Talk:Discosaurs/Rage in the Age: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Michaleson (talk | contribs) |
(→Query) |
||
Line 329: | Line 329: | ||
::::::It was 1 per 3 days, I checked. Frankly, I'm not bothered either way, and now that we have a point, I'm reluctant to lose it.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 19:09, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ::::::It was 1 per 3 days, I checked. Frankly, I'm not bothered either way, and now that we have a point, I'm reluctant to lose it.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 19:09, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ||
::::::: Am I meant to update it myself?--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 19:15, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ::::::: Am I meant to update it myself?--{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 19:15, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ||
::::::::The front page one, not the talk page one. The talk one is more meant to be for which group everyone is in.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 19:33, 3 October 2010 (BST) | |||
Quick unrelated notion. Make the scoreboard an actual scoreboard: rank the groups on actual points rather than alphabetically. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:38, 3 October 2010 (BST) | Quick unrelated notion. Make the scoreboard an actual scoreboard: rank the groups on actual points rather than alphabetically. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:38, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ||
Line 334: | Line 335: | ||
::lolirdumb --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:55, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ::lolirdumb --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 18:55, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ||
:::Back on the subject of the latecomer, I'm sorry but I can't agree with this either. I'm really not making a big deal about the name tag thing but this would be the second time the rules were ''bent'' and the event isn't even 24 hours old. But like Bosch said, everyone has had weeks to decide if they wanted to participate in this. This person can always join the next event and that'll be fair on everyone playing in this manhunt. [[User:Petite Fille|Petite Fille]] 19:25, 3 October 2010 (BST) | :::Back on the subject of the latecomer, I'm sorry but I can't agree with this either. I'm really not making a big deal about the name tag thing but this would be the second time the rules were ''bent'' and the event isn't even 24 hours old. But like Bosch said, everyone has had weeks to decide if they wanted to participate in this. This person can always join the next event and that'll be fair on everyone playing in this manhunt. [[User:Petite Fille|Petite Fille]] 19:25, 3 October 2010 (BST) | ||
::::Yeah, it's cool, I've already told them they can't participate. But the group name thing was never really part of the rules. It was more to help the RG not think we were PKers (which most of us are).--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 19:33, 3 October 2010 (BST) |
Revision as of 18:33, 3 October 2010
Archived conversations made before the start of RITA are located at the archive. A write-up of the event can be found here.
Kills
Kills go below here.
- First blood to RDD. 01:08, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Seconds before Natasha and the rest of the allstars declared war on the Discosaurs.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:12, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Axe gets Timmy --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:14, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Kempy gets Bravo --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:14, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Tash gets Funkiraptor --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:14, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Zipo gets Noir Although first blood goes to RDD, 2nd, 3rd, 4th,
and5th, and 6th blood goes to the allstars. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 01:18, 3 October 2010 (BST)- I'm still proud of my daring escape from one of the most horrific massacres in Manhunt history.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:20, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I stand corrected.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:21, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Oh SNAP! ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 01:24, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I stand corrected.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:21, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm still proud of my daring escape from one of the most horrific massacres in Manhunt history.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:20, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Tash kills Rexy --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:23, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Nothing Like Getting Killed, revived and claiming two victims in the same ten minutes. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 01:25, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Right, I need to go to sleep. Can people update the front page on their own? I'll do the talk page table, seeing as that's really for my reference.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:29, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Nothing Like Getting Killed, revived and claiming two victims in the same ten minutes. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 01:25, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- WU TANG AINT NOTHIN 2 FUK WIT -- LEMON #1 01:55, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- The event should just end like right now. I mean, let's face it. The All-Stars are pwning everyone, and very early in the game too. ;D --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:59, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Well, crud! We were sure this thing started tomorrow night. Over here, it's still October 2. But hang on.... everyone will be awake shortly and then we'll see who does the major pwnage regardless of who drew first blood. ;) Petite Fille 04:03, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- The event should just end like right now. I mean, let's face it. The All-Stars are pwning everyone, and very early in the game too. ;D --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:59, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Baron gets Bravo --schweinhund 03:06, 3 October 2010 (GMT)
- Quick question, is everyone supposed to have their group in their profile because some don't or have an incorrect one listed. --schweinhund 04:00, 3 October 2010 (GMT)
