UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Conndraka/2006-04-22 Promotion

Administration » Sysop Archives » Conndraka » 2006-04-22 Promotion

This page is an archive of Conndraka's Promotions candidacy. If you wish to speak with this candidate, please use their Talk page. If you believe that the candidate has abused the abilities and privileges granted them by this promotion, please report them for misconduct.

Conndraka

My first edits began in November as I started to get a feel for the Wiki process. Admittedly a large portion of the location tabs I intially created were not up to snuff, but were created prior to Novelty's work on the locations styleguide. However, unlike the location stubs (many of which still need to be re-worked to comply with the styleguide) the significant number of DHPD pages I developed and/or edited when given the opportunity to use my creativity. I created the profile that DHPD officers use on their user pages and have instructed others on how to use certain basic editing functions for the Wiki. I have searched for and uploaded numerous images to be used for location stubs and other purposes. Wether or not I might be chosen as a Mod, I would like to eventually use the style guide to finish mapping out the entirety of Malton, with individual pictures for each location. Duties I would like to perform would include Vandal reverts and constructive criticsm on the various suggestions pages. Duties I beleive I am espescially suited for... well to put it lightly Drama-Difusement and Arbitration of conflicts. People can have disagreements and even despise each other yet still respect each others efforts. Likewise you can disagree withsomeone and still respect their point of view (to quote Chris Rock "I would never do that...But I understand" Outside of the Wiki, I created and maintain the DHPD pro-board that although only has about 185 active posters, its got a rather sizable number of posts on a regular basis. Outside of Urban dead I am fairly active in various sites involving political and religious discussions.

• For --Cyberbob240^{CDF | Arb} 02:31, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• For I get the impression that you're a level headed guy. --Sirens^{T RR} 17:36, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• I would support Con. --Zaruthustra-Mod 18:57, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• I support Conndraka. --Brizth ^{W! M T} 19:02, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• Has admitted he was wrong in a fairly major issue elsewhere. That takes serious balls, and the willingness to do right at cost to ones self, a fairly important trait in my opinion. That and the fact he is a good contributor gets my vouch. --Grim s-^Mod 20:09, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• For - This one time, Conndraka and I were holding up a liquor store in Mexico and the policia were out there, yelling "Manos ariba! Manos ariba!" Then Conn was like, "Lets off some of these mo-fuckin' hostages!" and was about to, when Kevan started saying, "It's over, man! It's over! Game over, man!" Suddenly, Conn let out a shrill, horrifying "ARRRRRRRIBA!!!" that must have been straight from the very bowels of hell, kicked down the door, and came out blastin'. Meanwhile, I'm back in the liquor store tripping some bad acid and trying to think of a way out. I'm not quite sure how I made it back, but it probably involved Conn's time machine, which he forgot about while shootin' at the razzies. Anyway, a month later, I manage to get out of Mexico and find out Conn's trying to be a moderator. That's how Conn rolls. Fuck. --Ron Burgundy 23:35, 22 April 2006 (BST)
• For - I support Conndraka --Ali2234 13:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
• For - Yeah, he takes his lumps when he needs to.--Jorm 22:47, 23 April 2006 (BST)
• For - What Ron said. MaulMachine 04:29, 24 April 2006 (BST)
• For - A class act. I've got no qualms. --Prosperina 04:33 24 April 2006 (BST)
• For - I also echo the sentiments of Mr. Burgundy--Bermudez 16:28, 24 April 2006 (BST)
• For - Helpful, diplomatic, patient, and active. All around good choice. Bobsnpiece 19:06, 24 April 2006 (BST)
• For - Yeah, sure. Petrosjko 08:46, 25 April 2006 (BST)
• I vouch for Conndraka--Vista ^W! 11:17, 25 April 2006 (BST)
• I think you could make a good Mod, but none of the listed duties (Vandal Reverts, Suggestions Criticism, and Arbitration if I'm reading this right) really require Moderator privelages. However you've got the community experience to be one, and I am vouching for you. I just think you may want to look over your reasons. – Nubis ^NWO 11:56, 25 April 2006 (BST)
• Vouch - I think he will make a good addition to the moderation team. --John Rove 23:08, 30 April 2006 (BST)
• Undecided - I believe that you would make a good moderator. Nonetheless, you don't get my vouch. Don't get me wrong here, you've come a long way since the location stubs, and are still improving, but I'm not sure you'd need moderator status to continue to do the good job you do. Unless you are willing to pick up duties other than those that you have listed, I don't see the need for you to become a moderator. –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 15:19, 5 May 2006 (BST)