing along too, although I can't guarantee or speak for her atm. So... get me name on that list. Flashy teeth guy, naturally. Y'all getting chomped to buggery this time. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 22:11, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- Yeah, I accepted Kempy as a late seventh seed (he was originally going to be seeded 4th), and so he'll naturally help decide invites. Sophie too, if she changes her mind. But yeah, I don't care how it happens, but so long as I get a list of three people and a couple of back-ups for mitigating circumstances, I'll be happy. Oh, and so that you know, ZIPO sent me a couple of recommendations a day or two ago, which were: Luke the least, Dante Bosch, Bobby Pegleg. Consider these as well while you all make decisions. :p --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:55, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- Ey, hang on, I wasn't here the last couple months and only just found out about this the other day. I spoke to YoKo on email yesterday about jumping on, so aye, I'm in if there's still a spot? And I'll certainly try and seduce Soph into playing along too, although I can't guarantee or speak for her atm. So... get me name on that list. Flashy teeth guy, naturally. Y'all getting chomped to buggery this time. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 22:11, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- In that case, all seeds should still coordinate to see which 3-4 folks we would like to invite. It's gonna be quite a difficult decision (seeing that everyone probably have their own invites in mind and whatnot). From my discussion with Tash in irc, I think we might end up with at least 6 or 7 invites. She has 3 SDN-ers in mind. Coincidentally, I happen to have two of those SDN-ers in mind. I'm almost certain Al's invites involves at least 1 or 2 SDN-ers as well. DDR here wants MHAS-ers, which I'm almost certain Ross would probably want to bring in some MHAS-ers as well...Zipo did state in irc that Kempy and Sophie might not be able to join, so I'm not entirely too certain who he'll pick...CAPD-ers, perhaps? All in all, I place my money on at least 6 or 7 folks getting tied for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd popular votes. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:20, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- Vapor has it correct. There will only be three (maybe four, dependant on another thing that's happening) invites, and they will be the most popular from among the seeds suggestions.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:02, 2 September 2011 (BST)
- I'm pretty sure that only 3 total will be invited and that's based on input from the seeds. That's why it's called an invitational. BTW I'll be an event planner on at least one of the qualifying events and likely won't be participating in the hunt (I don't think MH planners should participate in their own events) so y'all should just go ahead and invite me :) ~ 18:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- If I understand it correctly, each of us have 3 invites. Why go with the least amount of folks when you can max it at 18? Of course, Zipo did say that Sophie and Kempy might not be able to attend... :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:37, 2 September 2011 (BST)
Question
I don't suppose I could ask you to play nice if I leave you well enough alone can I? -Poodle of DoomT*C 00:43, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- What the fuck is this? You call me an antagonist but come back and within 5 contributions you've already taken me to arbitration. How is that leaving me alone 'well enough'? Is the arbitration simply a means to threaten me? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:47, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Well, as you've admitted, I've been back for all of what? Five contibutions, and you've already began with old bullshit again? Had it not been for this, would it still be continuing now? Seriously dude, I don't care what your deal is with me, it's time that this stops. I'd like to put it behind us. That's all I want. Do you wish to take part in arbitration, or not? If you do, then we can use Yonnua. -Poodle of DoomT*C 15:30, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Stop what? It hasn't started. Nothing's started. The only thing that's started is an arbitration case from you claiming hostility. If you want everything to be fucking dandy and full of rainbows and unicorns watch a Disney movie. This is the internet. Now fuck off and learn to take a quick joke, else things will get alot worse. I come here like once or twice a week. I don't come here much anymore and don't give a shit about what goes on. If you wanna give me a reason to go back here, however, I'm more than tempted to come back and