User talk:Suicidalangel: Difference between revisions
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) (For next time) |
|||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
Thanks for breaking my page when I look at it from a different computer Bob. But yeah, if you didn't notice from the Not Vandalims rulings, we don't think he did anyhting wrong from the start.--BFFs [[User:Suicidalangel|'''+SA+''']][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]] 4 EVA!!! 16:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | Thanks for breaking my page when I look at it from a different computer Bob. But yeah, if you didn't notice from the Not Vandalims rulings, we don't think he did anyhting wrong from the start.--BFFs [[User:Suicidalangel|'''+SA+''']][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]][[User:Suicidalangel|SA]][[User:Nubis|N]] 4 EVA!!! 16:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you for your input. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 16:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | :Thank you for your input. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 16:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== For next time == | |||
=) Thought you might find [[UDWiki:Administration/Discussion#Monumental_Fuck_up_Workarounds|this]] useful. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:26, 8 February 2009
OBEY OR BE BEATEN! WHICH MEANS NO ACRONYMS OR LEET SPEAK! Also, please use the level two heading and put your post at the top. Thanks.
ElectionsWill you be standing for the upcoming 'crat elections? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 03:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I forgot to thank youFor this edit. Thanks :D. (Seriously though, I thought I did this days ago. Sorry :(.) Linkthewindow Talk 14:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
UraniumBOMBS--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 02:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
A point on faithwikipedia:Bad_faith. The point? Intentionally abusing policy is always in bad faith. For some reason people always seem to not realize that when ruling on certain users cases. If he was intentionally trying to abuse a loophole in a policy the existence of the loophole does mean he wasn't breaking any rules according to the words but that he was breaking the purpose of the policy, that he knows as much means that the edit is in bad faith and that it's in bad faith means it does in fact qualify for punishment under our vandalism policy.--Karekmaps?! 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) ThanksI'll test it on my ye olde monitor later. Damn, that piece of code was so obvious >:(. Linkthewindow Talk 00:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC) RE:PARTY!!!
SysopnessCongratulations! You are now a sysop. =) After almost unanimous support, there's not really any other outcome. =p Anyway, good luck and try not to break anything. Enjoy! -- Cheese 11:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to the cool guys club. And link, ur next. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 12:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Hah! Now do some work. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC) You look funny when you delete stuff. Also, what is your opinion on this template? -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Congrats. You may now begin screening potential Arbiters for when Iscariot gets a wild hair. Conndrakamod TAZM CFT 22:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Cheers!--Janus talk 13:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC) SigPerhaps I'm wrong, but don't you have to keep a link to your page in your signature? (Sorry if you have one and I'm just being dense, but your sig on the sandbox doesn't look like you have one). --Pestolence(talk) 18:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Satisfy my curiosityYou always lived in the US?--Thadeous Oakley 21:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Very fast response: Fail or Win? I was just wondering if it was coincidence that your in-game character is named Engel while you call yourself suicidalangel. You see, your name is suicidalangel. "Engel" is the direct Dutch translation of the word "Angel".--Thadeous Oakley 21:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC) Aber ich spreche keine Deutsch. I dropped German two years ago, the grammar was too hard :P. I knew it wasn't coincidence!--Thadeous Oakley 10:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Errrrr*ticI dunno really, it was just a vague feeling I had at the time. Actually reading your bid got rid of it. --Cyberbob 21:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Your thoughtson this? Also i'm adding you to UHUB.--xoxo 00:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Code StealersThat's too bad. Looked like a hilarious group. -- CITIZEN VI 03:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Hi againMeanie. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 15:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
:D I think I'm going to read your bid now, since I pounced on it fairly quickly. Rawr. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC) LOL (Yes that's an acronym son)I would have lol'd at this there, but I've been banned from his page :'(. So, lol here. Also, your talk page confuses me... --Pestolence(talk) 21:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Trying to find my way around the empty/confusing talk pageSo I can say thanks =] Liberty 12:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Postin on ur talk pageAmidoinitrite? --ZsL 12:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Hahaha! We made you remove the rules of your talk page, due to our inability/indifference to post properly! --ZsL 01:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Thank YouFor the unofficial warn, it won't happen again :D. --Leroy jankens 21:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Dear SuicidalAngel,Can I have my spider back then please.--Lexicality 23:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Assylumcould you add a few NPOV explanation of what was Assylum and who was part of it ? And list it on Category:Wiki Groups --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 11:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Team Angel SigsIt should totally be something along the lines of BFFs NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSA etc. 4 EVA. Well, that sig for at least a week.--– Nubis NWO 09:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm changing that signature back to the last available version, SA. I had to go to the page history to work out if it was you or nubis that was signing on the promotions page. Tell me why I shouldn't take you to vandalism for deliberately breaking the sig policy to make some kind of bullshit point? -- boxy talk • teh rulz 23:41 5 February 2009 (BST)
Well, y'all successfully confuzzled at least one person... :) --Jen 03:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Will we still be BFFs if this goes south on me? --– Nubis NWO 03:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Look,i don't give a shite what sig you have but this is stupid, read got a week ban for far less. I know you didn't think he should have but the clear bias from boxy and the like isn't okay. Please change your sig, or convince them to strike reads ban and have whoever banned him do the time from a/m. Sorry to be such a fun sponge...--xoxo 04:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for breaking my page when I look at it from a different computer Bob. But yeah, if you didn't notice from the Not Vandalims rulings, we don't think he did anyhting wrong from the start.--BFFs +SA+NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN 4 EVA!!! 16:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
For next time=) Thought you might find this useful. -- Cheese 15:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |