User talk:Zyckde

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Zyckde reserves the right to remove absolutely ANYTHING off his talk page.


WWSISgreen.jpg

Old talk can be found here and discussions about the various changes can take place at the bottom of this page.

Project Dentonside

Location Page Building Toolkit

Lots of pre uploaded Images, that may be of help. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 09:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Project Dentonside Discussion

hey Zyckde, great work on dentonside. Heres a list of all the pages in the area that currently have some kind of backstory. Might help you come up with coherent themes or new ideas. Theres still about 90 blocks with no details at all. Good work. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I am will try to work on the list. --Zyckde 21:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Discussions/comments on fascism in malton

Bash the Fash

Nonetheless, I'm contacting other groups in that suburb and non-Nazi german groups to make sure he can't find anything but barren ground to plant his hateful seed. --Fenian 15:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Anti-Semite

Wow, it's indeed escalating.. I do, honestly, have no idea how this should be handled, though. I'm lousy at this kind of thing. I don't know if there's actually any rules about personal attacks/things like this, but there should be. Infrastructure 14:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

About the Nazis...

Yeah, I've killed abot 12 of them so far. Racist bastards. You figure they'd be smart enough to leave a building after screaming the N word.--Sean Connolly 01:17, 1 April 2010 (BST)

NSU

I and a few other Ferals are considering to pay a "visit" to those creeps, but have no trace since the Battle of Krinks. I've noticed that you've kept track of the place of residence of that group after that event. Any idea where they might hide out now? --Spiderzed 11:52, 1 April 2010 (BST)

As we are zambahz, I dunno if you'd be happy if we just stay in the general area and bust safehouses at random ;-) Seems like some of us will have to bite a needle and go on a free-running beat patrol themselves. But thanks anyway. --Spiderzed 12:47, 1 April 2010 (BST)

Cornhoolioo's corner where he can provoke zyckde

27.18 MHz: *crash* *static* *silence* (7 hours and 25 minutes ago) hihihihi! *giggle* --Cornholioo 12:52, 14 April 2010 (BST)

First Batavian Warrior attacks Krinks. Following that you make a zerg move with cornhoolio. You admit to zerging. And now you top it off by attacking with Batavian Warrior again. Ahwell, that's your choice entirely. --zyckde 15:49, 14 April 2010 (BST)
@Zyckde, I would remind you to not feed the troll, and do not worry too much about him zerging, people are aware and actions have been put into motion. I saw the stuff you posted over at resens, nice try. The time indication on your computer puts Cornholioo technically in the right, as their is more then 24 hours between the time of person A and then person B. If you want to talk things over a little more about how to spot zergs and such, stop by a forum and PM me in private. I am on Resens, Brainstock and The Streltsy, or you can even stop by Good Grief and I can show you a few things to look for and such. In the mean time I remind you not to feed the troll. -- Emot-argh.gif 17:45, 14 April 2010 (BST)
Sorry guys I wasn't listening. I was listening to LURCS Radio. It said this: "27.18 MHz: *crash* *static* *silence* (2 minutes ago)". Can you please repeat yourself? --Cornholioo 15:11, 15 April 2010. I am so nice.
Zerger say what? -- 01:38, 16 April 2010 (BST)
idk. This is zerger talk you see. Zyckde and me, both zergers. You can't understand. --Cornholioo 7:47, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Oh I'm sorry. Some hyprocritical Jew that reported me wasn't able to get me on the black list. It seems like what I done wasn't considered 'zerging'. Then you're just inable to read. --Cornholioo 7:49, 17 April 2010 (BST).
.. Here exactly did you see that? Infrastructure 15:05, 17 April 2010 (BST)
People, chill out. This is the corner where cornhoolio can provoke ME, not infrastructure, DDR, or Colonel. As a wise person/Jew once said: "Stop feeding the troll". --zyckde 21:15, 17 April 2010 (BST)
"You fire your pistol at Tony Oidar for 5 damage. Their flak jacket absorbs 1 point of that damage. They die."
Chapeau. --Cornholioo 21:01, 18 April 2010 (BST)

