UDWiki:Historical Group/Voting/Soldiers of Crossman

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

ATTENTION! No new nominations are allowed.
The sysop team will start processing the current nominations through the rest of the day.
If a group or event is not promoted to historical status by the time the wiki becomes read-only on the 14th, its bid has failed.
-- The Sysop Team

Historical Groups » Voting

Soldiers of Crossman

Being able to track their history to the '05 era beginning with their parent groups, Liberation of Crossman Department and Crossman Defense Force, the Soldiers of Crossman have been a staple group of not only the NW but Malton as a whole through their bonds built with fellow survivors. Can count long time Zambah group such as FRF, MOB, and OG Dead as our favored enemies.

Never falling off the stats page for more than a few refreshes, their openness to adjusting tactics and taking on the reddest of suburbs helped in keeping them active right up until the servers crapped out. The city broke before the SoC did!

Today, Tomorrow Forever!

Yes

  1. Author. Clayton Carmine (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. Yes, Of course. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matahashi (talk • contribs) 20:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC).
  3. SoC might never have had the sheer size of DEM or Fortress, but they had an overproportional impact on the NW and were well-liked across the meta. -- Spiderzed▋ 20:09, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. The SoC always struck a nice balance. Despite the expectations placed on any group in the vicinity of Caiger, they eschewed trenchy sieges in favor of more effective tactics, allowing them to punch well above their weight. But they also knew how to keep things fun for their members, hence why they were present at nearly every well-run event of the last 15 years and remained a presence on the stats page until the end. Perhaps most importantly, they appreciated that the game was a bit too easy for survivors and knew which buttons they could push to elicit a response when things began to feel stale. —Aichon— 21:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. SOC Forever. --RWSig1.png RWSig2.pngFoD PK Praise Rando!21:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. Yes! Tarkenton 22:07, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Yes please Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 22:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  8. *SIGH* Go on then. --LordMoloch (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
  9. Yes --Dijon Sanders Talk 03:19, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  10. Sons of Ches... oh, wait, the other SoC. Of course! RogueRisker (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  11. Yes. --Wayson (talk) 05:48, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  12. Yes stelar Talk|MCM|EBD|Scourge 09:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  13. No doubt Graan Zanz 09:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  14. Yes! They played the game the right way —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anti-Zergz (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC).
  15. Yep. --hagnat 19:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  16. Yes. ~ AphelionT 20:12, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  17. Yes. JaneZoe (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  18. Yes. It's absolutely crazy to see something I created in 2005 survive until now. --DarthRevan (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  19. Yes Gazstar (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  20. Yes - In addition to their many accomplishments, they could always be counted on to show up for major sieges and played an integral part Fiffy (talk) 05:35, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  21. Yes --SweetIrony (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  22. Yes - Any group that manages to survive approx. 20 years in one form or another did something right. Beyond that, SoC basically participated in every major combat situation, be it the original Caiger siege, the Survivor Zone, countless other historical events. Basically a staple within the North-West. “Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Godspeed. --Johnny Rico (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  23. Yes. Frank Burn (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  24. Yes. Some of the best friends, allies and food I've encountered over the years. PB&J 18:16, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  25. Yes SIllylIlypIly (talk) 19:33, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

No

  1. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = SPITE —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DEADGAY (talk • contribs) 10:27, 12 March 2025.
  2. Spite. --【ⅎooɹd ǝʌɐɥ ᴉ sʇɐoƃ sʍoʅʚ ⅎǝᴉɹɔuoɯ uǝɹɐʞ】 ☉ We're going to destroy everything, and you can't stop us ☉ You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 05:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. No. Bunch of worthless trenchcoaters who never climbed above four players. Flesnolk (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. Who? --Ocular You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 02:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  5. Appreciate the years of winning territory wars against them, but no. --Starlingt (talk) 09:41, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  6. VOTE TYPE = NO; REASON = WHO? Shigogouhou (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
  7. Probably zergs. No. --mewse You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild!|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 14:27, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Historical_Group/Voting/Soldiers_of_Crossman&oldid=2450270"