Suggestion:20081206 Glowstick

	Spam!
	This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 4 keep, 4 kill, and 15 spam votes.

20081206 Glowstick

Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 03:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Item

Suggestion scope
People in dark buildings

Suggestion description
First, the statistics

• Encumberance: 2%
• Locations:

• Night Clubs (3% find rate when powered, 0% otherwise)
• Mall Sports Store (5% find rate when unpowered, +5% when powered, -3% when ruined)

When activated in a dark building, a glowstick allows you to see bodies and graffiti, and also gives a +10% attack hit percentage to all weapons you have (If the darkness attack percentage penalty for a weapon is below 10%, it will be restored to its full functionality). It does not effect search rates or anything else.

It also gives the same 10% hit bonus to all attacks against you by anyone else.

Glowsticks last for 6 hours and cannot be turned off.

Outside of a dark building, glowsticks have no effects.

When inside a dark building, all players will receive a notice when someone activates a glowstick, and the name/s of all those with active glowsticks will be listed on the page twice: once at the top with all the other names and again further down as Trenchman142, Googolheim and Example Page are holding glowsticks. Names here will not have the HP indicator if you have Diagnosis.

You cannot drop a glowstick once activated. It will be automatically dropped once it is used up.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Author's Keep vote - Justified --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 03:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Keep - I like it, but can't we just recolor the players' names in neon if they have glowsticks? -- Galaxy125 08:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   I suppose that could work too. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 09:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

3. Keep - We need some kind of light source thing... something needs to be done to try and tip the balance back into survivor's favor. --Ltpotter 12:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   On the other Hand you may want to re think this for a bit. Make them last shorter. I'll do the keep vote but you may want to rethink this. --Ltpotter 16:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

4. Keep/Change - Read the developing suggestions page? Making an object rare doesn't make it balanced. You need to increase the search rate somehow. --Angusburger 21:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

   It's not rare for the sake of balance, it's rare for the reason that they're the best places I could find to have 'em. Besides, there are plenty of clubs around Malton, Monroeville and, err, the other place. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 09:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Weak Kill - Admittedly, it's a heck of a lot better then the other Portable Light Suggestions that come through here, but I don't like the fact that it's only downside is that you also have a +10% chance of being hit, which can easily be circumvented by moving away from a dark building. Linkthewindow  Talk  08:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
2. Weak Kill - I don't like how zombies have to rely on survivors to get the equilvant of an effect that can be avoided by survivors just by an extra 1 AP.--G-Man 10:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   Yes, that is the major flaw in this suggestion. Try as I might, I couldn't figure out how to get around it. My so-far best solution was if I had the glowsticks 'deployable' (i.e. you throw it on the floor) so that even if the wielder left, the effect remained on everyone in the room. But, then you would have a fuel-less generator that can't be destroyed, so that would be unbalanced in its own right. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 08:20, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

3. Kill But we do need some way to see in dark buildings, other than placing a generator and having it destroyed while clearing it. --Secruss^|Yak|Brahnz!|CGR|PKA||EMLN|Templates|RRF|RFTM|Crap|WHOZ||MU|GN|C2008||01:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
4. Kill - I don't think glowsticks give off enough light to warrant the effects that are attributed to it in this suggestion. Also, really close to flashlights. --ZsL 07:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. GTFO - out of genre -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 14:01 6 December 2008 (BST)
2. Spam - A flashlight by any other name still sounds like shit.--Karek^maps?! 14:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
3. Spam - Survivor buff which doesn't help zombies where they got shafted most: in the dark buildings. Survivors just come in, do their stuff, leave -- thus, as I said, it's just a survivor buff. Atm survivors *might* getting a bit of a raw deal, so I'm not going to go on a pro-zombie rant... but... neither will I support an unbalanced buff.--WanYao 15:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   Yes, I have been considering that problem a lot lately. I've come up with a possible solution that I will put up on the Discussion page. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 09:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

4. Spam - Just Flashlight with a new name.--Drawde ^{Talk To Me! DORIS Red Rum Defend Ridleybonk! I know Nothing! Extinction Bottom Right Corner Is A Lie!} 16:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
5. Spam --Pestolence^(talk) 17:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
6. Spam - As above. --Papa Moloch 17:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
7. Spam/Dupe - I seem to recall someone saying they'd made a glowstick suggestion ages back. The point is, it's a portable light source dupe. --Yonnua Koponen 20:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   That was me, but I never took it out of the then-Talk:Suggestions. --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 03:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

8. Dupe - Replacements for generators in dark buildings are bad. Can someone add that to the frequently suggested list? --William Told 20:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

   It is already there. But, I corrected all the flaws listed there (unbalancing via. toggle, no zombie benefit, buffs to search rates and Surgery skill) --Blake Firedancer ^{T E RNL? P.I.S.I.T.} 03:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

9. Spam - GGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRR. I mean, as above. And dupey. - tylerisfat 00:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
10. Spam - Glowstick = accuracy boost? Don't make me laugh. The only in-game effect of glowsticks should be to make sweaty rave chicks look a bit hotter.--Jiangyingzi 14:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
11. Spam - Glowsticks do not give off enough light to do anything usefull. --Michaleson ^CAPD 15:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
12. Spam - As Jiangyingzi. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 13:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
13. Frog Blast The Vent Core! - As much as i like it, it's still spam. --Nny The Person 00:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
14. Spam - As Jiangyingzi.  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  05:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

