UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The General vs Terminator 484

Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.

The General v. Terminator 484

His user page is almost double the width of a normal page. It also defaces the page horribly for anyone who doesn't have a widescreen moniter.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 08:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd be willing to arbitrate. Cyberbob  Talk  09:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, normally i'd reject you. But I think this time i'll give you a go, and I have a feeling that you hate Terminator just as much as you hate me :P.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 09:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Gah. I wonder how he'll react, seeing that comment? I'm an unbiased arbitrator - whether or not I like Terminator will not come into my decisionmaking process. Cyberbob  Talk  09:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

the General said "Actually, i've changed my mind, you're rejected.", but I've moved the subsequent "discussion" to the talk page -- boxy ^{T L PA DA} 02:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd take this one. I'm unbiased in that I don't know either of you guys, and I think I could rule fairly. --Dickhole Bonaparte _{Leader, Malton Rangers} 20:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I don't know you, but I suppose i'll accept you. Though I find the fact that you don't know me rather insulting.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 20:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I know of you, but I don't know you personally. --Dickhole Bonaparte _{Leader, Malton Rangers} 21:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

You might want to put something informing him of this case on his talk page. He has a "less active" template on his page that dates to today, so the chances of him just accidentally seeing this seem slim. -- ∀lan Watson ^T·RVP 23:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I will, but he'll probably just delete it or make an "attempted" insult directed at me.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 23:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I'll post on his page--Dickhole Bonaparte _{Leader, Malton Rangers} 01:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

If we ever get terminator on. Is there a rule for this gage?--Dickhole Bonaparte _{Leader, Malton Rangers} 00:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

It is not required for both parties to be present in the preceedings. If he has not replied soon, shall we continue without him?--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 00:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

*Gage Sighs

I could arbitrate this one as well I guess.--Gage 06:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I've already accepted dickhole guy, but I don't mind you doing it.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 20:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm kinda sure that Terminator wouldn't accept Gage. Just a guess.. --Niilomaan ^GRR!•M! 13:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Fer cris sake General, go do something more productive than complain about A USER PAGE. Its his user page, and he can do whatever he wants with it (with some restrictions, but this doesnt fall in none of them)... If any arbitrator give reason to General and Terminator484's page is changed, then this is the absolute proof that the arb system is completly flawed. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 15:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok, i'll start a two week voting process inhibiting this sort of thing? Anyway, there's plenty of precendent for this sort of case.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 15:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

You want to make a policy forbidding this ? Great! this wiki doesnt have enough stupid policies, right... we could always have one more. And no, there is no precedent for this, since he is not being offensive to no one (directly). He is a jackas, yes. Must he change his page ? Heck no. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 15:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, what do you call the arbitration forbidding page-outside-text area exploits? And then the policy against it. Just because this isn't involving Amazing doesn't change the facts.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 15:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

It is inside the text-area.... if your screen is wide enough to fit it. And why do you had to cite amazing on it ? --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 15:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Didn't you get the memo? General's a member of Amazing's secret "club", if you know what I mean. Cyberbob  Talk  06:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

OK, should we archive this ? Its been more than a week and none of the involved parties have shown interest on it after the short discussion above.--People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

We can start without trenchinator.--Thari ^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 01:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

My concern is that general no longer is interessted in this.. so there would be no case, which i would praise him for recognizing that... --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I am still interested in it. It is just that there is nothing for me to add. I don't see the point in bloating the page for no good reason.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 04:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

If you dont see the pointless of this arbitration, then you are a very sad sad person general. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 16:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC) (pointless, lack of point, whatever... i am drunk and going to celebrate new years eve... )

Nah, I just don't like people breaking wiki pages.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 05:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Archive? I say just delete it! Its totaly pointless and if anything Terminator could file a complaint for harasment... This is bullying, nothing more and nothing less! I think even the general knows that which is why he is letting it go. --Honestmistake 01:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Its more than 3 weeks since this arbitration has been started, and even an arby wasnt choosen. Please, solve this case or archive it. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 18:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

We're waiting for termie, there's nothing I can do. The only thing I can think of is to start the arbitration without him.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 07:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

That could be worked out, since its covered in the arb rules. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 14:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Not solved in 4 weeks. Archieved as undecided arbitration case. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Moved back. Not my fault he hasn't responded. I'm quite happy to have it resolved without him.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 21:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

If we can start, I guess I've been accepted, lets just get this resolved--General Lee A. Dickhole _{Malton Rangers} 03:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Not solved in 4 weeks. Archieved as undecided arbitration case according to another arbitration ruling. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 02:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

---