Suggestion:20090806 Leftover Medical Supplies

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search


Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20090806 Leftover Medical Supplies

BlueSpurt 02:27, 6 August 2009 (BST)

Suggestion type
Item

Suggestion scope
Survivors

Suggestion description
Whilst searching hospitals or infirmaries, survivors have a small chance to find "medical scraps". The item could also be named "medical supplies", "leftover medical supplies", "medical clutter", "medical junk" - anything like that, really. Anyway, the chance to find one instance of this item is slightly higher than the chance to find a first-aid kit. When the player has 3 or 4 (one of those numbers is randomly selected) "medical scraps", a message appears on screen:

Using your found medical clutter, you just about manage to pull together a first-aid kit.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes


Kill Votes

  1. Kill - So if you were to find these as often as FAK's...and 3 or 4 were equal to a FAK...this means you want to boost FAK search rates by 25-33%? No. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 02:36, 6 August 2009 (BST)
    RE: - The point is you have to find them individually. It's very unlikely you're going to find these in quick succession. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlueSpurt (talkcontribs) 02:43, 6 August 2009.
    RE: - So? That doesn't affect the numbers. -- User:The Rooster RoosterDragon User talk:The Rooster 03:16, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  2. Kill - Totally unneeded, FAKs are easy enough to find.--SirArgo Talk 03:08, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  3. Kill - It's not a bad concept, but you just need to tweak a few more parts, for example, the encumberance of these scraps. Maybe you should be able to choose to save how long you want before you can merge all the supplies? This had a lot that could be desired. Should have gone to DS. --ϑϑ 03:32, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  4. Kill - As roosty--Orange Talk 03:36, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  5. So I'm still finding FAKs at the same rate, but as an added bonus I'm getting these "pieces" that add up so that once in a while I get a free FAK. This is a freebie which is not needed. - User:Whitehouse 03:49, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  6. Kill - Inane FAK search boost. Not needed. --User:Axe27/Sig 04:13, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  7. Kill - As above. --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 04:36, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  8. kill - Its good that your thinking out of the box but this idea isnt too awesome --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 05:36, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  9. Kill - As ^... great thoughts, but not needed in regard to FAKs. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 08:02, 6 August 2009 (BST)
  10. Kill - Nice attempt at adding realism but I could see it as an additional annoyance. - Zig13 - 6/08/2009 at 10:50(BST)
  11. Kill - I just don't see the point. User:Armpit_Odor/sig 00:37, 7 August 2009 (BST)
  12. Kill/Archive - Isn't needed right now, however it could be used to nerf FAK search rates later on. --Blake Firedancer T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T. 05:29, 7 August 2009 (BST)
  13. Kill - As DDR.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 19:13, 8 August 2009 (BST)
  14. Kill -14 kill votes are enough to make you think twice on a Suggestion...not like the idea--(x)AlvaromesaTalk | Bacardi |MPD | Malton Public Radio 21:17, 8 August 2009 (BST)
  15. Kill - I'm pretty sure this is how it is supposed to work anyway.--Uberursa 19:05, 10 August 2009 (BST)
  16. Kill - Why?--The General T Sys U! P! F! 15:19, 12 August 2009 (BST)
  17. Kill - As above --Chekken 04:14, 14 August 2009 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. So we dilute FAK search odds for items that wastes inventory space until eventually yielding another FAK, which is what we were searching for in the first place. News flash: search rates are already subject to some amount of fluctuation. What the hell were you trying to achieve? Next time, please take your half-baked idea to Developing Suggestions before posting it here. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 05:35, 7 August 2009 (BST)
    Next time you post ask yourself if what your posting will make you sound like a dick--DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 07:57, 7 August 2009 (BST) Non-author Re struck. --Bob Boberton TF / DW Littlemudkipsig.gif 08:09, 7 August 2009 (BST)
  2. Spam - This suggestion is ridiculous, useless, and game-breaking; as pretty much everyone on the page. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 23:07, 10 August 2009 (BST)
  3. Spam - As Revenant. I'm bothering in part because he made such excellent points, in part because of the non-author re. --Visible One 01:27, 11 August 2009 (BST)



Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20090806 Leftover Medical Supplies). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)