Category talk:Historical Groups

Obtaining Historical Status

A policy is in place which outlines the method to attain historical status.

Groups must no longer actively contribute to the game. A nomination should be made on Category talk:Historical Groups. Within two weeks of a nomination, the group must be approved by 2/3 of the voters, and have a minimum of 15 voters for a nomination to pass. The only allowable votes are Yes and No. Groups that pass will be added to the category as described below. Groups must allow a week to pass between nominations. Groups must allow 4 months in between when the group disbands and when they can be nominated for Historical Status. (Note: Only for Malton-based groups)

Nominations for Historical Status

When nominating a group, please add a note to Template:Wiki News and add {{HistoricalGroupVoting}} to the top of the group's page. Also, please add {{HistoricalVotingRules}} under the group's application for historical status.

New Nominations

Channel 4 News Team

I'm still a little confused as to why I'm the one to do this, having Mr. Burgundy or another iconic member come back to do it would have been a fitting end for the group. But anyway, reports from one of its older members confirm that the group has been without activity for quite some time. According to forum and wiki activity the group has been inactive for many months, well past the 4 month waiting period for historical group nominations.

Again, I really don't know what to say about C4NT because I assume that if you're anyone who's anyone you already know what there is to know. They were led by the hilarious Ron Burgundy till 2008, probably one of the only real legendary survivors of UD, and have had a huge influence and impact in UD's earlier history, most famously the Battle of Blackmore, and also the first, second and third sieges of Caiger Mall. As a new ~2007 user, my bedtime lullabies were stories of Ron Burgundy and his quests for Glorious Battle, something I'm sure many of today's users can relate to. I only joined C4NT for a short period of time but in that small amount I had a ball, they were great players and funny roleplayers.

So here is the nomination I guess. Again, not really sure if I should add anything, since I'm assuming anyone who's been here for more than a few months will recognise them as historical in a splitsecond, but if you have more to add just add it below here I guess, or in your vote. I really liked C4NT and it's sad to see it go but It'll also be really fitting to finally see them go into Historical Groups (hopefully).

Note: I'm also aware that C4NT are still on the stats page too, with about 10 members. I think these may be stragglers similar to those who still had the group tag despite inactivity from the core group members, like when say The Dead's voting went forth. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 03:34, 24 June 2011 (BST)

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a moderator.

The only valid voting sections are Yes and No. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Yes

1. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 03:30, 24 June 2011 (BST)
2. I HAVE PERFECT FUCKING HAIR AND CLASSY FUCKING SUITS!--User:Sexualharrison03:51, 24 June 2011 (bst)
3. BY ODIN'S RAVEN! – Textbook historical group. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 04:00, 24 June 2011 (BST)
4. 1 lemon 2 lemon 3 melon. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:27, 24 June 2011 (BST)
5. As Revenant.--Penguinpyro 05:28, 24 June 2011 (BST)
6. I once met Ron Burgundy. My god, his hair... I still weep to remember it. Mordred 07:25, 24 June 2011 (BST)
7. Essential --Papa Moloch 09:39, 24 June 2011 (BST)
8. Mmm, I just burnt my tongue. --Rosslessness 10:11, 24 June 2011 (BST)
9. Pretty much the essential survivor experience. I do miss eating them though. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 10:25, 24 June 2011 (BST)
10. Speedy Delete Crit 1. -- Spiderzed█ 12:20, 24 June 2011 (BST)
11. Duh, I really can't believe we're having to ask whether or not this group deserves historical status or not. --Ash  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 12:35, 24 June 2011 (BST)
12. Who? --Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 16:17, 24 June 2011 (BST)
13. Vouch Promote the CUNTs. ~ _{16:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)}
14. I will miss the fashion news. --QBee 16:47, 24 June 2011 (BST)
15. Only historical because of their gross abuse of copyright violations.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 17:22, 24 June 2011 (BST)
16. I shot at Ron Burgundy once, but he was protected by bears --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 18:41, 24 June 2011 (BST)

No

1. NO but only because they deserve to be in a category of their own..."LEGENDARY" --Honestmistake 08:06, 24 June 2011 (BST)

Recent Nominations

• Columbine Kids - Failed

Previous Discussions

There are 3 archives for this page.

General Discussion

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Succeeded

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Voting Failed

	Things Best Forgotten
	This Category talk page has an archive.

Historical Groups Use Discussion

just a question why and how did the roftwood assault force become historical?--User:Sexualharrison04:16, 23 June 2011 (bst)

here's the vote. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 05:45, 23 June 2011 (BST)

man did it squeak by. must have been when i was inactive for a few months.--User:Sexualharrison06:06, 23 June 2011 (bst)