UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Simple new policy, simple new change)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Policy Document|Reevaluation for Bureaucrats}} {{protect}}
{{notice|Due to [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|a more recent policy change]], terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.}}
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.


:{{divquote||If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.}}
:{{divquote||If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.}}
New Text would be
::{{divquote||If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after '''8''' months, then an election is called after that period.}}
==Voting Section==
{{PolicyVotingRules}}
===For===
#'''Author Vote''' - This just makes sense. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --<small>Oh, and vote on [[UDWiki:Projects/Very_Funny...or_Not|Project Funny]], by the way.</small> --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#Makes sense. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - Fair enough.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
#Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations.  Clearly. Yes. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#:<sub>[[Mod Conspiracy]]</sub>. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - As [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats|discussed on the talk page]]. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - Agree - [[User:Louis_Vernon|<span style="color: red">'''Louis Vernon'''</span>]] <span style="color:red">11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)</span>
#'''FORE!'''--&nbsp;[[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|link=User:Sexualharrison| HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS! | 16px]] &nbsp; <small> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">bitch</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</small><small>16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)</small>
# Makes better sense. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
# meh --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
# Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]] 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
#:<s>'''For''' --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 15:08, 30 May 2011 (BST)</s> <small>Vote after deathline struck --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 17:14, 30 May 2011 (BST)</small>
===Against===
:<s>incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will ''replace'' the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)</s>
::That is actually already in the [[A/RE]] policy itself as documented on the talk page. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
:::Right you are. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)

Latest revision as of 17:20, 30 November 2015

Green check.png Guidelines — Policy Document
This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes.
Padlock.png Administration Services — Protection.
This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.
Notice
Due to a more recent policy change, terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.

This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.


New Text would be

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  2. Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  3. Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  4. For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  5. For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  6. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
  7. Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations. Clearly. Yes. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
    Mod Conspiracy. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  8. For - As discussed on the talk page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  9. For - Agree - Louis Vernon 11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)
  10. FORE!-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch  16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)
  11. Makes better sense. Aichon 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  12. meh --hagnat 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  13. Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --Rosslessness 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
    For --Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:08, 30 May 2011 (BST) Vote after deathline struck -- Spiderzed 17:14, 30 May 2011 (BST)

Against

incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)
That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)