User:Che13/Sandbox

You have new messages (last change).

Che13

well, i'm new, so i think a sandbox is a good idea, to prevent ruining other peoples pages--Che13 02:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

testing my sig--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 02:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC) more sig testing--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 04:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

	Here, have a rat!
	someone has given a dude a rat for something.

{{FreeRat|someone|a dude|something.}}

blinking text. {{blink|blinking text.}}

big text. <font size=12>big text. </font>

REDIRECTS: #REDIRECT [[]]

Showcode: <nowiki></nowiki>

Fake heading: <font size=4></font>

Colors:red {{c|red|}}, orange {{c|orange|}}, yellow {{c|yellow|}}, green {{c|LimeGreen|}}, blue {{c|DodgerBlue|}}, Indigo {{c|Navy|}}, Violet {{c|Indigo|Violet}}

code or quote box<code></code>

Link to specific bits on pages: [[page#heading|title]] = [[#|]]

You are inside here. decorate the walls. The building has been extremely heavily barricaded. A has been set up here. It is running. Somebody has spraypainted something onto a wall.

Since your last turn:

• someone killed a zombie (4 seconds ago)
• a dude healed you for 10 HP (0 seconds ago)

---

Proposed page for the evac plans

Read first

This is For Ghetto Cow members only, if you are not one leave now, or face the fury of our Rats and probably a Feral Squid not to mention a Robot and a Male stripper

Fallback points strategy

• A part of us should always be 1 step ahead of the others, if we are holding the current location, those members should be at the primary fallback point to do some scouting (check danger and cades level, change the strategy if it's necesary) and getting ready some of that beutifull glittering serum for the fallem. If we have to move to the primary fallback point then the scouts should move to the secondary ASAP. Current scouts are:
• If the nearest NecroTech Building falls, soon after the mall will fall (usually 24 to 48 hours, sometimes even in the same day). Primary fallback points usually falls 24 to 72 hours later than the mall becouse the Zombies spread into smaller groups and atack every building in their way.
• If it's clear that the primary fallback point will fall soon (for example same amount of zeds and survivors in it) just cade, heal and move to the secondary rendevouz point, especially if you can revive others.

Current location

Defending Treweeke Mall in Dulston. Particulary The Whitlock Building at 92,5

please check the Dulston barricade plan

Primary revive point at Bruorton Drive 92,6 as the Heddington Walk Railway Station serves as an entry point both to the mall and the NT building

Rendevouz points

• Primary: Due to the location of Dulston chosing fallback points either to the north or the east would get us trapped in the worst case escenario situation so the first fallback point in case of The Whitlock Building falling into Zombie hands is The Starr Building in Rhodenbank. Entry point at Gable Walk Fire Station 89,5

• AP: 3 to the entry point 5 to the building

• Revivification point: The Cabble Monument 88,6

• Secundary: The Devonshire Building 83,5 in Rhodenbank. Entry point at Billinghurst Place Police Department

• AP: 5 to the entry point 8 to the building

• Revivification point: wasteland at 83,4

---

	Administration Services – Deletion
	This page, User:Che13/Sandbox, is currently being voted on for deletion on the deletions page. Please visit that page for more details, or to vote regarding the deletion of this page.

Note: I'm asking myself for this page to be deleted, since I think it's creating too much Wikidrama. My idea behind the suggestion was simply to give more "tools" for RP, and the discussion is turning into a nightmare of political correctness versus incorrectness, English geography, and personal religious belives. Aparrently I totally understimated the controversy religion can produce on the wiki, and it's getting totally out of hand. I didn't think I would get people so fired up, and it wasn't my intention--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 08:04, 9 June 2007 (BST)

20070608 Malton's religion diversity

♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 10:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Suggestion type
Building change.

Suggestion scope
some churches, survivors and zombies from other religions.

Suggestion description
I suggested that in churches you could find Religion related necklaces, like Rosary beads. (small necklace crucifixs) and medals of the saint the building is named after. Two users (Lucky 1uke and Queen Mum) asked for other religions to be included too, and that made me think malton is in need of at least some of the major religious groups representation. Simply put at least some churches should be changed (only in the name and description) to the folowwing: a mosque, a sinagogue, a buddist temple and a hinduism temple. Malton is too big to lack those, and it would add a lot of flavour and rol playing posibilities. I dont suggest the churches that should be changed, becouse I think kevan should pick them.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Keep - Author vote--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 10:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. Keep I think this is a briliant Idea. Adds flavour and interest. C'mon guys, let's not be all boring about it.--Seventythree 14:36, 8 June 2007 (BST)
3. Keep - Karek, Kevan is quite supportive for map changes. reread it and look here and second Malton is the size of a metropole with hundreds of churches and 5 cathedrals. With about 5% to 10% of the religious population being non-christian finding some religious buildings of other faiths is almost certain. It would be fun to include simply for flavor.-- Vista  +1  14:50, 8 June 2007 (BST)
4. Keep - Imagine the role-playing possibilities: an anti-semetic Zed... --Charley C. 17:31, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Or a zed trying to eat only kosher survivors...-- Vista  +1  18:29, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - The same as armareum, but just in Kill form. Leave religius conflicts out of game... --Duke Garland_T^{LCD SSZ} 10:16, 8 June 2007 (BST)
2. Kill - What does this have to do with anything? The buildings are in place now and in any well sized american or british town the likelyness of finding a noncatholic/christian church is extremely low. Just assume Malton either didn't have any or the portion of malton closed off didn't have any. Problem solved.--karek 10:27, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Moved discussion to the talkpage due to size issues.-- Vista  +1  18:29, 8 June 2007 (BST)

