UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Deletion Scheduling: I don't believe there is a minimum required participation.)
 
(301 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|[[A/D/S]]}}
{{Shortcut|[[A/D/S]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


Line 14: Line 14:
Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)
Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)


After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the request fails to get the required number of votes, it doesn't get added. In either case, the closed request can then get shifted to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|Archive]].
After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the vote fails, it will be cycled as unsuccessful. The closed request can then get shifted to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|Archive]].


==Scheduling requests under consideration==
==Scheduling requests under consideration==
<!--''There are currently no requests under consideration.''-->
<!--''There are currently no requests under consideration.''-->
===Grouped Location Pages===
''There are currently no requests under consideration.''
Grouped location pages, such as [[Shackleville Schools]], are to be deleted once they have been de-merged and incoming links (excluding those referencing deletion) have been diverted to the appropriate pages.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
==Recent Requests==
 
<!--''There are currently no recently served requests.'' -->
===Unnecessary banned user pages===
''There are currently no recently served requests.''
The User: pages of permbanned spambot and dedicated vandal alt accounts that have no contributions showing (due to history wipe or spam/vandalism deletion) and no links to the page except from [[A/VB]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots|A/VB/B]] (or their talk pages) should be deleted <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 01:13 13 November 2009 (BST)</small>
 
#'''Yes''' <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 01:13 13 November 2009 (BST)</small>
#I didn't actually read it but I thought it would be a good idea to just '''sheep whatever boxy picked AKA YES YOU COCKS'''.--[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 01:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yes''' {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yes'''--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 01:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yea''' - Just add it to the spambot clause that's already on the Scheduled page, imo. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|red|black}}-- 02:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yes''' - '''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 04:28, 13 November 2009 (BST)
#'''Yea''' --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>
#'''No''' - A facetious attempt to add moderation to the process, [[UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Banning/Archive/2009_11#User:Malikronthedouche|yesterday's entertainment]] isn't a spambot nor can check user find an current account here so it's not a 'an alt' either, do you think Boxy will try to delete it under this criteria? How about [[User:God]]? You going to delete that as a vandal alt of [[User:Amazing]]? It fits your poorly written criteria. {{[[Template|BannedUser]]}} exists purely to be placed on the pages of banned users without pages. Deleting a page takes precisely the same amount of effort as protecting it, the difference? No-one's been escalated for adding banned user to vandal pages, people have been escalated for adding {{[[WelcomeNewbie]]}} to banned vandal pages. Is Boxy going to alter his criteria to grant immunity to anyone doing mass welcomes? Didn't think so. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 09:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#:I did have some concerns about the inclusion of regular vandal alts as well as bots in this, but it wouldn't cover ones that make "normal" comments on people's talk pages (to gloat or whatever) and they're the only ones that people would ever visit anyway. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 12:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#:Oh, look. Your example doesn't [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/User:God&limit=100&from=0 qualify]. And look up the useage of {{tl|tl}} <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:59 13 November 2009 (BST)</small>
#::So all you want is it to link to another page? I feel a subpage coming on. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 15:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yea''' - Why should spambits be immortalized with their own pages?  Also, if this change is implemented, there should be a vandalism exemption for adding [[:Template:WelcomeNewbie|<nowiki>{{</nowiki>WelcomeNewbie<nowiki>}}</nowiki>]] to the banned users.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#:No there shouldn't. Welcomenewbie is a stupid template that only exists so that people can pad their edit counts. Anything that would make life a little bit harder for the mindless <code>==Welcome==<br /><nowiki>{{welcomenewbie}} ~~~~</nowiki></code> drones is A-OK in my book. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#:Ummm, this scheduled deletion doesn't mean that creating the pages is automatic vandalism, only that a sysop can nuke them on sight. Inadvertently putting {{tl|WN}} on a spambot/vandal's talk page will not be vandalism <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 13:25 13 November 2009 (BST)</small>
#::Ah good.  Then what are you talking about people getting escalated, Iscariot?--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 13:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#:::I think he means how some users purposefully put the template on multiple banned users pages. Not sure though. He'll probably along any minute to yell at me and say he can argue his own things though. :C --[[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> SA</span>]] 15:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#::::Users were escalated incorrectly for adding the welcome newbie template to red linked user talk pages. As this deletion holds no such exemption I'm thinking that it shouldn't go through until good faith users are protected against the warping of A/VB by certain people. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 15:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yep''' I agree. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 15:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''Aye''' - gotta leave nothing for those silly bots --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 20:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
#'''YES''' - I was just about to do this myself. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


