User talk:Krazy Monkey: Difference between revisions
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Naooooooo D:< {{MandatoryGravy}} (and also why is my sig suddenly in a weird box? D: --{{User:Dudemeister/Sig}} 19:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | Naooooooo D:< {{MandatoryGravy}} (and also why is my sig suddenly in a weird box? D: --{{User:Dudemeister/Sig}} 19:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Ya == | |||
It's perfectly fine just ask sessa.--[[User:Zink|Zink]] 23:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC){{user:zink/sig}} p.s. you have one confusing talk page. | |||
=Do not put anything below this header= | =Do not put anything below this header= |
Revision as of 23:26, 12 March 2009
Do not put anything above this headerNEW STUFF RIGHT AT THE BOTTOM! February 09Historical votingSince when did unsigned votes count? (Not that it matters) If they do count can I have the unsigned For vote that was struck returned? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
A/DYuo should haev at least waited until the end of the day to delete that image. Yuo were a few hours early. :) --Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 23:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
UraniumBOMBS--/~Rakuen~\Talk I Still Love Grim 02:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Use itNaooooooo D:<
(and also why is my sig suddenly in a weird box? D: --Mrs FlibbleTalk 19:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC) YaIt's perfectly fine just ask sessa.--Zink 23:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Old Model New Parts , Zink Talk █ █ █ p.s. you have one confusing talk page. Do not put anything below this headerNew posts go directly above this bit hi-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Thats why I put it up. I'm a bit busy right now, so have at it.--Suicidal Angel, Help needed? 15:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC) questionHi, I just have a quick question. twice now, I've noticed you post while you where (in your own words) "drunk". do you think this is a good idea? it really doesnt seem smart to me for someone with sysop powers to edit the wiki under these conditions. what do you think?--'BPTmz 07:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
laters dudeI'm off. Thanks for the demotion! --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 22:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC) SuggestionI noticed that you changed the page 10mfh/roster to 10 minutes from hell/roster as it is a subpage of our group page, 10 minutes from hell. This is fine, however - you did not correct the link to the roster page when you changed the name resulting in a dead link on our main page and a subpage that was not linked to. While I understand (and presume) that this error was unintentional, could you please be more careful in the future? (Note:I've corrected the link, so it is no longer an issue.)--Lois Millard 13:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Honest's Promotion BidTime's up. He has quite a number of vouches, however quite a few people are unsure, and a few strongly against. I personally think he would be an asset, however community being unsure, and his own lack confidence in his suitability mean that he would probably be better off not being promoted at this time. Even if it's just to give some time to think about what he has to offer, and whether he actually wants the job before reapplying -- boxy talk • teh rulz 22:46 13 February 2009 (BST)
This caseSome guy thinks it's dead, as there hasn't been any edits for a while. Going to get it started again? (I've let all the people being arbirated know.) Linkthewindow Talk 05:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
March 09DanversbankCheese, can you help a pretty Irishman out? These DAM fellows (as far as I can tell, it's one or two male tweeners) have gone hog wild on the Danversbank page. Can they just trash the DRRP's long-standing barricade plan and implement a much lamer one just like that? I don't know what I can do here, but I'm not too keen on these newb wankers pissing on a group that's been in the burb for going on 3 years. Thanks mucho. --Paddy Dignam 19:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi me!!It looks like you can ban people for bizarrely random periods of time. =) -- Page Blanker 23:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |