UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Data

Where is PQN?

Shouldn't the various PNQ's be on here too? --Mia K ^(sotss) 15:23, 11 April 2006 (BST)

PQNs. And yeah, that does suprise me, I thought he'd have gotten a dishonourable mention at the very least. He's our most frequent vandal, isn't he? –Xoid ^S•T•FU! 09:24, 29 April 2006 (BST)

It's probably because of his use of alts.--The General ^{W! Mod} 12:42, 29 April 2006 (BST)

Record

Whoo Hoo! Criminal Record! --Duce Nauks 00:48, 4 April 2006 (BST)

Protection

Should this page be protected until moderators add data? It would seem data added from users would always seem suspicious and you'd have to get conformation that that was what happened. --ALIENwolve 22:56, 17 February 2006 (GMT)

That doesn't seem like it's necessarily a bad thing. I'd expect everyone to share in the confirmation process. -- Odd Starter ^{talk | Mod | W!} 23:01, 17 February 2006 (GMT)

Oprah... and other stuff

I've done a major reworking of the page, converting stuff, neatening, etc, trying to bring some level of conformity there, as well as adding some dates for those cases that are still on M/VB.

A couple of things:

1. Should Note: also hosts a crappy TV show. be added under Oprah's heading?
2. Please note that I've removed the "this user is also Denzel Washington" type crap that Karlsbad added for Banana Bear4, who I'm certain is not Denzel Washington. I see no reason to place that there, just because of Legend X's delusion.

–Xoid ^S•T•FU! 17:40, 11 July 2006 (BST)

Curious about this.

I see two warnings for Thom, then a ban. What was the ban for? I only see the two vandal banning cases for him. For that matter, why warn someone for something they did without knowing the rule a second time. I can understand once, but if both edits were before the original warning, how are they supposed to correct the behavior? Doesn't that unfairly punish the new guys? Just an opinion. Jjames 19:25, 20 August 2006 (BST)

Um, what bad? I only see two warnings. And checking the logs, he hasn't been banned. I can't say about the warnings, better ask CyberBobHammero --Brizth ^{M T} 21:24, 20 August 2006 (BST)

Kevan is banned?

How come is claims that kevan was banned? And, yes, I know it says it's impersonation, but it seems to link to the real account.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 13:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

It has something to do with the type of hml used to put unusual charachters in the name, but is still recognised by some parts of the wikisoft as regular charachters. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 14:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hm? That can't be the case, if the software doesn't differentiate between the two the links, it wouldn't have been possible to create an account with that name in the first place. More likely someone got lazy and typed it in, instead of doing CnP. Either that or they do not have UTF-8 enabled and mutilated it when they did. –Xoid ^M•T•FU! 14:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Most likely the first case, browsers tend to just cut the unrecognised letter out, rather than replace it with a normal one.--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 14:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I still find that amusing, banned on his own wiki, ahh the shame.--xoxo 07:42, 21 April 2008 (BST)

Warnings Struck

Hows does that happen? and if its because of x number of edits then how does one find out how many edits one has made since last getting convicted?--Jed 05:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Magic --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 06:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

i don't think i've ever read something so bureaucratically complex. I think i get it thought. And the second part of my original query?--Jed 07:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Check

Can someone check how many more edits I have left until mah vandalism is gone? I think I passed 250 but I'm not sure how to check if I have...--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 03:34, 12 June 2008 (BST)

Go to your userpage, click user contributions on the left dsidebar, and expand to show the last 250 edits. The rest is a no brainer. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 03:39, 12 June 2008 (BST)

The Hell?

In checking against current claims it seems that J3D's A/VD doesn't actually match the A/VB Archives. At least one inconsistency is that he was escalated at least twice in this page and it has me wondering if there is more and how this happened.--Karek^maps?! 06:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

It could be in the striking maybe? I have had warnings struck where nobody has documented it. I think it may have been Cheese who did that with me, or Grim. Can't remember.--CyberRead240 06:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I think sysops sometimes rule on cases but don't go ahead and escalate for fear of people disagreeing and them getting in shit for acting prematurely. Nothing happens, and eventually the cases are forgotten. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 06:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

They were acted on.--Karek^maps?! 06:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, some idiot must have struck them but instead of putting a line through them they deleted them. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 06:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Possibly. Still means someone is going to have to go over this page vs. the archives.--Karek^maps?! 06:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Off you trot then. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 06:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)