UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bob Moncrief (talk | contribs) (notice: voided by newer policy) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Policy Document|Reevaluation for Bureaucrats}} {{protect}} | {{Policy Document|Reevaluation for Bureaucrats}} {{protect}} | ||
{{notice|Due to | {{notice|Due to [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Re-Evaluating Re-Evaluations and Other Sysopness|a more recent policy change]], terms have been further reduced to 6 months, making this policy effectively void.}} | ||
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle. | This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 30 November 2015
|
Guidelines — Policy Document This page is a statement of official UDWiki Policies and Rules. See Policy Discussion for policy additions and changes. |
|
Administration Services — Protection. This page has been protected against editing. See the archive of recent actions or the Protections log. |
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period. |
New Text would be
| said: |
| If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period. |
Voting Section
| Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
| The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same?
19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST) - For - Fair enough.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:03, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
- Clearly part of Karke's plan for eventual domination of the wiki through seemingly innocent policy alterations. Clearly. Yes. --Funt Solo QT
23:49, 17 May 2011 (BST)
- Mod Conspiracy. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
- For - As discussed on the talk page. --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 23:58, 17 May 2011 (BST)
- For - Agree - Louis Vernon 11:08 18 May 2011 (BST)
- FORE!--
bitch 16:04, 18 May 2011 (utc) - Makes better sense. —Aichon— 08:51, 24 May 2011 (BST)
- meh --hagnat 17:05, 24 May 2011 (BST)
- Frankly Crats just generally offend me. Oh and down with cats. --Rosslessness 20:00, 26 May 2011 (BST)
Against
incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)- That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Right you are. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 02:44, 14 May 2011 (BST)
- That is actually already in the A/RE policy itself as documented on the talk page. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 21:17, 13 May 2011 (BST)
