Suggestion:20100421 Shooting from Buildings: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Protected "Suggestion:20100421 Shooting from Buildings": Scheduled [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Spam|0|2|8}} | |||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
'''Kill Votes''' | '''Kill Votes''' | ||
#[http://www.urbandead.com/stats.html Explain to me where on this page the huge advantage for zombies is and I'll vote keep.] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:20, 21 April 2010 (BST) | |||
#'''Kill''' Even with the accuracy nerf, it's still too powerful. What if they were in a mall and just sat there searching for ammo and shooting at zombies? Way too overpowered, especially in sieges. {{User:Quentin Julius/Sig2}} 01:15, 22 April 2010 (BST) | |||
'''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | '''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | ||
| Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
#'''Spam''' - I hate making spam votes, but this is just blatant... --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 07:41, 21 April 2010 (BST) | #'''Spam''' - I hate making spam votes, but this is just blatant... --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 07:41, 21 April 2010 (BST) | ||
#'''SPam''' - As above.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:49, 21 April 2010 (BST) | #'''SPam''' - As above.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:49, 21 April 2010 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' this is shit, you are shit, learn to read. I was going to vote spam without reading the suggestion because from the page name I knew exactly what it was going to be, but thought it would be better of me to read it. It was exactly what I expected, some shithouse imbalanced, dupey and idiotic idea about shooting from buildings and making it harder for zombies '''even though the poor cunts have been in the minority for a goddamn fucking year'''. zombies do <BIG><BIG>not</BIG></BIG> have a massive advantage over survivors, and the more times a month I hear the opposiute said from noobshits the more a piece of my heart dies. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 09:10, 21 April 2010 (BST) | |||
< | #'''Ker-spam!''' Absolutely no way. This suggestion fails on so many points. <span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC, Segoe Script, Comic Sans MS, sans-serif;text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.4em">[[User:Chief Seagull|<span style="color: green;">Chief Seagull</span>]] [[User talk:Chief Seagull|<small>squawk</small>]]</span> [http://tinyurl.com/yfrld3r <sup><small>don't mess with the Seagull!</small></sup>] 10:13, 21 April 2010 (BST) | ||
< | #'''Spam''' - In the "advice to voters" section below, look at number 2.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 11:45, 21 April 2010 (BST) | ||
---- | #'''Spam''' - Is it considered an offensive threat for me to ask him if he wants to cut a hole in his head and let all the stupid run out? Someone let me know.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:27, 22 April 2010 (BST) | ||
#'''Spam''' - As DDR. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 00:51, 22 April 2010 (BST) | |||
{{ | |||
Latest revision as of 01:57, 22 April 2010
|
Spam! |
| This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 2 kill, and 8 spam votes. |
20100421 Shooting from Buildings
OscarGoldmeyer 07:25, 21 April 2010 (BST)
Suggestion type
Marksman, Survivor protection
Suggestion scope
Survivors killing zombies
Suggestion description
Ability to shoot zombies gathered outside barricaded buildings from within.
Survivors should be able to shoot from barricaded buildings at zombies with the accuracy of pistols and shotguns reduced by 33%. Also requiring 2 AP. A new skill 'Marksman' would be required for this ability.
Skill requirements: Military 75xp, Civilian 100xp, Scientist 150xp.
This is aimed to balance out the huge advantage zombies have over survivors without swaying favour too far in their direction.
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
| The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
Kill Votes
- Explain to me where on this page the huge advantage for zombies is and I'll vote keep. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:20, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Kill Even with the accuracy nerf, it's still too powerful. What if they were in a mall and just sat there searching for ammo and shooting at zombies? Way too overpowered, especially in sieges. Q. JuliusTBH 01:15, 22 April 2010 (BST)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam - Need I say more? —Aichon— 07:36, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Spam - I hate making spam votes, but this is just blatant... --Maverick Talk - OBR
404 07:41, 21 April 2010 (BST) - SPam - As above.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 07:49, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Spam this is shit, you are shit, learn to read. I was going to vote spam without reading the suggestion because from the page name I knew exactly what it was going to be, but thought it would be better of me to read it. It was exactly what I expected, some shithouse imbalanced, dupey and idiotic idea about shooting from buildings and making it harder for zombies even though the poor cunts have been in the minority for a goddamn fucking year. zombies do not have a massive advantage over survivors, and the more times a month I hear the opposiute said from noobshits the more a piece of my heart dies. -- 09:10, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Ker-spam! Absolutely no way. This suggestion fails on so many points. Chief Seagull squawk don't mess with the Seagull! 10:13, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Spam - In the "advice to voters" section below, look at number 2.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 11:45, 21 April 2010 (BST)
- Spam - Is it considered an offensive threat for me to ask him if he wants to cut a hole in his head and let all the stupid run out? Someone let me know. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 00:27, 22 April 2010 (BST)
- Spam - As DDR. --VVV RPMBG 00:51, 22 April 2010 (BST)
