User talk:Cornholioo

A/VB

When submitting a user for vandalism, you should post on the main page. You accidentally posted on the talk, which is used for discussion of cases by uninvolved parties. But, after reading what's happened, you should go to Arbitration instead, as Arbitration is used for editting disputes.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

A/A

Stop spamming A/A with silly cases please. If you want to "report" someone (as you requested), take them to A/VB. If you want to have something about a user's civility towards you changed, THEN you take it to A/A, but actually express that rather than complain about them swearing. And don't forget to sign, please, it makes a mess of things if not. --

 

 

 

 

06:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I haven't got that much experience with reporting people. Thanks for the tip, I'll stick to it in the future. --Cornholioo 9:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Another request

Due to the subjective nature of groups on this wiki, we tend to not allow unwanted edits to group pages from outsiders of that group. As such, what you've done here is practically vandalism, and would usually be treated as such. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and rather than deal with you officially, I'm going to give you one last warning: don't make unwanted and controversial edits onto other users group pages and/or user pages, especially those of which you are in conflict with in-game or on-wiki. You were already warned for this a week or so ago here, and the sysops of this wiki will most likely get less and less lenient if you keep committing the same offences.

Good luck in the future, and please try and deal with wiki diplomacy according to the rules we try and abide by. If you have any further questions, I'd be more than happy to help you out with them. Thanks, --

 

 

 

 

13:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You missed one, namely here. Which makes three. --zyckde 14:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Am I not allowed to do that? Zyckde has done that too to the page of the NSU here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Union&diff=1668675&oldid=1667344 and here: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=National_Socialist_Union&diff=1670706&oldid=1670105 and I don't believe he was warned for it either.

And I now know I'm not allowed to edit personal pages and I have already apologized for that. I didn't know I wasn't allowed to do that, and I didn't know I'm not allowed to edit other groups' pages as well... I didn't mean to break any rules. --Cornholioo 14:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you should do some research before you.. Oh, wait. You guys don't do that. Right. Infrastructure 15:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh yes we do. I knew he had a case against him. I just didn't knew that was involving the edit he made on the page of the NSU. Also, read the post carefully; it says: "I don't believe he was...", which means I wasn't sure. --Cornholioo 15:16, 25 March 2010.

Recruitment ad

Your Recruitment ad for the National Socialist Union was removed because it lacked a timestamp (if you go to here, you can see that you did sign the ad, but you didn't timestamp it as well...use four tildes instead of three when signing). All ads on that page are required to have timestamps, that way we can keep track of how long they have been posted and can remove them whenever the timestamp has not been updated within the past two months. You are welcome to put the ad back up on the page, so long as you make sure to provide a valid timestamp with it. For your convenience, I've provided your code that I removed.

===[[National Socialist Union]] : National Socialist Survivors===	 
{|	 
|	 
{{:National Socialist Union/recruit}}	 
|}

Cheers. —Aichon— 01:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok, it should be alright now. --Cornholioo 1:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Thanks. —Aichon—

NSU

I may not exactly like you, your organization or your ideology, but that doesn't stop my brain from desperately craving order. Advice: In the group template, your goals no longer appear to be very accurate. Infrastructure 18:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate the clarification. Infrastructure 12:48, 28 March 2010 (BST)

A quick heads up

Look at me being nice for a change. A word of warning, having multiple characters working together in the same group can get you barred from the game thanks to automatic countermeasures. See here for more info. As a rule of thumb make sure you keep your characters more than ten blocks away from each other. thanks. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 16:01, 30 March 2010 (BST)

I already knew. Thanks anyway. --Cornholioo 17:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:35, 30 March 2010 (BST)

The fuck?

Two things, why is a Nazi talking to me, and why would I giveyou my account info?--Sean Connolly 06:55, 6 April 2010 (BST)

If you must know...

My account is the same as my wiki. Sean Connolly. And I don't fear anyone who supports a fascist group that had its military power completely eliminated by Brits and couldn't even keep France in check.--Sean Connolly 03:03, 7 April 2010 (BST)

Advice

This isn't the angry warning/threat of the post I put here last time. I'm just clearing some stuff up in relation to post-removing on your own talk page. Yes, you have every right to remove your posts on your own talk page (as long as you remove the entire thing), so yes, he's wrong and it isn't vandalism. However, he also has almost every right to keep sending messages on your page even though he knows they'll be deleted. So in essence this is just clearing up a few complaints you've both had about each others behaviour on this talk page.

By the way, you can always have a typical arbitration ruling which bars him from contacting you in an informal or derogatory manner. There is an example here. This is a relatively standard thing and rarely "harms" anyone so it's usually a bit more devoid of drama than your recent arbies cases. However, please don't go gun-ho and use individual cases to bar everyone like you've done before, just keep it selective and on the more persisting users. --

 

 

 

 

07:51, 10 April 2010 (BST)

Ok then --Cornholioo 12:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration

Please post your opening statement here, under the heading with your name.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:09, 12 April 2010 (BST)

There's a question on your arbitration page to answer.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:20, 12 April 2010 (BST)

There's a question regarding your permissions on Admin pages to answer.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:31, 12 April 2010 (BST)

I have ruled.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:22, 12 April 2010 (BST)

I would also like your input on the other 2 cases you still have going on. Zou jij mij als arbitrage willen accepteren? Zie A/A --Thadeous Oakley 21:21, 12 April 2010 (BST)

Arbies

Follow Ross' instructions on my talk page, instead of using arbitration.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:20, 13 April 2010 (BST)

Left over arbies sections

Right. In terms of the current arbies cases (the ones started before UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cornholioo vs Misanthropy was concluded) the situation is currently.

• Cornholioo vs Michaleson, Good Grief and Poodle of Doom

Michaleson and poodle of doom have selected arbiters if you wish to proceed

Do you want to proceed with this case? If not I'll cycle it. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 15:15, 16 April 2010 (BST)

• UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot vs Cornholioo

It has been requested that you create what you wish the page to say at User:Cornholioo/krinks_draft in order for a final version of the disputed page to reflect the input of all concerned.

Thanks. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:34, 14 April 2010 (BST)

Working on it. Will be finished later today. --Cornholioo 6:22, 15 April 2010 (BST)

2nd Battle

See this. Infrastructure 17:38, 15 April 2010 (BST)

Check back. --Cornholioo 20:48, 15 April 2010 (BST)

Favoritism! Favoritism!

Why does only my FU buddy get listed as enemy, and not me? I've done the same and PKed you once, what seems to be sufficient to get the one-man-group of his PKer alt listed as an undying nemesis of the NSU. I demand that my one-girl-group Hetzjagd auf Nazis gets immediately recognized as an nemesis as well! --Spiderzed 14:15, 16 April 2010 (BST)

We only list groups over greater than 1 person. --Cornholioo 15:15, 16 April 2010 (BST)

Sir Tintin of Tulips, my fine and prospering group Hetzjagd auf Nazis actually consists now of more then one single alt: Evidence and more evidence. I'll take you by your word. --Spiderzed 15:25, 16 April 2010 (BST)

"groups over greater than 1 person" - what's that in English?--Mallrat ^{TSI TKS CTD} 15:44, 16 April 2010 (BST)

_/XWARNINGX\_

I AM SPARTACUS--Arthur Dent BIN LADEN IS DEAD!!!!! 15:38, 16 April 2010 (BST)