Suggestion:20090125 Rotting Flesh: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Suggestion:20090125 Rotting Flesh": Shed [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
{{Spam|0|1|9}} | |||
{{Suggestion Navigation}} | {{Suggestion Navigation}} | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Kill Votes''' | '''Kill Votes''' | ||
#'''Kill''' - I'm pro-survivor, and even I don't like this idea. It's unfair that zombies should work that hard to buy that skill only to have it be useless after a few attacks. Sarrah, Harman. --[[User:BlackstarC|BlackstarC]] 22:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
'''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | '''Spam/Dupe Votes''' | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
#'''Spam''' - [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Other_Players|No retroactive penalties]]. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>|[[User talk:Midianian|T]]|[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]|[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]|</sup></small> 18:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | #'''Spam''' - [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Other_Players|No retroactive penalties]]. --[[User:Midianian|Midianian]]<small><sup>|[[User talk:Midianian|T]]|[[Developing Suggestions|DS]]|[[:Category:Recently Closed Suggestions|C:RCS]]|</sup></small> 18:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Spam''' - Erm...no. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | #'''Spam''' - Erm...no. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Spam''' - One of the worst suggestions in a long time. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 18:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
#'''Spam''' - Shit like this is why the early cycling clause should be in the hands of users that understand the suggestions system and not in the hands of a group of politicking self identified elitists. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 18:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
#'''Spam''' "Suggestions may not be removed as spam unless voting has been open for 6 hours." --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- | #'''Spam''' - I'm pro-survivor, and I disapprove of this suggestion. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 19:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#'''Spam''' - As above. --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{ | #'''Spam''' - Unfair for people who have already brought Flesh Rot , and you fail to mention if it crosses over to survivors (and yes, rotters survivors exist.) {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 00:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
[[ | |||
Latest revision as of 00:35, 26 January 2009
|
Spam! |
| This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 1 kill, and 9 spam votes. |
20090125 Rotting Flesh
Kid Ninja 16:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion type
Skill
Suggestion scope
Everyone
Suggestion description
Survivors haven't had an useful update in a while so here's one. Any zombie with rotting flesh would still have the blocking powers and absorb 1 point. But there would be a 25%(variable) chance that the rotting flesh would be even weaker than normal, causing the zombie to take 6 damage from a pistol shot and 11 from a shotgun.Ex. Bob sees a zombie. Bob shoots zombie with pistol. Rotting flesh absorbs 1 point, causing 4 damage. Bob does this some more. After a few shots Bob shotts zombie with pistol. Rotting Flesh gives way to regular flesh, causing 6 damage instead of 5 or 4 damage.
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user. |
| The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
Keep Votes
Kill Votes
- Kill - I'm pro-survivor, and even I don't like this idea. It's unfair that zombies should work that hard to buy that skill only to have it be useless after a few attacks. Sarrah, Harman. --BlackstarC 22:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Spam/Dupe Votes
- Spam- Unecessary, the maths of this negates the damge reduction of Flesh Rot by half. And why is such a drastic thing needed? Liberty 17:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - No retroactive penalties. --Midianian|T|DS|C:RCS| 18:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - Erm...no. -- Cheese 18:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - One of the worst suggestions in a long time. --WanYao 18:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - Shit like this is why the early cycling clause should be in the hands of users that understand the suggestions system and not in the hands of a group of politicking self identified elitists. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 18:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC) - Spam "Suggestions may not be removed as spam unless voting has been open for 6 hours." --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - I'm pro-survivor, and I disapprove of this suggestion. --Blake Firedancer T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T. 19:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - As above. --Private Mark 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Spam - Unfair for people who have already brought Flesh Rot , and you fail to mention if it crosses over to survivors (and yes, rotters survivors exist.) Linkthewindow Talk 00:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
