UDWiki:Administration/Demotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(632 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{shortcut|[[A/DM]]}}
{{Moderationnav}}
{{Administrationnav}}
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


Line 8: Line 8:
===Request===
===Request===
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through promotions page again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Reason for demotion''' - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
*'''Effects of demotion''' - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|their term]].


After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]].
After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|archive]].


===Inactivity===
===Inactivity===
Line 22: Line 23:
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.
*If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.


==Requests for demotion still needing to be processed==
==Demotions in process==
<!--
''There are no active demotions.''
-->
===[[User:Rosslessness]]===
{{bid|Rosslessness}}


4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
:Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
::I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the [[Wikipedia:Ship of Theseus|Ship of Theseus]], a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


==Recent Actions==
==Recent Actions==
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Demotions/Archive|archive]]''.
<!--
''There are no recent actions''
-->
''There are no recent actions''


=== [[User:Suicidalangel]] ===


Thankfully those faggots over in Red Rum couldn't get their shit together to try and meat-puppet me into 'crat, so I ain't gotta worry about that. I want to be a regular user again, and that way I can leave at anytime without feeling guilt. Also, this way leaves no reason for anyone to call me back when I do eventually leave.
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS MESSAGE -->
 
''Older actions can be found in the [[UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives|Sysop Archives]] and the [[:Category:Demotions_Archives|relevant category]].''
inb4thad. ;) --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 21:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
:No SA! You better give me my money! --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 21:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
:: :O Nooo --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 21:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
::No, and before anyone asks, yes, I'm sure I want demoted.--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 21:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
:Noooes! If I spam your talkpage up, will you take me to arbitration and stay longer? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:12, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
::JESUS FUCKING CHRIST IS EVERYONE GOING TO MISINTERPRET THAT FUCKING PART? I AM NOT LEAVING YET, I GOT SHIT TO DO. Someday, yes, just like most users do (except box and cb, addicted freaks they be!), just not in the next few months. Hot damn. :/ --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 22:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
:::We just like annoying you.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Demote the cunt ;)--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 22:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
:Indeed :D --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 
Dammit, SA, I was all ready to vouch you on your next re-evaluation. You can't leave yet! Your work isn't finished!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature‎}} 22:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 
Are you sure<!--- that you want to become active and start contributing again?--->?{{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 01:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
You sure, SA? Like, absolutely positively? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:Positive, you of all people should know that.--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 08:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
fuck you SA >:( {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:Yes, fuck me. :( --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 08:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
Processed then. Thanks for the help over the past year bud. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:No problem. Maybe now I can get more done without having to deal with making semi-unbiased decisions about shit! :D --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 08:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
::Yeah, thanks for your help, and have fun now :D <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup></span> 09:08 2 January 2010 (BST)</small>
 
But, but, why? Demotions are my thing! --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:Because it was needed.--[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 11:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
 
I made a drunken oopsie...
 
Er, whats the precedence for an op who ask to be demoted in a fit of drunken hilarity to be given back his powers, and maybe a punishment for his stupidity?? God damn it 73. >< --[[¯\(°_o)/¯|<span style="color: DarkMagenta"> ¯\(°_o)/</span>]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkTurquoise">¯</span>]] 23:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
:It's been five months since you're last re-promotion. You could just run again on A/PM. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 23:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
'''Vouch''' Meets all the basic criteria. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 23:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}}
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Check|Sysop Activity Check}}

Latest revision as of 23:17, 1 December 2022

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for system operators to request a demotion of status, or for enaction of demotion due to long-term inactivity. The act of demotion is restricted to those with bureaucrat status, and as such system operators will need to request their demotion here.

Guidelines for Demotion Requests

Request

System operators who wish to request demotion must consider these things before applying.

  • Reason for demotion - As demotions cannot be reversed unless the user goes through the promotion process again, the user is asked to make sure that they are making the correct decision when applying for demotion.
  • Effects of demotion - Demotions may necessitate additional action, such as in the case of a Bureaucrat being demoted, which triggers an immediate by-election to fill their seat for the remainder of their term.

After a system operator has submitted his or her demotion request, the active Bureaucrats will review it, and after reaching a unanimous decision, choose to either demote the system operator or deny his or her request. After action has been taken, the request will be moved to the archive.

Inactivity

Crystal Clear app xmag.png main article: Policy Text

  • A sysop that hasn't made any edit in four months will be warned, on their talk page, by a Bureaucrat, that they face demotion of their sysop powers in one week, if they remain inactive.
  • One week after the warning has been placed, dependant on the actions of the sysop, the Bureaucrat will decide whether or not to carry out the demotion.
  • This is to avoid, for example, the unlikely case of a sysop simply making a single edit with the aim of avoiding the demotion.
  • The Bureaucrat is trusted and bound to make a fair decision, and not to demote a sysop who clearly demonstrates a return to activity on the wiki.
  • Any demonstrable abuse of this power by a Bureaucrat, however unlikely, could (as with any other abuse of specific powers) be grounds for a Misconduct case.
  • If the sysop makes no response at all to the warnings, they must be demoted.

Demotions in process

User:Rosslessness

4+ month inactivity, have made a note on his talk page. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Ross has responded, I'm not interested in demoting him and I doubt AHLG is either, but will leave here just in case Gnome has grown into Goblin. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 22:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
I mean by this point I'm not sure that Ross is even really Ross. Like the Ship of Theseus, a little bit of him changes each day, and we don't see any of it because he's not around. So he's not Ross. Call him by a new name. I'll call him, how about, Jross. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 23:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Recent Actions

There are no recent actions


Older actions can be found in the Sysop Archives and the relevant category.


Sysop Activity Check

User Position Last Contribution Seat Available
A Helpful Little Gnome (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-29 2021-12-01
DanceDanceRevolution (Contribs) Bureaucrat 2021-10-28 2021-12-01
Rosslessness (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-14 N/A
Stelar (Contribs) Sysop 2021-10-29 N/A

Total Sysops: 4 (excluding Kevan, LeakyBocks and Urbandead)

Last updated at: 03:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)