Suggestion:20090125 Rotting Flesh

	Spam!
	This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 1 kill, and 9 spam votes.

20090125 Rotting Flesh

Kid Ninja 16:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Skill

Suggestion scope
Everyone

Suggestion description
Survivors haven't had an useful update in a while so here's one. Any zombie with rotting flesh would still have the blocking powers and absorb 1 point. But there would be a 25%(variable) chance that the rotting flesh would be even weaker than normal, causing the zombie to take 6 damage from a pistol shot and 11 from a shotgun.Ex. Bob sees a zombie. Bob shoots zombie with pistol. Rotting flesh absorbs 1 point, causing 4 damage. Bob does this some more. After a few shots Bob shotts zombie with pistol. Rotting Flesh gives way to regular flesh, causing 6 damage instead of 5 or 4 damage.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

Kill Votes

1. Kill - I'm pro-survivor, and even I don't like this idea. It's unfair that zombies should work that hard to buy that skill only to have it be useless after a few attacks. Sarrah, Harman. --BlackstarC 22:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam- Unecessary, the maths of this negates the damge reduction of Flesh Rot by half. And why is such a drastic thing needed? Liberty 17:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
2. Spam - No retroactive penalties. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 18:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
3. Spam - Erm...no. -- Cheese 18:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
4. Spam - One of the worst suggestions in a long time. --WanYao 18:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
5. Spam - Shit like this is why the early cycling clause should be in the hands of users that understand the suggestions system and not in the hands of a group of politicking self identified elitists. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
6. Spam "Suggestions may not be removed as spam unless voting has been open for 6 hours." --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
7. Spam - I'm pro-survivor, and I disapprove of this suggestion. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 19:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
8. Spam - As above. --Private Mark 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
9. Spam - Unfair for people who have already brought Flesh Rot , and you fail to mention if it crosses over to survivors (and yes, rotters survivors exist.) Linkthewindow  Talk  00:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)