UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Policy Document|Reevaluation for Bureaucrats}} {{protect}}
{{notice|Due to [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|a more recent policy change]], terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.}}
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.


Line 12: Line 14:
#'''Author Vote''' - This just makes sense. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#'''Author Vote''' - This just makes sense. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --<small>Oh, and vote on [[UDWiki:Projects/Very_Funny...or_Not|Project Funny]], by the way.</small> --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --<small>Oh, and vote on [[UDWiki:Projects/Very_Funny...or_Not|Project Funny]], by the way.</small> --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#Makes sense. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - Fair enough.--[[User:Yonnua Koponen|<span style="color: DarkOrange">Yonnua Koponen</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Yonnua Koponen| <span style="color:Gold">T</span>]][[DvB| <span style="color: Goldenrod">G</span>]]</sup><sup><span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=840689 <span style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> P</span>] </span></sup> [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Sandbox|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[Discosaurs|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]][[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#Donkey|<span style="color: Red">^</span>]] 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
#-- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
#Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations.  Clearly. Yes. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#:<sub>[[Mod Conspiracy]]</sub>. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - As [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats|discussed on the talk page]]. --{{User:Akule/sig}} 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
#'''For''' - Agree - [[User:Louis_Vernon|<span style="color: red">'''Louis Vernon'''</span>]] <span style="color:red">11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)</span>
#'''FORE!'''--&nbsp;[[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|link=User:Sexualharrison| HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS! | 16px]] &nbsp; <small> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">bitch</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;</small><small>16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)</small>
# Makes better sense. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
# meh --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
# Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]] 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
#:<s>'''For''' --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 15:08, 30 May 2011 (BST)</s> <small>Vote after deathline struck --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 17:14, 30 May 2011 (BST)</small>


===Against===
===Against===
:<s>incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will ''replace'' the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)</s>
::That is actually already in the [[A/RE]] policy itself as documented on the talk page. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
:::Right you are. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)

Latest revision as of 17:20, 30 November 2015

Green check.png Guidelines — Policy Document
This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes.
Padlock.png Administration Services — Protection.
This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log.
Notice
Due to a more recent policy change, terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.

This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period.


New Text would be

said:
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period.

Voting Section

Voting Rules
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
  • # comments ~~~~
    or
  • # ~~~~

Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

For

  1. Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  2. Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  3. Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  4. For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? For hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  5. For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
  6. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
  7. Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations. Clearly. Yes. --Funt Solo QT Scotland flag.JPG 23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
    Mod Conspiracy. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  8. For - As discussed on the talk page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
  9. For - Agree - Louis Vernon 11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)
  10. FORE!-- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch  16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc)
  11. Makes better sense. —Aichon— 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  12. meh --hagnat 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
  13. Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --Rosslessness 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
    For --Michalesonbadge.pngTCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:08, 30 May 2011 (BST) Vote after deathline struck -- Spiderzed█ 17:14, 30 May 2011 (BST)

Against

incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)
That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Reevaluation_for_Bureaucrats&oldid=2272561"