UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(601 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


Line 8: Line 8:
===Request===
===Request===
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Effects of demotion''' - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|their term]].


After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]].
After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|archive]].


===Inactivity===
===Inactivity===
Line 22: Line 23:
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.


==Requests for demotion still needing to be processed==
==Demotions in process==
====[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]]====
<!--  
Uni is picking up more than I expected it to, so things are not looking like they're going to pick up on the activity front any time soon. I don't want to become another Swiers so I'll just cut things off now. Sorry for making everyone go through the rigamarole of my confirmation process recently. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
''There are no active demotions.''
:No, cyberbob! Don't go! We neeeed you!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 13:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
-->
::It's midnight in Kangarooland, he's drunk and forgotten that SA already did the demote while drunk and repromotion schtick recently. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
===[[User:Rosslessness]]===
:::This statement is backed up by the fact that he posted his demotion request in the wrong place.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 13:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
{{bid|Rosslessness}}
::::Not drunk, posted it in the wrong spot as I've never paid a huge amount of attention to this page before {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
:::::Ah well. Just wait for a sysop to come and demote you then. :( Now we'll never have Cyberbob as crat...--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 13:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
::::::<nowiki>:(</nowiki> {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:22, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
::::::I'd be a shit crat anyways {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 16:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
:::::::We'll never know if you're demoted, which is why the 'crats should just deny your demotion. Besides, uni is temporary, but UD is forever. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 18:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
::::::::For-ever.... stay here.... for-ever... --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 18:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
:::::::You honestly can't be a worse crat then...OH SNAP. Too bad you have to go though. I guess I can at the very least wish you the best of luck with Uni and other future endeavors.  --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
You made us go through the whole re-evaluation thing for nothing? I feel dead inside. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
:Anyway. If things get tough, consider a ban request as well. Worked wonders when I was in a similar position. :0 --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


Alrighty, you know it's coming: you sure? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
::I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the [[Wikipedia:Ship of Theseus|Ship of Theseus]], a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


==Recent Actions==
==Recent Actions==
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]]''.
<!--
''There are no recent actions''
-->
''There are no recent actions''
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS MESSAGE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS MESSAGE -->
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|Sysop Archives]] and the [[:Category:Demotions_Archives|relevant category]].''
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}}
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}}

Latest revision as of 23:17, 1 December 2022

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.

Guidelines for Demotion Requests

Request

System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.

  • Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
  • Effects of demotion - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of their term.

After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.

Inactivity

Crystal Clear app xmag.png main article: Policy Text

  • A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
  • One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
  • This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
  • The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
  • Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
  • If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.

Demotions in process

User:Rosslessness

4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the Ship of Theseus, a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Recent Actions

There are no recent actions


Older actions can be found in the Sysop Archives and the relevant category.


Sysop Activity Check

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-14 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)