UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration: Difference between revisions
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Clearly the fair solution to this is to also include a picture of a massive wab there too. Simple. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | Clearly the fair solution to this is to also include a picture of a massive wab there too. Simple. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
Soooo... is something happening with this? [[User:JebJ|JebJ]] ([[User talk:JebJ|talk]]) 03:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
=Arbitration Cases in Progress= | =Arbitration Cases in Progress= |
Revision as of 03:35, 3 December 2014
While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.
Guidelines for Arbitration Requests
In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.
Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:
- The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
- The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
- Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.
Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.
As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.
After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.
Current Arbitrators
- For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.
The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}
Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.
Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order | ||||
Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration
Administration Notice |
Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section. |
JebJ v. Kristy Cotton
I would like to request arbitration for the Meany Auto Repair page. User Kirsty Cotton - http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Kirsty_cotton - and I are having a disagreement over whether a particular photo should be included there. I argue that the photo (and the associated text) is potentially offensive, and unnecessary to keep in the wiki (an opinion shared by Aichon - http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User_talk:Thanatologist#JebJ), whereas Kirsty believes that the photo and text add needed flavor to the game/wiki. JebJ (talk) 12:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Interesting case. I would be happy to arbitrate this case. A ZOMBIE ANT 22:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- I accept DDR. --K 04:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, that was just about the quickest setup to arbitration I've ever seen. DDR knows what to do next. —Aichon— 15:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Really! Really? Really. Sometimes I do wonder about this wiki. --Rosslessness 21:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Where did you find that private picture of ME!?!? --Sally A. Summers Ω 01:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Clearly the fair solution to this is to also include a picture of a massive wab there too. Simple. 23:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Soooo... is something happening with this? JebJ (talk) 03:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration Cases in Progress
There are currently no cases in progress.
Recently Concluded cases
There are currently no recently concluded cases, see the archives for older cases.