User talk:Boxy

Main Talk • Locations • Suggest • Signature • Templates Navigation • Playpen POV Sug • Image Archive Please read first! