User talk:Cyberbob240/Classifications
SuggestionsAny suggestions for the list go here. Perhaps making a link to the persons classification? That way they don't have to search for it. Just kind of fishing for ways to make this better.-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 17:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC) Or an "evidence" link or something. THough that'd be a bit harsh. Well, as long as it's all done in a jokey way it'd be ok.--SeventythreeTalk 01:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Awww, I'm not on the list! --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 21:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
CommentsAny commentary on the list goes here. You have insulted me, sir. *Hurls a cream pie at you*.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 14:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to say that I do have patience for in-depth discussions, but more often than not, by the time I actually do find time to make my statement/give my opinion, someone has already said what I would have. I know. I'm still a loserific clown. :D -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Hilarious.--Karekmaps?! 04:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC) Heh. Made me laugth. How come I'm the only Enfent Provoceteur though? Oh well, guess i'd better up my nasty jokes to get into the evil clown category!--SeventythreeTalk 17:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Hm....So you're saying I sleep in bed with the most influential people on the wiki? I barely even know Matthewfahrient!--User:Axe27/Sig 03:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
|