pester you. So just fuck off and stop being such a butthurt faggot and claiming victimisation. I said 'IT'S BEGUN' because you made a request and completely fucked up the header because you are shit at formatting and headers. Don't say you're not cause you are, it's a given. Maybe instead of crying you should learn to make things easier for the other users of this wiki by not fucking up and making little annoying mistakes to begin with. THAT'S what I meant. You thinking I meant something else is nothing other than you projecting your own insecurities and guilt, I'd assume. Cause it has nothing to do with me. Now fuck off and watch your disney movie, cry over Mufasa or fucking hate on Gaston or something cause you'll get a much less hostile reaction from them that you'll get from me if you push my buttons. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:57, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- As I said before, I want nothing more than to put this behind us. I'm sorry for whatever I've done. I thought you were playing at everything that went down the last time I left. I'm sorry for making you angry. As I said in the arby, I'm simply here on a limited bases. As far as I'm concerned, if it doesn't directly deal with my group, I won't be on here at all. Sorry for irritating you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 16:01, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Alright in that case I'm sorry for worrying you and bringing out the worst in both of us just now. I barely come here either, and when I do I just like to have fun. Let's just be on our way and have fun while we're at it yeah? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:40, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- You know what, Apology Accepted. However, in light of having put up the latest arby, I would like to see it through. I'm really trying not to be that guy anymore. Normally, I'm a little bullheaded to begin with, and more so when stressed (regardless of the reason). I hope you understand, I'm not trying to urk you, and I'm just trying not to be prodded anymore. I'm really not up for the politics, and petty bullshit. I do believe that I'm above that, and I'm sure you feel the same in regards to yourself. So, lets do the arbitration, and have ourselves a defusing session. Who knows what we'll gain from it. -Poodle of DoomT*C 04:15, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- No fucking way. Arbitration is only going to exacerbate things more. I don't know why you'd wanna try and ease things but try and coerce me into such an obnoxious arbitration case. I don't spend the amount of time here to make an arbitration case worthwhile. Lets just ignore each other, seriously -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:19, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- As much as it may be to our mutual dismay, I do believe it would be mutually beneficial to clear the air, and be done with it. At that, I wish to be taken seriously, even if only slightly more so, in the future. Filing the request, and promptly pulling it accomplishes nothing, and taints any credibility I have any hopes of reestablishing. But I digress, this will be the overall agreement in the future, going forward. It would be to ignore each other for a period of time, and refrain from hostility as much as possible going forward after that. I'm not sure how you think things will be exacerbated by this. Obviously there was tension in the past. It seems to me, though I've attempted to do nothing to offend you (or anyone else), that there still is tension. In regards to that, I'd really like to put it all behind us as much as possible, and think it would be a way to clear the air? Do you have a suggestion as an alternitive to arbitration? Alas, I'm prodding now, which is what I levied in my original talks with you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 06:27, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- If you wanted to be taken seriously you wouldn't pounce on ONE tiny comment, assume the worse and take someone to arbitration over it (especially since you were the first of us to mention our history not I). And taking into account your history with arbitration and other metaphorical self-immolation tactics you've used in the past, IMO it's safe to assume the time for taking you seriously is over for now. At least to those whos opinions actually matter wiki-wise. I don't want to have anything to do with you being taken seriously and I'd probably argue that I never did. You are the master of your own destiny and I don't have any interest whatsoever in intervening with that. It was ONE comment, just build a bridge, get over it, and be happy enough that I'm happy to walk away from my personal issues with you and leave you be rather than try and get under your skin for months on end.