---

Voting Rules

Current Suggestions Advice to Suggesters Adding options to your suggestion is not good practice. Others will not vote on the options, only the main body; please don't ask them to do so. Once you have posted your suggestion, it is considered complete. Altering the suggestion mechanics after voting has begun nullifies existing votes, and is considered an abuse of the suggestions system. Doing so will result in your suggestion being removed from the voting system to removed suggestions, where you can work out the details and resubmit later if you desire. It is preferred that you remove your own suggestion and resubmit a new version with changes, if changes are needed. "Notes" added for clarification purposes, and correcting spelling/typos are permitted. When considering adding a clarification note, it is often better for all parties involved, for the author to remove the suggestion and resubmit it with the clarification included for the voters who have already placed their votes. Advice to Voters You are voting on Suggestions, not Users. The text of your vote should not personally attack or denigrate the user who has submitted it... no matter how ridiculous the idea. Flaming and/or Trolling will not be tolerated. Before voting please read the Suggestions Dos and Do Nots and Frequently Suggested Ideas Page to read about concepts that have been generally considered unworkable in the past. You do not need to follow the guidelines on these pages but they are worth consideration before casting a vote. One vote per user. No exceptions. You cannot use multiple wiki accounts to vote on a suggestion. To Vote, use the [edit] button at the top of the voting section, then enter your vote in the the proper format to the end of the relevant section (keep/kill/spam). It is strongly recommended that voters (especially in the kill/spam sections) justify their vote to help others understand the reason they disagree. Feedback helps new suggesters get a feel for what the community does and does not want included in Urban Dead, and a deeper understanding of the balance needed for a workable suggestion. Votes must include a signature in order to be considered valid votes. To sign a vote, use --~~~~. Please remember to sign your votes! Unsigned votes will be deleted after 30 minutes or when found. Each Suggestion will be open to voting for two (2) weeks, measured from the suggestion's Timestamp, unless it is a Dupe or Spam. If, at the end of that time, there are two thirds (2/3) more Keep votes than Kill votes, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Reviewed Suggestions page. Otherwise, the Suggestion will be moved to the Peer Rejected Suggestions page.

Rules for Discussions Votes are NOT the place to discuss Suggestions. This page and archived suggestion pages only to be used for the Suggesting and subsequent Voting of these suggestions. If you wish to discuss the suggestion or vote here, please use this page's Talk page (Suggestion talk:20081206 Glowstick). Suggestions do not have to be submitted in order to discuss them. Developing Suggestions can be used to workshop possible suggestions before they are submitted.

Valid Votes Keep, for Suggestions that you believe have merit. Kill, for Suggestions that you believe do not have merit. If you need to discuss a rule fix, use the discussion page. Spam, for the most ridiculous suggestions. Suggestions can be removed with Spam votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks. Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. Dupe, for Suggestions that are exact or very close duplicates of previous suggestions. For a Dupe vote to be valid, a link must be provided to the original suggestion. Dupe votes can be used to remove suggestions as described on the cycling suggestions page. Dupe votes will not be counted when votes are tallied. Humourous, for suggestions that are obviously intended to be satirical, or of comedic value only.}} Suggestions can be removed with Humourous votes as described on the cycling suggestions page. If the criterion described there are not fulfilled, the suggestion must remain for the whole two weeks.

Invalid Votes Server Load and Programming Complexity are NOT very good Kill reasons. You are voting on the merit of the suggestion and whether or not you think it belongs in the game. Server load/complexity issues are up to Kevan to decide. X should be implemented first is not a valid reason for a vote. You are voting on the merit of THIS suggestion, not how it compares to others. Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote.

Comments Re may be used to comment on a vote. Only the original author and the person being REd can comment. Comments are restricted to a single comment per vote, and it is expected that Re comments be as short as possible. Reing every kill vote is considered abuse of the Re comment. A Re does not count as a vote, and any subsequent discussion not part of the Re comment should be held on the discussion page if there is any extended commenting. Note is used by System Operators to invalidate trolling-based votes. Only Sysops may remove troll-based votes and they do so with a strikeout <s></s> in order to preserve the trolling removal for posterity. The voter may contest the strikeout with the Sysop that struck their vote out on the discussion page. Only a System Operator may remove a strikeout.

All Caps Try to avoid YELLING, writing in bold, or using italics, except when emphasizing a point which has escaped other voters.

VOTING EXAMPLES Keep Votes Keep - I am the author and I am allowed to vote once on my own suggestions. --MrSuggester 05:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Best. Suggestion. Evar. --Bob_Zombie 04:01, 11 Nov 2005 (GMT) Keep - Good sugestion. no signature --FakeSuggester 07:39, 15 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill Votes Kill - This is a terrible idea, but you can totally fix it up. --NegativeGal 06:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Please be more specific about how to fix it on the discussion page. --MrSuggester 14:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Re - Sure, I have detailed my proposed fixes here. --NegativeGal 23:38, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Kill - You will eat my poopie and love it! --PooEater 11:12, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Note - Inane vote removed. Defend in discussion. --DaModerator 11:13, 13 Nov 2005 (GMT) Spam/Dupe Votes Spam - Kung Fu CB Mama on Wheels is an inappropriate Survivor Class. --NoFunAtAll 09:01, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT) Dupe - Duplicate Suggestion --AnotherSuggester 05:01, 14 Nov 2005 (GMT)