UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Spiderzed/2011-07-23 Re-Evaluation

Administration » Sysop Archives » Spiderzed » 2011-07-23 Re-Evaluation

User:Spiderzed

• Spiderzed (talk | contribs | UDWiki contribs | logs1 | logs2 | vndl data | sysop archive)

Looking how I have already collected a good bit of misconduct cases, I am going to put up my RE early. Like I promised in my promotion bid, I was mostly going to do what I do already on the wiki, just with more buttons, and I think I have achieved that. Apart from the standard stuff like handling A/SD, I was especially active in policy discussion, in the discussion of off-site requests (that sadly remained unresolved), in maintaining Category:Recruitment during Mis' absence, and in keeping Project Funny from going completely belly up.

To get the technicalities out of the way:

1. Yes, I had at least 1 edit in the past 3 months.
2. Yes, I had more than 50 edits since my promotion.
3. Yes, I am willing to continue plagueing the wiki with my special button access.

-- Spiderzed█ 16:05, 23 July 2011 (BST)

• Question What have you learned about being a sop since your promotion? --Rosslessness 16:29, 23 July 2011 (BST)

  1.) You _will_ get drawn into drama, unless you work really hard on staying out of it. 2.) People _will_ try to frame you for misconduct, regardless of how accountable and honourable you think you use your powers. The only way to escape it is to never do anything only a sys-op can do. But where would be the sense in that? 3.) The buttons are a nice-to-have, but not decisive. 90% of your job can be done without it, and 90% of the button use is the dumb "color by numbers" stuff like C7/8 A/SD, cycling suggestions or bot banning. -- Spiderzed█ 17:15, 23 July 2011 (BST)

• Abstain - Yet to make up my mind.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 17:27, 23 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch -You can fight like a krogan, run like a leopard, but you'll never be better than commander Shepherd. --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 18:36, 23 July 2011 (BST)
• strong vouch pedo, nazi killer, dislikes thad, makes fun of yon. unfair and biased as a good sysop should be. --User:Sexualharrison19:06, 23 July 2011 (bst)
• Vouch The misconduct stuff is pretty standard and almost like a right of passage. Hell you put one of them up yourself for accidentally blocking Seagull instead of a bot. I know you were acting on precedent and that actully speaks well of your character. As for the most recent case, common sense tells me that it was just an honest mistake (and a minor one). You're handling well the responsibility given to you. Don't change too much, maybe think a few things through or ask a second opinion before taking certain actions. ~ _{01:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)}
• Vouch - If you haven't picked up a few misconduct cases during your term as a sysop then you probably haven't done anything. No complaints on anything else you've done so that's a vouch.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 03:51, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch - Spidezed is a bro. Good and well rounded op. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 06:26, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Uber-Vouch - this is a no-brainer. He's shown good judgement and rules knowledge, and the fact that he put himself up for misconduct for accidently blocking me speaks volumes for his overall attitude towards sysophood. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ ^talk 08:39, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Vote for president Vouch - I vouched at his pm bid, and my opinion of him hasn't changed much. -- †  talk ? f.u. 11:35, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch --^A_O^R_D^M_O^P_R^I _! ^T 17:04, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Against -- But only because nobody else will vote against Spiderzed and in the interests of a fair and even conflict someone /should/. So consider this more of a vouch than an against, but just named against for the sake of all the vouches. --Ash  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 17:40, 24 July 2011 (BST)
• Strong Vouch - But only barely, since he clearly did not take my prior criticism to heart in his original nomination, though he at least had the decency to open a dialog with me over it, since it is a MAJOR issue. Even so, virtually no change has occurred, so it's like he's wallowing in it now. Flaunting it, really, just to bother me. I consider this to be a major issue that puts his entire re-evaluation at risk, and rightfully so. Stop laughing. I'm not kidding. This is serious. Seriously. —Aichon— 00:51, 25 July 2011 (BST)
• Vouch We need janitor-savy sysops like Spiderzed to compensate for lazy fucks like myself. Keep doing the work I'm not, the community thanks you and so do I. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 00:43, 31 July 2011 (BST)

Come your next A/RE, I'm so using this against you. --Ash  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 23:49, 31 July 2011 (BST)

After a brief consultation we've decided that the re-evaluation has been Successful. Thanks. --Rosslessness 11:30, 31 July 2011 (BST)