- Really I still have no idea why the arbitration case even exists, lest why you think its the best option. It's worth noting that its totally uncalled for since things have only gotten BETTER between us since your ones a year ago that fell through. I have no interest in taking it seriously or co-operating with it in any way -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 07:35, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- I do suppose there was that, though it was my attempt at humor. When I left, you did say that I would be back, and would form another group. I did. It' my way of saying you were right, which you were, and still are. The fact of the matter is, the comment on the SD page simply wasn't right. But I digress. It's cheap of me to mention it again, soley based on the fact that an apology has been issued for said statement, and as such, I should disregard it for the sake of sanity. Regardless, of your position, I am looking to move forward. I'd love to have you there, but I suppose it's not necessary. Thanks for speaking with me, and sorry my attempts to difuse the situation failed your expectations, and have angered you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 19:59, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- As much as it may be to our mutual dismay, I do believe it would be mutually beneficial to clear the air, and be done with it. At that, I wish to be taken seriously, even if only slightly more so, in the future. Filing the request, and promptly pulling it accomplishes nothing, and taints any credibility I have any hopes of reestablishing. But I digress, this will be the overall agreement in the future, going forward. It would be to ignore each other for a period of time, and refrain from hostility as much as possible going forward after that. I'm not sure how you think things will be exacerbated by this. Obviously there was tension in the past. It seems to me, though I've attempted to do nothing to offend you (or anyone else), that there still is tension. In regards to that, I'd really like to put it all behind us as much as possible, and think it would be a way to clear the air? Do you have a suggestion as an alternitive to arbitration? Alas, I'm prodding now, which is what I levied in my original talks with you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 06:27, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- No fucking way. Arbitration is only going to exacerbate things more. I don't know why you'd wanna try and ease things but try and coerce me into such an obnoxious arbitration case. I don't spend the amount of time here to make an arbitration case worthwhile. Lets just ignore each other, seriously -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 05:19, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- You know what, Apology Accepted. However, in light of having put up the latest arby, I would like to see it through. I'm really trying not to be that guy anymore. Normally, I'm a little bullheaded to begin with, and more so when stressed (regardless of the reason). I hope you understand, I'm not trying to urk you, and I'm just trying not to be prodded anymore. I'm really not up for the politics, and petty bullshit. I do believe that I'm above that, and I'm sure you feel the same in regards to yourself. So, lets do the arbitration, and have ourselves a defusing session. Who knows what we'll gain from it. -Poodle of DoomT*C 04:15, 26 September 2011 (BST)
- Alright in that case I'm sorry for worrying you and bringing out the worst in both of us just now. I barely come here either, and when I do I just like to have fun. Let's just be on our way and have fun while we're at it yeah? -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:40, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- As I said before, I want nothing more than to put this behind us. I'm sorry for whatever I've done. I thought you were playing at everything that went down the last time I left. I'm sorry for making you angry. As I said in the arby, I'm simply here on a limited bases. As far as I'm concerned, if it doesn't directly deal with my group, I won't be on here at all. Sorry for irritating you. -Poodle of DoomT*C 16:01, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Stop what? It hasn't started. Nothing's started. The only thing that's started is an arbitration case from you claiming hostility. If you want everything to be fucking dandy and full of rainbows and unicorns watch a Disney movie. This is the internet. Now fuck off and learn to take a quick joke, else things will get alot worse. I come here like once or twice a week. I don't come here much anymore and don't give a shit about what goes on. If you wanna give me a reason to go back here, however, I'm more than tempted to come back and pester you. So just fuck off and stop being such a butthurt faggot and claiming victimisation. I said 'IT'S BEGUN' because you made a request and completely fucked up the header because you are shit at formatting and headers. Don't say you're not cause you are, it's a given. Maybe instead of crying you should learn to make things easier for the other users of this wiki by not fucking up and making little annoying mistakes to begin with. THAT'S what I meant. You thinking I meant something else is nothing other than you projecting your own insecurities and guilt, I'd assume. Cause it has nothing to do with me. Now fuck off and watch your disney movie, cry over Mufasa or fucking hate on Gaston or something cause you'll get a much less hostile reaction from them that you'll get from me if you push my buttons. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 15:57, 24 September 2011 (BST)
- Well, as you've admitted, I've been back for all of what? Five contibutions, and you've already began with old bullshit again? Had it not been for this, would it still be continuing now? Seriously dude, I don't care what your deal is with me, it's time that this stops. I'd like to put it behind us. That's all I want. Do you wish to take part in arbitration, or not? If you do, then we can use Yonnua. -Poodle of DoomT*C 15:30, 24 September 2011 (BST)