Suggestion:20080210 Number Groups v2

	Multiple Suggestion
	This suggestion has been removed from voting because each user is only allowed to submit one suggestion per day (i.e. in a 24 hour period beginning at 00:01 BST). The suggestion may be resubmitted after that time, but it is recommended that it be placed on Developing Suggestions first, to gauge community support, and to improve it before being taken to voting.

20080210 Number Groups v2

Hhal 21:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Stats page change.

Suggestion scope
Everyone.

Suggestion description
Put simply, all I'm proposing is to number the list of groups. Here's an example of how it might look:

As you can see, there is nothing special about this. This is not giving the groups any special rankings. This does not change how the groups are arranged in any way. All it does is number all the groups on the list.

I ask you now to please READ MY FUCKING SUGGESTION and don't just skim it and make up some bullshit excuse of a vote.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

1. Author Keep - The rules state if the suggestion is removed for revision, you can put it back in at any time. --Hhal 21:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
   • I would like to remind the Spam voters of the voting rules: Spam votes are not a "strong kill", they are simply here to prevent the utterly ridiculous from clogging up the system. If you do not like the idea, and it's not some crazy uber power or something else ridiculous, VOTE KILL, NOT SPAM. Spam votes will be counted as Kill when votes are tallied. --Hhal 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2. Keep - Bit aggressive though.... --Seventythree^Talk 21:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
   • I apologize for that, it just makes me mad when people vote on suggestions after reading two lines of it. --Hhal 21:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
     • That's why you gotta make the first two lines the best. Sucks, but there you go.--Seventythree^Talk 21:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
3. Keep - Simple, yet rather useful in a way. Saves counting so much. -- Cheese 21:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
4. Keep - I always take ages trying to find my groups rank and you always lose count and have to restart. good idea. -- tom1504 21:58 10th February 2008
5. Keep - no reason why not. Don't shout, though. I felt like making up a bullshit Spam vote just to fuck you off. --Funt Solo ^QT 22:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
6. Keep - I'd love to know what number my group was. --FXI 23:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
7. Keep - =D --BoboTalkClown 23:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
8. Kepp - Really now, there are some numbers. Someone wants to know how big their group is compared to the others, why not? It's already numbered anyway. Not to mention numbering really takes a load off of one's eyes. -- Quizzical  Quiz  Speak  23:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
9. Keep - as all above--Corndoghero^T-S-Z 00:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Kill Votes

1. Kill - I still say it's prettier without the numbers. --Ms.Panes 22:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - Don't resuggest things multiple times simply to get rid of all the votes against. Numbering the list can do nothing but rank groups, it's not needed for any reason other than that bragging.--Karek^maps?! 23:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
   • I did not resuggest this to get rid of the against votes. In case you're blind or something, my other one was REMOVED. I included the edits I made in that version in this one. --Hhal 23:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
     • The only difference between this one and that one is the votes. That one got removed because you decided to edit it after the fact, that's your fault, doesn't excuse resuggesting it. Suggestion:20080210_Number_Groups < The old version which is exactly the same as this one.--Karek^maps?! 23:30, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
       • {{{1}}} Non Author RE and comment.--Karek^maps?! 00:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
2. There's no telling how many groups may appear on that list. And Funt beated me to that strikeout above...Damn. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
   • Uhh...yes you can tell how many will appear. Didn't you read my suggestion? I didn't say I wanted to make a new list, I said I wanted to NUMBER the current list. --Hhal 00:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
3. Spam - Still ranking. Still sucking.--The Hierophant 00:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
4. Spam - Unneeded. Learn to count, rather than expecting the intertron to do it for you. -- Iscariot 00:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
   • Ok smartass, let's see YOU go and count all the groups on that list, without losing count once. --Hhal 00:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
5. Spam - Suggestion rule 9. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 01:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
   • "This limit does not include suggestions which the author has removed for the purpose of revision." --Hhal 01:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
     • This wasn't removed for revision, it was removed due to you editing it. And not this has been removed as a {{Multi}}.--Karek^maps?! 01:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)