UDWiki talk:Administration/Sysop Archives/Krazy Monkey/2008-02-11 Promotion

Krazy Monkey (Cheeseman) Promotion bid discussions

1. Against - I want to see an approved policy from you before I vouch. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
   • Fair enough. What sort of areas should I look at to come up with a policy change suggestion? -- Cheese 22:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
     • Something that might be a problem? Like the mess in the Suggestion Rejected and Undecided category? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 22:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
       • I can't realy vote yet. Could you maybe add a couple of links to your contributions you're most proud of? Any particuarly troublesome disputes or squabbles you worked out? Pages you designed? Help given? Stuff like that realy.--Seventythree^Talk 23:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
         • Ok. :) First off theres my group page, just purely to plug it. I also helped out Xela798 to sort out the original mess that was the Sinclair Hotels page: [1] into something slightly more useful and editable by sticking virtually most of the content onto various subpages to leave it as this: [2] Its now currently at this state. (Wasn't me but I still helped out a fair bit. :D) I've also done quite a lot of newbie helping and fixed broken bits and pieces on their pages, nothing major but I do get thanked quite a bit by them which is nice. Its nothing too major I do, just really sticking to the background and giving people that bit of a leg up and advice. -- Cheese 23:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

   Group pages don't count. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

   Ok then. I was the founder of the Clothing Suggestions page (which is now pretty popular) and it was my failed suggestion that was used as the raw material for the implementation. I also got kilts into the game. :D -- Cheese 23:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

   The clothing suggestion page is good for this....just not the extra info of you getting kilts into the game... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

   That should realy have been part of your origonal statement. Put up everything you're proud of. I know it feels kinda bostful, but how else are people gonna judge you?--Seventythree^Talk 23:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

1. Against - Trenchcoater, no sense of balance (Demonstrated from suggestions), and all round lacks the maturity required, not to mention a complete absence of anything required to make a balanced and impartial decision based on all the facts. Id sooner vouch for Nalikill. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 19:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   That was a lie, and you know it. :/ --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   What was a lie? And please dont edit conflcit me seconds after i make a comment as im trying to fix something with it. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 19:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Trenchcoater?! >:( I am no trenchie!! I eat cheese for breakfast and I keep my t-shirt nice and clean thank you very much. >:( Asshat. -- Cheese 19:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   All your characters are harmanz, three of which are in the DEM, which is heavily trenchie in its own right, and then theres the fact that your suggestions entirely suck for all zombies. You are a trenchcoater. Like it or not, thats what you are. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 19:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   I beg to differ, chum: I run two zombie characters, one with Brain Rot, another on its way up. Two of my DEM alts are retired and even then the one thats left is an RP monkey who revives people. I also have started running a crazy mental PKer character so don't call me a trenchie without getting your facts right. Also, several of my suggestions have been zombie related and a few of them have got into PR so I think you should retract that statement because it just makes you look bitter. -- Cheese 19:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Nevermind. Oh, and it was one minute... :) --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 19:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Edit conflicts make me >:( And I personally will ignore Grim's comment as he's just jealous of my awesomeness and helpfulness. -- Cheese 19:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Ignore Grimch, he is an immature, zed trenchcoater who thinks he is better than anyone else, to say the least.(basically an ass) How he ever became sysops is mystery to me. If he had balls, he would let himself be evaluated by the community.--MisterGame 20:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Why would it matter if he was a trenchcoater? Karek displays a very heavy zombie bias and no one held it against him in his recent promotion bid. Likewise Grim tends to favour zeds over Harmans (though nowhere near so fervently!) What side you choose to play and what style you choose to play it in have nothing to do with a sysops ability to perform janitorial duties and even if they did this wiki is supposedly dominated by the survivor players and the trenchies in particular so why shouldn't they have a voice in the sysop team? As for his lack of judgement... I am still thinking about that one as I mainly see "Cheeseman" on the suggestion pages which is not a good enough guide --Honestmistake 21:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

   Actually quite a few people did.--Karek^maps?! 07:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

   Funny that everyone has focused on the first part of what Grim said and not the second. The trenchcoater remark was such an obvious ploy to get Krazy to react and thus validate Grims comment about lacking maturity. - Jedaz - 03:17/13/02/2008

   I'm just bathing in the wonderful irony of Grim lecturing someone on balanced decision-making in the first place. --Funt Solo ^QT 12:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)