3. Kill - Pointless Flavor. --Saluton 14:51, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - can you say oximoron? If it adds flavour, it's not pointless--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   I'm going to step in and be pedantic here. Can you spell oxymoron. And actually looking at the article, an oxymoron is rather a compliment - since it has inherent purposefulness on intent for use (and humour). A contradiction in terms is probably more what you meant. :P armareum 18:32, 8 June 2007 (BST)

4. Kill - Opens the door to a lot of pretty tasteless things, like kill-the-jew missions etc. --Toejam 15:22, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - What you mean something like this? doing tastefull or tasteless things depends on the users, not on additions to the game--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:34, 8 June 2007 (BST)

5. Kill Whoah there. One Re per vote there, pal. --Magentaine 18:11, 8 June 2007 (BST)
6. Kill - Because if we did this, we're gonna have a lot of people requesting their religion to be put in. Yeah, Kevan could just ignore all the other requests, but I've seen some pretty heated up religious Zealots before, and if killing this suggestion means I won't have to see it again, great. If we can work this in with everyone's wants and needs, be my guest. Also, as someone touched up on it, the religious fighting that could erupt wouldn't be too pretty either. A dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 18:56, 8 June 2007 (BST)
7. Kill 1. This author's an athiest. 2. We don't need more divisons, more conflict in Malton. Nalikill 20:24, 8 June 2007 (BST)
8. Kill Just a bad idea. --Slowwber 20:37, 8 June 2007 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - This just sounds like Political Correctness to me. I don't see any benefit, or need. armareum 10:06, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Well the benefits are in the role playing aspect of the game, althought I admit there's no benefit beyond flavour. And for the politically correct part I'm an Atheist since my 10th birthday and in my honest opinion all religions are just scams--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 10:20, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - I wasn't trying to say that you were suggesting this to be PC, since I saw your origin of this suggestion. However since it's such a pointless addition, any inclusion would only be PC, as far as I can see. It's not inconceivable that a town in UK only has Churches. armareum 11:45, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Malton is a city not a town, find me and english city wich has 5 cathedrals an not even one temple of a non christian religion and I will delete the suggestion myself--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:12, 8 June 2007 (BST)

2. Total Dupe. Yes, I am lazy and cannot be bothered finding the link. However, name changes for the religious buildings has been suggested many times. Please check the archives before you suggest something people! Also, There would be many more churches than mosques and synagogues. It's England. Protestant capital of the world. The Anglican church anyone? --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 03:55, 9 June 2007 (BST)

   I did seach for it, and didnt find it, and on the protestant, and all the other religions that are branches of the christianity (more than 20 check the link on the suggestion) almost all of them call "church" to their places of adoration (althought is true some of them use "temple"). I'm not saying all should be renamed, just 3 or 4 in total--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 04:59, 9 June 2007 (BST)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:Che13/Sandbox). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)

1. Kill - What does this have to do with anything? The buildings are in place now and in any well sized american or british town the likelyness of finding a noncatholic/christian church is extremely low. Just assume Malton either didn't have any or the portion of malton closed off didn't have any. Problem solved.--karek 10:27, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - well, there ar a lot of changes like this in Peer reviewed so, I dont think that makes a valid point--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 10:34, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Oh yay, the peer reviewed argument. A lot of crap gets into peer reviewed, some good some bad. Just because it's in peer reviewed doesn't means it stands a snowballs chance in hell of getting into the game. And recent comments by Kevan make the fact that this will probably never happen quite clear.--karek 11:16, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Re - Well, aparently quoting kevan is just like quoting the bible :P, you can prove anything you want look: A new Malton (and in fact the part you quoted has a lots off maybes and probably, and should, so I dont see it soo clear as you do--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:01, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   That has nothing to do with changing building names(this would require renaming churches to mosques, etc.). It was about changing building descriptions and the stuff you find in them, yeah he mentioned renaming things, he also mentioned the problems it would cause which is a perfect reason why this should be killed. Your point still kinda sucks and all this would do is change something that has been perfectly fine for something like 2 years now with no real reason other than necklaces and PC. As I said before there aren't any reasons why this should be done and your argument is very lacking. And if you want to continue this any further I suggest moving it to the talk page. P.s. Vista, even if he is that doesn't change my vote, I still think it is a horrible idea with more problems than it's worth. --karek 15:12, 8 June 2007 (BST)

   Your own qoute was about changing building names, but apparently you are as stubern as I am, so I see no point in moving it to the talk page, since it would be a waste of both your time and mine--♠ Che ♠-^{T GC X} 15:25, 8 June 2007 (BST)

	Less Active
	This user will be less active sporadically because he's being good and taking care of his grandma. Just leave any messages you might have on the talk page..