Suggestion talk:20081125 Depants

Potential for abuse

Really, a comment for Saralan as well, but rather then dupe my comment I'll just stick it here. I understand the concern, but really this is a game and meant to be fun. There are many elements of this game that could be offensive, and with the global span of the player base it is not hard to imagine people that may abuse this as suggeted. However, personally I think anyone that thinks Kevan would pass this suggestion without some defence equilivant to the "Ignore List" for text rapist is maybe reading too far into this suggestion in my opinion. --Gus Thomas^SpartaZHU 05:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I understand where you are coming from, Gus, but I have voted on the suggestion as it is: there is nothing in the explanation about a defence against people who would abuse the action. If there were, I would most likely remove my vote. --Saralan ^{Talk 404 ZHU ❤} 05:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Understandable, but as I understand the suggestion process (and I did read the library of links first) is that would be a seperate suggestion. For example, if speech wasnt in the game and it was suggested, the "ignore" option would be a separate one. Regardless, my position is and always will be that this is a game. If anyone is seriously offended or feels mistreated by it, I wonder why they play? --Gus Thomas^SpartaZHU 06:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

From Developing Suggestions

Discussion (Depants)

There is current discussion, as of today. - tylerisfat 08:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Kyle's comment below makes this current discussion again. Please consider removing this stamp :D--Gus Thomas^SpartaZHU 06:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, it's easy to do yourself, and assuming there is, it's fine to remove it. I might move this to the Overflow page as it's rather old. Thoughts? Linkthewindow  Talk  09:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

As personal policy, i try not to edit other people's comments etc. I am actually looking to put this up to vote, just waiting on help on how to do that. I wouldnt want to spam up voting with incorrect procedure :P --Gus Thomas^SpartaZHU 22:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, someone please inform Gus. (I don't know how to, either.)--Drugsanimudongs 13:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Look here. Linkthewindow  Talk  21:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. Trousers. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Win, win, win, win, and more win.--/~Rakuen~\^Talk I Still Love Grim 01:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

WTF CENTAUR - Epic win. --Haliman - Talk 01:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Attacking a human with no pants shouldn't cost AP. Drag doesn't have a penalty for trying to drag harmanz over 12 HP, neither does a normal attack on an invalid target, using an item on a dead body, etc. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Changed, thanks for pointing that out Rev. --Gus Thomas^SpartaZHU 02:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

No because I want my zombies to be brain craving fiends not pants snatching perverts--Honestmistake 09:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd vote keep, just because it's funny.--Studoku ^W! 17:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

While this will never get implemented, I will gladly vote keep if you put it up for voting.--JaredV 20:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Unless Wedgie is introduced I won't vote Keep on this.--– Nubis ^NWO 23:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm voteing keep to this, this stuff is good and could add a comdic moment in battle. --Ltpotter 15:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

This is hilarious, I'd vote yes. --Fiffy 21:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

My name is Dongs and I approve this suggestion. UD is a game. Games are meant to be fun. UD is competitive, yes, but above all, UD is FUN. APPROVE DEPANTS.--Drugsanimudongs 12:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

UD needs this skill. Harmanz must learn the joy zambahz experience with having no pants. Pants are ANTI-BARHAH --KyleStyle 06:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm Dick Johansonson and I approve of this skill. --Dick Johansonson 06:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

---