Suggestion:20100519 Increase variety of useful melee weapons: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 81: Line 81:
#'''Kill''' - As VVV, but since there seemed to be some actual intelligence behind this suggestion I'm not going to Spam it. Better luck next time. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 08:15, 20 May 2010 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - As VVV, but since there seemed to be some actual intelligence behind this suggestion I'm not going to Spam it. Better luck next time. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 08:15, 20 May 2010 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - It's unrealistic, and I can't find a good use for it for RPing purposes... --[[User:Colette Hart|Colette Hart]] 01:31, 23 May 2010 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - It's unrealistic, and I can't find a good use for it for RPing purposes... --[[User:Colette Hart|Colette Hart]] 01:31, 23 May 2010 (BST)
#'''Kill''' - In all honesty, this suggestion sounds like it would lower RP purposes and realism, as weapons which would would not normally be as deadly as a fireaxe (such as a pool cue) suddenly have the same stopping power as a bladed, meant-to-break-things tool. For that reason, I cannot stand behind this. --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 02:41, 23 May 2010 (BST)


'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''
'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''

Revision as of 01:41, 23 May 2010

Suggestion Navigation
Suggestion Portal
Current SuggestionsSuggestions up for VotingClothes Suggestions
Cycling SuggestionsPeer ReviewedUndecidedPeer RejectedHumorous
Suggestion AdviceTopics to Avoid and WhyHelp, Developing and Editing


20100519 Increase variety of useful melee weapons

CorndogheroT-S-Z 07:07, 19 May 2010 (BST)


Suggestion type
New Skills in order to adjust weapon balance


Suggestion scope
Anyone who might use, or come in contact with, a melee weapon; roleplayers


Suggestion description
As we all know, out of the many melee weapons available for player use, only two really have any usefulness: The Fire Axe primarily, and the Knife having a much more situational, and therefore less common usefulness. But really, it just doesn't seem right that in a zombie apocalypse, everyone is using the exact same weapon; however, no one but the most hardcore of roleplayers is going to sacrifice their AP efficiency in order to create a more believable setting.

Therefore, I propose that upon the acquisition of every survivor skill, a survivor gains the ability to purchase the zombie hunter skill "Improvised Weapon Mastery"; and that upon the acquisition of all zombie skills sans brain rot and such subskills, a zombie gains access to the skill "Fiendish Grip". These skills would be slightly different numbers-wise, but would serve identical purposes.

First, Improvised weapon mastery. In short, what this skill would do would be to buff the accuracy and damage of any melee weapon that has no secondary purpose (i.e. the cricket bat would be buffed, but not the toolbox) to the accuracy and damage levels of either the Fire Axe or the Knife.

The list:

Fire Axe stats:

  • Crowbar (Its secondary purpose is obsolete by the time the requirements for this skill have been fulfilled. However, its hit rate against barricades is not buffed)
  • Baseball Bat
  • Length of Pipe (see crowbar)
  • Cricket Bat
  • Hockey Stick
  • Beer/Wine bottles

Knife stats:

  • Fencing Foil
  • Ski pole
  • Golf Club
  • Tennis Racket
  • Pool Cue (would also lose its chance of breaking)

And for the Zombies' Fiendish Grip, the effect would be similar: Zombies would gain access to every melee weapon, and each of these would be buffed to the accuracy and damage levels of a maxed out zombie claw; this includes those with other uses such as toolboxes, as zombies cannot access those functions.

Some have raised concerns on the Developing Suggestions page about survivors having full combat ability with certain weapons, among other aspects of this suggestion. I'll address those concerns briefly:

Note that a survivor must have all survivor skills in order to have Improvised Weapon Mastery; therefore, functions which are only helpful to newbies do not count as a secondary function.

  • Crowbars: When a survivor has full axe skill, their barricade hit rate is the same whether they use an axe or a crowbar.
  • Pipes: A maxed-out survivor has the construction skill already
  • Bottles: The purpose of excluding weapons with other functions is so as not to provide a survivor buff by removing the need to carry a weapon in addition to useful items. Bottles, however, break when used in combat, and so one must still use a conventional weapon most of the time.
  • Zombie Use of melee items: Some may argue that it is not in flavor for zombies to use melee weapons. I would disagree with this assertion; many forms of zombie entertainment depict zombies fighting with whatever blunt instrument they were holding at the time of their death. In addition, it's not like every zombie would use this; just High-Level zombies who want to take the trouble to get a melee weapon. Most would use claws, but some would use weapons and lend a little variety.
  • Tangling Grasp: Fiendish Grip would indeed be compatible with tangling grasp (hold in one hand and bash with the other). After all, this suggestion is to increase flavor/RP options without changing combat.

