User talk:Misanthropy
2010: Q1 • Q2 • Q3 • Q4 2011: Q1 • Q2 • Q3 • Q4 |
- Please post new comments at the bottom, using the highest-level header (=header name=). You might see a little "+" buttom up at the top there, if you're using an older browser. Don't click it. Just don't fucking do it.
- I'll reply on your talk page if you contact me here.
- Cheers.
- For any users posting a sixth (or, indeed, seventh or beyond) topic on this page, full permission is granted to move the oldest topic in its entirety to the relevant archive.
- Not that any of you will ever do it, but it's worth disclaimer-ing it to avoid unnecessary A/VB shitepipery.
Favor to Ask
Now that your dead... bite my ass! -∞ Poodle of Doom ∞ 03:29, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- Check the talk page of that image, Poodle. You actually helped him. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:30, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- If you're after an infection, I'm all pooped out for now, but sit tight and you can have one in the morning. 03:31, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- *you're -- LEMON #1 05:27, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- That's what I said. You are. You're. 16:05, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- He was talking to poodle who got it wrong.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature3 16:09, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- Oh that's so common it's not even worth pointing out. 16:10, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- Let's not even go in to how he spelt "Favour". ;) --User:Yonnua Koponen/signature3 16:11, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- Oh that's so common it's not even worth pointing out. 16:10, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- He was talking to poodle who got it wrong.--User:Yonnua Koponen/signature3 16:09, 29 October 2010 (BST)
- That's what I said. You are. You're. 16:05, 29 October 2010 (BST)
barbara
who knocked that shit open? omg! -- LEMON #1 01:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I like
I likey alot-- Skoll Die 01:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Sig
Hey Mis, much as I like your bold and colourful sig, doesn't it read MISANROPY? Where's the TH?--Mallrat TSI TKS CTD 19:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Fight Factory
I figured you might want in. Give me some time to get it together. Think Fight Club, just much badassier. ~ 22:00, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- I had been thinking that already. No shirts, no shoes, no weapons, no leaving, no healing, no anything-that-isn't-punching? 22:10, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, we'll have our own rules. My idea is a Fight Club group. Not pro survivor, not pro-zombie, no PKer. We participate in manhunts and fight one another in the interim. Hold our own mini-manhunts, hone skills, challenge others to fights, etc. ~ 22:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Cool I'll see what I can do. Comms might be IRC at first. ~ 01:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm on ur talk page
Clikin ur magik plus sign. ~ 01:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Abnoxious images
Case Precedent - Obnoxious images on admin pages that don't serve the discussion at all have never been allowed. 300px is more than ample enough, and it doesn't cause a massive image to be in the middle of everybody's page, derailing the discussion. I'm going to revert.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also, I'm in no way "editting your comments" - that's just utter bullshit.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Explain how it is bullshit please. Content added in a discussion section by one user should not be edited by another user simply because they don't like it. 15:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also I remember your shitty precedent, that image stretched the page horizontally. Mine doesn't. It's not page breaking in any way, so don't touch it again. 15:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, I did.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, somebody's comments should not be editted. My edit in no way changed the meaning of your comment, it just stopped it taking up the entire screen. And it isn't "Simply because I don't like it", it's because it's massively obnoxious and distracts from conversation on an admin page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- It was deliberately made at that size so as to not take up the full screen, so don't try that lie on me. You're simply being a fucking asshole over something so trivial as a genuinely harmless image added as part of a comment. 15:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- It's taking up most of my monitor, so fuck off. No image should be that big on an admin page. 300px is even pushing it. This isn't your personal playground, the admin pages are a place for serious administrative business. I'm going to keep reverting and I'd wager you are too. Arbies?--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 15:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- It was deliberately made at that size so as to not take up the full screen, so don't try that lie on me. You're simply being a fucking asshole over something so trivial as a genuinely harmless image added as part of a comment. 15:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also I remember your shitty precedent, that image stretched the page horizontally. Mine doesn't. It's not page breaking in any way, so don't touch it again. 15:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Explain how it is bullshit please. Content added in a discussion section by one user should not be edited by another user simply because they don't like it. 15:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)