- Well, everyone was originally suppose to list their group so to not cause confusion with the folks at RG, but I've submited the below list to them already, so I think it's safe to say, we don't necessarily need to list it now. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:07, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Seeing how certain groups (MHAS and DS in particular) are made up of mis-match members of other groups, we shouldn't force them to change group tags.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:01, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- It makes no difference to me whether the others are wearing the same tag or not since the other teams are contact-listed now but I'd like to point out that we're also made up of mismatched members too. Out of a seven member team, we were wearing five different group tags before this manhunt began. However, if I'd known this deal about group tags wouldn't be a rule-breaker sooner, I never would have dropped my Feral Undead tag. This is the first time I've not worn my FU tag since I put it on in May, 2007, and I feel a little naked without it. But hey, it's only for two weeks, right? Petite Fille 12:57, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Pop the tag in your profile somewhere, the rules don't state it has to be in the Group section. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 12:58, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I didn't mention you guys because you're all wearing the right tags. :p But seriously, we have a list, so wear whatever.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:59, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- It makes no difference to me whether the others are wearing the same tag or not since the other teams are contact-listed now but I'd like to point out that we're also made up of mismatched members too. Out of a seven member team, we were wearing five different group tags before this manhunt began. However, if I'd known this deal about group tags wouldn't be a rule-breaker sooner, I never would have dropped my Feral Undead tag. This is the first time I've not worn my FU tag since I put it on in May, 2007, and I feel a little naked without it. But hey, it's only for two weeks, right? Petite Fille 12:57, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Seeing how certain groups (MHAS and DS in particular) are made up of mis-match members of other groups, we shouldn't force them to change group tags.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:01, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Well, everyone was originally suppose to list their group so to not cause confusion with the folks at RG, but I've submited the below list to them already, so I think it's safe to say, we don't necessarily need to list it now. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:07, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Quick question, is everyone supposed to have their group in their profile because some don't or have an incorrect one listed. --schweinhund 04:00, 3 October 2010 (GMT)
- Darma gives disco a +1 Kill--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:06, 3 October 2010 (BST)
THE GAMES HAVE BEGUN --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 01:00, 3 October 2010 (BST)
Manhunt Participants (for reference)
Query
Just recieved a message abotu somebody trying to join DS. Shall we use the AHMH policy of people joining late acting as -1 kill for every 3 days late you are? Or shall we ban new members? Everybody register opinions now!--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 16:29, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Late = -1, which will of course damage your overall group score. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:33, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- If it was one of your already named members who's just turning up late, then it's ok far as I'm concerned. If not, and it's someone new wishing to join, then yeah, -1. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 16:57, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Yeah, it's somebody new. The above team members may well disappear from the list.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:16, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm not really in favour... When we let Natasha into the third Malton Manhunt, it was like... an hour late. Fair enough, we said, and no-more. But this contest has properly started nearly 18 hours ago and it's bending the rules somewhat out of shape to let them in now. Also, the prescribed penalty is barely a scratch in this 'team' game. Personally, I think we should say no, sorry to whoever it is that wants in, but people have had weeks to prepare... --BOSCH 18:23, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- If I recall, the penalty was -1 for every 5 hours in AHMH3. Or something like that. I don't fully recall what I came up with. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:49, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- It was 1 per 3 days, I checked. Frankly, I'm not bothered either way, and now that we have a point, I'm reluctant to lose it.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:09, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Am I meant to update it myself?--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:15, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- The front page one, not the talk page one. The talk one is more meant to be for which group everyone is in.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:33, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Am I meant to update it myself?--TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:15, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- It was 1 per 3 days, I checked. Frankly, I'm not bothered either way, and now that we have a point, I'm reluctant to lose it.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:09, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- If I recall, the penalty was -1 for every 5 hours in AHMH3. Or something like that. I don't fully recall what I came up with. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 18:49, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- I'm not really in favour... When we let Natasha into the third Malton Manhunt, it was like... an hour late. Fair enough, we said, and no-more. But this contest has properly started nearly 18 hours ago and it's bending the rules somewhat out of shape to let them in now. Also, the prescribed penalty is barely a scratch in this 'team' game. Personally, I think we should say no, sorry to whoever it is that wants in, but people have had weeks to prepare... --BOSCH 18:23, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Yeah, it's somebody new. The above team members may well disappear from the list.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 18:16, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- If it was one of your already named members who's just turning up late, then it's ok far as I'm concerned. If not, and it's someone new wishing to join, then yeah, -1. ~ Kempy “YaketyYak” | ◆◆◆ | CAPD | 16:57, 3 October 2010 (BST)
Quick unrelated notion. Make the scoreboard an actual scoreboard: rank the groups on actual points rather than alphabetically. --Thadeous Oakley 18:38, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Click the button under rank and the table reorders itself. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 18:41, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- lolirdumb --Thadeous Oakley 18:55, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Back on the subject of the latecomer, I'm sorry but I can't agree with this either. I'm really not making a big deal about the name tag thing but this would be the second time the rules were bent and the event isn't even 24 hours old. But like Bosch said, everyone has had weeks to decide if they wanted to participate in this. This person can always join the next event and that'll be fair on everyone playing in this manhunt. Petite Fille 19:25, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Yeah, it's cool, I've already told them they can't participate. But the group name thing was never really part of the rules. It was more to help the RG not think we were PKers (which most of us are).--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 19:33, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- Back on the subject of the latecomer, I'm sorry but I can't agree with this either. I'm really not making a big deal about the name tag thing but this would be the second time the rules were bent and the event isn't even 24 hours old. But like Bosch said, everyone has had weeks to decide if they wanted to participate in this. This person can always join the next event and that'll be fair on everyone playing in this manhunt. Petite Fille 19:25, 3 October 2010 (BST)
- lolirdumb --Thadeous Oakley 18:55, 3 October 2010 (BST)