Suggestion:20100302 Broadcaster

Suggestion:20100302 Broadcaster

Time: George Zip ^◆◆◆ 01:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Type: Survivor skill

Description: Allows longer transmissions from radio operators.

This is very simple: It's just a skill you can buy once you have "Radio Operation," for the same amount of XP (variable, based on your class). Once you have broadcasting, you can transmit the full 250 characters of text you get when normally speaking.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. . I couldn't find any evidence that this has been suggested before. -George Zip ^◆◆◆ 01:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
2. Keep - Why? Because at least it means annoying radio chatter takes up less room on the page. 16:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3. Keep - I like this, although it does mean spammers have more room to spam, it does allow those that do use the radio responsibly to communicate better. Jpanzer 16:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

3. Keep - I think this is a great idea, but I agree with Jpanzer that it does give a bigger opportunity for spammers, still communication skills are great as long as it remains balanced i.e. "Broadcaster" for humans, and some upgraded comms skill for zeds. User: Thomas Orion/Thomas Orion 18:26, 13 March 2010 (GMT)

Kill Votes

1. . Too much spam on the radio as it is. I don't see a reason to allow text rapists even more room to spew their filth --Technerd ^{CFT U!} 02:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
2. Kill - There's no reason to allow it. The current limit helps to keep the spam down a bit. This would cause it to explode 500%. —Aichon— 06:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
3. Kill - I see, so now text rapist aren't limited to a few buildings per day... Now they can rape the entire channel with AP to spare. Good in concept, bad if actually implemented. -Devorac 07:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
4. Kill - As above.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 07:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
5. Kill- See above --
    
    
    
    
   08:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
6. Kill - I really, really, really wish I could vote keep on this one, but the above reasoning is just too large of an elephant to ignore for something like this. --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 09:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
7. Kill - Would be nice... but would also invoke the not-so-nice. --Private Mark 22:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
8. Kill - As much as I like the idea of speaking with a polished broadcaster voice, it does seem that spam and server load would be increased by implementation of the suggestion.--_GANG Giles Sednik _CAPD 09:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
9. Kill - Would be nice to have a new skill; but that will never happen, aside from that you would just end up getting longer spam on the radio as others have said.--Truezombieboy 06:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
10. Kill - As others have already said, there's nothing wrong with this suggestion, and it's reasonable, but unfortunately it would give spammers a lot more room to spam. While this could helps survivors broadcast more easily, it would certainly be abused to the point where it's not worth it. --Fujiko Mine 16:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - Because that's all that will come of this being implemented. --Papa Moloch 05:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

   SPAM ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 18:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC) - Justify your vote. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

2. Spam - The current limit exists to reduce server strain. Keep pushing the server and we have outages, like we did during On Strike, which is what caused the new limits on speaking. I'd remind all that there is no upper limit on who hears a radio broadcast, unlike speech which is limited to 50 accounts hearing the message and 250 characters per message. Each current stupid message (see the Pitneybank frequency) has no limit to the amount of work the server has to do other than the 50 character limit. You pay extra AP to get to reach an audience of more than 50 in order to protect the game itself from crashing. Deal with it. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 18:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3. Spam - As Isc. Learn to be concise. --Ocular ^Druuuuu 07:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100302 Broadcaster). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)