UDWiki:Administration/Promotions

Shortcut:
A/PM

Candidates currently under community discussion

User:Suicidalangel

I'm putting Suicidalangel up for evaluation as per his biannual promise to the community.

SA has been a sysop for 6 months, and has been a member of the community for years longer. He's been a crat for almost 3 months. As a good user does, he's helped shape/create a few policies here and there in the past, and has mostly a cool head when it comes to drama. He is often active, and always puts his all into helping out with the wiki, in all its parts.

When he can't make it to the computer because of real-life issues, he makes a continued effort to ensure his responsibilities are met punctually through other users. This evaluation bid is an example. He takes this place seriously and has always tried to help out users that need it.

SA's bit

Sorry everyone for having this go on while I'm still a 'crat, but not only did I make a promise to do it, you all knew about it before you voted me into that office. Not my fault. :P

Now, to add on to what DDR said, I don't always put my all into every part of the community. That's simply not possible for me, nor would I try to butt into an area that's best left to someone who's better at it. Like Danger Reports. That's a place I try to avoid as much as possible, because while I'm pretty decent at coding and doing the mindless tasks associated with that area, I know others, like Rooster, are better. None the less, I do try to come and do what I can when I can. But we're all human, so a lot of things don't always happen as planned. I've got a few policies up, and a few more in the burner (also known as a misplaced flash drive) that will be put up as soon as the right conditions are met (read as: when I have more time). Tryin' to be a bit more active on the Dev. sug. page. Though I'm already wanting to quit using it again. ><

I admit that I don't get as much done as everyone else does when it comes to moving, deleting, and protecting pages, but I do have to say in my defence that their seems to be a lot more activity around here during my sleepy tiem than there is when I'm up. Damn aussies and brits. :/

If you have any questions, ask.

Also, if anyone is confused as to the procedures of this, it's pretty simple. I either keep my status as 'op, and current 'crat for the rest of my term, or I get demoted from both. Then another 'crat vote comes up. Nothing to it amirite?

--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:24, 31 July 2009 (BST)

Oh, and sorry about it being a teeny bit late. I had to have DDR do it because I was at work from 2 pm to 3 am. :( --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:26, 31 July 2009 (BST)

• Vouch - As always, for me, a vouch comes with trust. I trust SA. --ϑϑℜ 07:42, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  Thanks for doing this DDR, but wouldn't it have been better off to wait until SA isn't a 'crat any more (so one user doesn't have to make the decision?) Linkthewindow  Talk  07:45, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  He asked me to do this at this time. He'll be adding his own paragraph to the bid tomorrow. --ϑϑℜ 07:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  I was sure he would anyway, but I'm still not sure if it's a good idea :/. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:56, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  You should talk to him then. I am simply fulfilling his request, as he wants his evaluation bid in on time. In US it's still the 29th. --ϑϑℜ 07:59, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  I know, and I doubt I'll convince him now (especially considering this bid is already under way. It's just that I don't like the idea that one crat can evaluate the other one (without any outside input from another crat,) and they'll be confusion in the (rather unlikely) event that he gets demoted. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:38, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  Boxy and grim I'm pretty sure have promoted or judged people on their own before.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:28, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  I know, but it's something I'll rather avoid if it's possible. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:36, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  Too late!--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 07:46, 31 July 2009 (BST)

• fucking no way--CyberRead240 10:04, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - Although, if he gets demoted... and DDR gets banned then it would be Nubis' time to shine! Yeah, it's gonna be a vouch for the greater good.--– Nubis ^NWO 13:17, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  I'd self ban for that. The future looks bright already! --ϑϑℜ 13:25, 30 July 2009 (BST)

• Vouch - Don't really feel the need to elaborate. --Cyberbob 13:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch Not much to say, he has done a good job so far. - User:Whitehouse 14:36, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 15:28, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Eh - a little bit country, a little bit punk. --xoxo 15:35, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• vouch Its been 6 months already? Asheets 18:46, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - As long as he wants to continue I say let him. --Roorgh 18:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - Level headed, knows the job well. --Haliman - Talk 19:32, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - In my time back from hiatus, all I've seen him do is good. He's also very friendly, if not a little random. I would recommend that he stays on as a sysop and a bureaucrat. --User:Axe27/Sig 19:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - Because.--SirArgo ^Talk 21:01, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch a good Sysop who was promoted to Crat a little soon. Still, done and doing a good job so far so i have no qualms about vouching him to keep on going. --Honestmistake 22:34, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - BALLS OF STEEL. --Paddy Dignam^{IS DEAD} 23:26, 30 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch - SA's unexplained vote on a contentious Misconduct case leaves me with questions. Care to elaborate?--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 23:46, 30 July 2009 (BST)

  Whenever I leave a vote blank, it's because either my vote itself explains how I feel (a la Suggestions) or I feel no need to make an input because another person has made my points somewhere else. I've never had much trouble with that game plan on any other page than suggestions, but if everyone feels it's a problem (I hope not. More work for me. :/) then I suppose I could always add a short little describer even if my point has been made already.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 00:24, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  You fail to see the importance of committing to an opinion. Vouch, because you're honest and fair. -10 points until you grow some balls.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 00:44, 31 July 2009 (BST)

• Man, I'm so biased, but he's really got good intentions, and such. Yeah. Bit of a mudkip sympathizer, though. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 00:29, 31 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch --  RoosterDragon  01:19, 31 July 2009 (BST)
• Against--Thadeous Oakley 09:32, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  Lol bias. =p -- Cheese 10:16, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  Whatever.--Thadeous Oakley 10:35, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  What's got you so down today? --Cyberbob 11:10, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  I respect it. Unlike Giles, he had the decency to go against, rather than persistently complain and then vouch. --ϑϑℜ 14:00, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  I'm not talking about the Against vote per se. He just seems a bit sourer than his usual self. Cyberbob  Talk  14:35, 31 July 2009 (BST)

  Is that the best bait you have on that oversized fishing hook?--Thadeous Oakley 00:10, 1 August 2009 (BST)

  Yeah and you know what he's probably compensating for something with that thing. --xoxo 01:26, 1 August 2009 (BST)

• Vouch - Meh, spose so. =p He hasn't broken anything important yet. -- Cheese 10:16, 31 July 2009 (BST)
• Vouch --Orange Talk 14:32, 31 July 2009 (BST)
• Abstain --WanYao 23:23, 31 July 2009 (BST)
• Against One of the subjects of my template--DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 00:14, 1 August 2009 (BST)

Recently Concluded Bids

For more concluded bids, see Category:Promotions Candidacies.

Archived Promotions

• Complete list of Promotion Requests
• Successful Promotions Candidacies
• Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies
• Unaccepted Nominations
• Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies