UDWiki:Administration/Sysop Archives/Boxy/2009-11-15 Misconduct

Administration » Sysop Archives » Boxy » 2009-11-15 Misconduct

15 November 2009

Refusing to strike my warning despite being active on the wiki and fully aware i am due a striking. I will only accept iscariot as arbitrator. xoxo 09:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

But seriously this case is serious. xoxo 09:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

It only becomes serious if I try to escalate you without taking the situation into consideration -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:21 15 November 2009 (BST)

Not Misconduct - Congratulations, he never explicitly stated he wasn't going to strike you, and you gave him a grand total of 4 minutes before putting the case up. Ask someone else before jumping to the podium. And the very fact you threatened him with an A/M case doesn't make the case itself any more legitimate, and will most likely follow with an A/VB case of your own if this is ruled Not Misconduct. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

cool story. But hey,it looks like this case at least got me the strike i've been requesting for some time. So maybe the system does work... xoxo 09:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

And you'll be receiving an escalation within the day if I have anything to do with it. See what happens when you wait more than 15 minutes before jumping into a case? --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

You went out of your way to be obnoxious about me jumping to do your bidding, despite me being involved elsewhere on the wiki. There is no requirement for sysops to deescalate someone within minutes of such a demand. You know that. Just as long as it's done in good time, and before considering a further escalation... which it looks like you're trying to earn ASAP -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 09:36 15 November 2009 (BST)

No actually i put in a request days ago and i had made over 250 edits since my last act of vandalism. I come back on the wiki and theres been a shitstorm of drama but magically no striking (well there was one, but it was gone). I was understandably irritated and wanted to make sure that the striking was done whilst i was active on the wiki this time, so i could make sure no shenanigans got in the way of justice being served. xoxo 09:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

You had made 247, actually. 247 =/= striking. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 09:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

"from a user's last infraction". See below case. And you can't cry precedent on the case on me because that case didn't exist when i requested striking. xoxo 10:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Erm, what? Irony much? The case below is not misconduct and therefore by means of precedent the "from a user's last infraction" principle has stayed firmly in the idea that the timer starts on the warning not the physical act of vandalism. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 10:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Not Misconduct - shut the fuck up jed Cyberbob  Talk  10:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Not Misconduct indeed --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Misconduct. Demote the cunt.-- SA 15:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

its catching on :D--CyberRead240 07:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I'm just going to over use it until no one wants to use it ever again. :P -- SA 16:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

'''Cismonduct''' - Cemote the dunt. Lelouch vi Britannia is helping make Ridleybank green_ and gives Achievements 17:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Not Misconduct - Cheese 16:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Closed as Not Misconduct. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 02:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)