Hopefully this suggestion would increase the variety of weapons and roleplaying seen throughout Malton.


Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped.
# justification ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.


Keep Votes

  1. Keep Author Keep--CorndogheroT-S-Z 07:08, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  2. Keep though change the names of the skills, probably. 'Improvisation' and 'Muscle Memory' perhaps? Strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others 16:10, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  3. Keep I have no idea why I like this. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:14, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  4. Keep Has some minor issues (like the hard-to-implement Fiendish Grip at 19 zombie skills), but is overall a good idea to increase variety. -- Spiderzed 18:18, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  5. Keep - My inability to efficiently pretend I am Shawn of the Dead irks me. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 22:37, 19 May 2010 (BST)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - Simply not a fan of the idea. Aichon 08:57, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  2. Kill - Melee is fine atm. And while I'm here, Improved Weapon Mastery is practically a name from from Diablo. Fiends Grip is something from Dota. Less fantasy RPG influence pls -- 09:39, 19 May 2010 (BST)
    Re:I've honestly never played either of those, I just went with the first decent names that popped into my head. Anyway, they are not the important part of the suggestion; it is the adjustment of weapon stats--CorndogheroT-S-Z 12:43, 19 May 2010 (BST)
    Right you are, however, that was just extraneous joking on the right of my actual reason, melee balance is fine, others are for the [god forsaken and ever-hated by me] "developer-endorsed roleplaying value". And even by RP value, this isn't particularly good. Tennis Racquets, Pool Sticks, etc shouldn't be able to kill as efficiently as a fire axe, but I'll leave it to the RP whingers to elaborate on those reasons. -- 13:30, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  3. Kill - while I agree with the sentiment of getting more use out of melee weapons ( my PKer likes a bit of variety), and the way these have been organised into "fire axe" and "knife" groups is good, I don't think an extra skill is the way to go here. As cool as whacking zombies with a cricket bat is, it's just not as deadly as an axe to the head. And the idea of zombies using weapons is a big no-no in my book - they have enough trouble just standing up. Chief Seagull squawk grown-ups agree with Nick 10:00, 19 May 2010 (BST)
    Re: If a zombie player has trouble just standing up, they are under no obligation to use anything but their innate attacks--CorndogheroT-S-Z 12:43, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  4. Kill - Because DDR mentioned Diablo in his vote.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:18, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  5. Kill - First, why would, say, a cricket bat do as much damage as an axe? And second, you should at least let the toolbox kill something easily. It's awesome! --AORDMOPRI ! T 21:51, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  6. Kill - As VVV, but since there seemed to be some actual intelligence behind this suggestion I'm not going to Spam it. Better luck next time. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 08:15, 20 May 2010 (BST)
  7. Kill - It's unrealistic, and I can't find a good use for it for RPing purposes... --Colette Hart 01:31, 23 May 2010 (BST)
  8. Kill - In all honesty, this suggestion sounds like it would lower RP purposes and realism, as weapons which would would not normally be as deadly as a fireaxe (such as a pool cue) suddenly have the same stopping power as a bladed, meant-to-break-things tool. For that reason, I cannot stand behind this. --Private Mark 02:41, 23 May 2010 (BST)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - So you're going to multiply the find-rates for knives and axes (or things that are axes or knives but happen to have different flavour text) by a factor of about a gajillion? And this is balanced how? Also, two silly new skills? No thanks. --WanYao 08:30, 19 May 2010 (BST)
    Re:By the time they can buy one of these skills, doubtless they already have their melee weapon--CorndogheroT-S-Z 12:43, 19 May 2010 (BST)
  2. Spam - I was originally going to vote kill on the grounds that adding skills is ridiculous, but Wan is right about the search boost. This is a massive, unnecessary change which would only serve to make the game less realistic. You may as well rename all melee weapons 'Fireaxe' for people with the skill. And no, the knife is far from useless. It's the one weapon I use the most. Furthermore, you are a terrible KISSer. --VVV RPMBG 05:37, 20 May 2010 (BST)



Voting Rules
Current Suggestions

Advice to Suggesters

  1. Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so.
  2. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed.
  3. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes.

Advice to Voters

  1. You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated.
  2. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote.
  3. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion.
  4. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam).
  5. It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion.
  6. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found.
  7. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.
Rules for Discussions

Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20100519 Increase variety of useful melee weapons). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes
  • Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit.
  • Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page.
  • Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions.
Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied.
  • Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion.
Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied.
  • Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}}
Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.
Invalid Votes
  • Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide.
  • X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others.
  • Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.
Comments
  • Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting.
  • Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.
All Caps

Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES

Keep Votes

  1. Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  3. Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Kill Votes

  1. Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
      • Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)
    • Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Spam/Dupe Votes

  1. Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)
  2. Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)