Edit war

What would you say if I as the leader of "Hetzjagd auf Nazis" would volunteer to be put up as the so-called leader of the so-called coalition in BoK2? It would end the edit war (as the "coalition" has offcially decided on an official leader for this matter, so any further edits by Corny ignoring that fact would be vandalism), would get you out of the drama, and would allow me to ditch Cornys miserly radio smashing business from the article in favour of a look on the casualties. --Spiderzed 21:34, 17 April 2010 (BST)

They wouldn't be vandalism. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 21:37, 17 April 2010 (BST)
A shame. Well, it might yet be worth a try for the other reasons. (And it would somehow make sense, as we've actually shot someone and have done so somthing that looks like Battle, while WWSIS has just repaired the equipment damage and moved on like their was no threat, which frankly never has been there.) --Spiderzed 21:51, 17 April 2010 (BST)
It's still a sound plan, to have a fact that can be defended and not just a case of edit warring. I say go for it. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 21:52, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Sounds like a plan. I agree.--zyckde 22:54, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Enjoy :-) As soon as I feel like it I will also write an "offcial" closing statement by HaN... --Spiderzed 23:07, 17 April 2010 (BST)
Have been in a snarky mood today, so here I have something prepared. Can we agree on this as the agreed upon POV of the so-called coalition, before I edit it in? (Just to have some claim of validity, as with my "leadership" charade.) --Spiderzed 00:41, 18 April 2010 (BST)
Your leadership seems undisputed :-) Stylistically it might be good to minimize the quoting of the various actors.
The coalition never "declared" war, nor did it agree to peace in the "First Battle". That was all on cornhoolio's initiative. However, it is true he stopped hostilities after a certain point. Violence from his side flared up after the The Topleaf Victory: here. I think that is the point where he radicalized his strategy: he created an army of zergs, played as a zed attacking krinks (while his group states they are pro-survivor), and started to GK, RK. This he called the second battle of Krinks. --zyckde 08:26, 18 April 2010 (BST)
I overhauled it a bit now, especially the bit about the single-sided war declaration, and the non-recognition as a war.
I sticked with the many quotes, mainly a.) as they have been mostly put up by Corny and I want to limit any potential edit war to those points that are worth it (rather then purely aesthetical ones), and b.) as they allow me to poke fun at his pathetic "battle" and yet keep the article NPOV (as they are just POV quotes from one side of the "battle", something he can hardly keep forbidden in a formal edit war solution (Arbies etc.) without having his bits removed as well).
I also didn't put in the zombie attack bit, mainly because a.) I have no evidence like screenshots, b.) it can be easily subsumed under RKing/GKing and c.) even a brief look at the NSU alts shows that they must be terribly ineffective zombies, given their skills alone. --Spiderzed 12:28, 18 April 2010 (BST)
Given that you meanwhile had time to look yourself into and edit the 2BoK article and talk page, do you agree with the draft now being ready to go online? --Spiderzed 17:13, 18 April 2010 (BST)
I read it, and like it, although to my taste it i still on the long side, but I just say that cause I am not fond of big pieces of text. So, I think you did a nice job, and agree that it should go "online". --zyckde 17:18, 18 April 2010 (BST)

Remember, the page will probably be moved to Corny's namespace soon. Infrastructure 17:27, 18 April 2010 (BST)

Here you go. Look as long as Corny hasn't deleted it :D And Infrastructure, I'm aware that either Iscariots arbie, the deletion discussion or a combination of both will likely kick the article from the main namespace. But as long as it stands, I don't see why we can't make it more factual (and disrupt Cornys one-man shilling spree a bit). --Spiderzed 17:49, 18 April 2010 (BST)
As long as it annoys him. Infrastructure 17:51, 18 April 2010 (BST)

Re: This

The aforementioned page is in the main namespace, and as such, can be freely edited by anyone. This means that Cornholioo is free to put any and all information he wishes onto the page, though you are free to remove any and all information also. However, the resulting edit war this is likely to produce would be better avoided by settling the matter another way, perhaps through Arbitration. However, it is highly likely that the page will soon be moved to Cornholioo's namespace, which will make it entirely his own property, pending the results on A/D. Until then I would ask that the page be left alone, and should it be decided that it is to remain in the main namespace, only then you should take action if you wish to limit the information presented on the page. For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 15:11, 16 April 2010 (BST)