UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(635 intermediate revisions by 56 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/A]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{| align="right"
{| align="right"
|__TOC__
|__TOC__
Line 7: Line 7:


=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
=Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration=
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
{{ArbitrationNotice}}
<!--
<!--


If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
-->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
===[[User:Misanthropy]] vs [[User:Axe Hack]]===
I demand that Axe Hack put a link to my user page in his sig. I have no leverage and I have maybe been drinking. I will accept only users with obvious bias as arbitrators. I will offer remunerations in mudkipz, and quite possibly will create several hundred unnecessary user subpages if I can be bothered. I don't really know why I'm doing this. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:51, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:Not unless you put a link to my Userpage in your sig.  And I demand there be a jury of 12 biased Arbitrators. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:54, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::Deal. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:57, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:::Wait, was that a deal to part one or part 2?  Because I wasn't serious about part 1. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:00, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::::Damn to arbitration we go then. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:02, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:::::I still demand a trail by a jury of 12 Arbitrators, though. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 03:04, 28 June 2010 (BST)
I offer to arby.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 03:32, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:How biased are you? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:57, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::I'm so biased... I'd describe myself as being predisposed. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:09, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:::Hm...I think he could be the foreman of the jury.  That works for me. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:33, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::::Gee... didn't think I'd actually get it. ''If'' you can find 11 other people now. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 17:39, 28 June 2010 (BST)
Volunteer to arby. I'm a sysop, so naturally I'm biased and intend to breed corruption wherever I go.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:45, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:Exactly how biased? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:48, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::So biased that the wiki software cannot express hwo biased I am.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 17:49, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:::If Mis agrees with you, we'll just need 10 more Arbitrators. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 17:50, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::::Yarp. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:51, 28 June 2010 (BST)
Massively biased. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:58, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:You're perfect.  If Mis agrees, we just need 9 more Arbitrators... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 19:07, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::Yep. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:13, 28 June 2010 (BST)
Just remember... I'm the foreman of the jury dammit! I can do what I want.... -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 19:52, 28 June 2010 (BST)
I'm so biased I already know who I'm siding against... --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 23:07, 28 June 2010 (BST)
:You're hired if Mis agrees.  8 more to go... --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 23:46, 28 June 2010 (BST)
::DO IT. Do it in huggies. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:20, 29 June 2010 (BST)
I'm so biased I'm worth the bias of 12 people.--[[User:Jorm|jorm]] 01:28, 29 June 2010 (BST)
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
=Arbitration Cases in Progress=
<!--
<!--
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
If there is no arbitration cases under consideration, please add the following text to this header
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
 
''There are currently no cases under consideration''
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Yonnua Koponen vs Jorm|Yonnua Koponen vs Jorm]]===
 
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Yonnua Koponen|Yonnua]] vs [[User:Jorm|Jorm]]|arbitrator=[[User:Misanthropy|Misanthropy]]|created_at=19:39, 4 June 2010 (BST)|created_by=[[User:Yonnua Koponen|Yonnua]]|status=Ongoing|summary=Attempt to end edit war on Mayor of Malton page}}


=Recently Concluded cases=
=Recently Concluded cases=
 
<!--
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cornholioo vs DanceDanceRevolution|Cornholioo vs DanceDanceRevolution]]===
If there are no recently concluded cases, please add the following text to this header
 
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]] vs [[User:DanceDanceRevolution|DanceDanceRevolution]]|arbitrator=none|created_at=14:30, 7 May 2010 (BST)|created_by=[[User:Cornholioo|Cornholioo]]|status=archived|summary=Cornholioo wanted DDR off his talk page because of his swearing.}}
-->
 
''There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the [[:Category:Arbitration Cases|archives]] for older cases.''
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/DanceDanceRevolution vs Boxy|DanceDanceRevolution vs Boxy]]===
 
{{ArbitrationStatus|users=[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|DanceDanceRevolution]] vs [[User:Boxy|Boxy]]|arbitrator=none|created_at=12:37, 7 June 2010(BST)|created_by=[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|DanceDanceRevolution]]|status=withdrawn|summary=Argument over status of comments on main A/VB page}}
 
 


=Archives=
=Archives=
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]
*[[:Category:Arbitration Cases|List of Arbitration Cases]]

Latest revision as of 15:11, 7 January 2015

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.

Guidelines for Arbitration Requests

In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.

Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:

  • The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
  • The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
  • Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.

Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.

As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.

After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.

Current Arbitrators

For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.

The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}

Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.

Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order

Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration

Administration Notice
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.


Arbitration Cases in Progress

There are currently no cases under consideration

Recently Concluded cases

There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.

Archives