==Recent Requests==
''For older cases, please see the [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive|archive]].''
===[[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive#Defunct Group Images|Defunct Group Images]]===
'''Failed''' with 3 for and 11 against. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 00:27, 18 October 2009 (BST)


===[[UDWiki:Administration/Deletions/Scheduling/Archive#Unused images|Unused images]]===
== [[UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule|Scheduled Deletions]] ==
'''Failed''' with 1 for and 17 against. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:36, 15 October 2009 (BST)


{{UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule}}
{{UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule}}

Latest revision as of 04:40, 17 September 2018

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page will be used for users to request that pages falling into certain categories be deleted as appropriate by a sysop without having to go through all the red tape of Speedy Deletions and Deletions. A list of pages in the Scheduled Deletions list is located here.

Deletion Scheduling

Deletion Scheduling requests should be requested in the same general format as normal Deletions. Votes will occur in the same general manner, and like normal deletion requests will be voted on for two (2) weeks, as judged by the initial datestamp. Votes in this case shall be as follows:

  • Yea - For approval of the deletion scheduling request
  • Nay - For disapproval of the deletion scheduling request

Remember that votes must be signed and datestamped (use ~~~~)

After the two weeks are up, if the page has reached at least a 50% majority in favour it is added to the Scheduled list. If the vote fails, it will be cycled as unsuccessful. The closed request can then get shifted to the Archive.

Scheduling requests under consideration

There are currently no requests under consideration.

Recent Requests

There are currently no recently served requests.

For older cases, please see the archive.

Scheduled Deletions

Image revision removal
Image revisions that are older than 7 days are to be removed.
Approved 16 May 2006
Monumental Screw Ups
Pages in this form: with//////lots//////of//////slashes, and this one: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Example_monumental_screwup are unable to be moved or edited via normal means. Their content is to be manually moved to a sensible pagename without extraneous //s in its title and the original page is to be deleted on sight.
Note to sysops: A method for deleting these pages can be found here.
Approved 23 August 2006
Unused redirects resulting from page moves
redirects resulting from moves, that only show admin pages in their "what links here" list.
Approved 3 Mar 2007
Copyrighted images
Images that are requested to be deleted by the copyright holder
Approved 10 Nov 2007
Broken redirects
redirects that lead to nonexistent pages
Approved 12 Dec 2007
Personal Information
If a user wants personal information about themselves deleted from the wiki, they should be able to get it speedy deleted. Things like your name, your phone number, your email or home address, your workplace, pictures of your family etc. Link
Approved 11 July 2008
Porn is to be deleted on sight.
I like porn, you like porn, but this isnt the place for it.
Approved 22 July 2008
Revoked 2 August 2009
User page redirects
in the main space should be delete on sight as crit 3 or 9 (excluding those redirecting to Kevan).
Approved 26 November 2008
Swearing in page titles
Pages that have swearing in the title that is directed at a user or group (or their actions).
Approved 22 July 2008
Crit 7 by Proxy
If a user leaves a sysop a note on their (i.e the sysop's) talk page requesting deletion of a page that falls under Crit 7, the Sysop may delete the page on sight, making clear in the edit summary that the user requested it via talk page.
Approved 26 March 2009
As of January 2010, this scheduling now includes pages that the author has blanked or replaced with text indicating a desire to be deleted. However, pages used as inclusions (such as many templates) are excluded from this criterion.
Approved 3 January 2010
Crit 11
Userpages/Journals that are in the User: namespace but are non-existent users, and are already duplicated in the appropriate User: or Journal: subspace may be deleted on sight.
Approved 30 June 2009
Adbot-created pages
Pages created by Adbots and Spambots are to be deleted on sight.
Approved 30 July 2009
Unnecessary banned user pages
The User: pages of permabanned spambots and vandal alts (that have no contributions showing) are to be deleted on sight.
Approved 27 November 2009
Grouped location pages
Grouped location pages are to be deleted once each individual location has its own page and all incoming links (excluding those refrencing deletion) are diverted.
Approved 1 December 2009
Unused Image Removal
Images on the Unused Image list that are two weeks old are to be deleted. Images that are linked by text only will appear on the unused image list also.
Approved 10 December 2009
Associated talk pages
Talk pages associated with pages that are deleted under other policies, including talk pages missed in previous deletions.
Approved 19th May 2010
Amended 14th August 2011
Crit 9
Personal Page (Prefix Rule): The page is named after a user without the "User:" or "Journal:" prefixes and its content has been moved to the appropriate User or Journal page. Includes pages that should be User subpages, ie. in-game characters.
Approved 29th August 2011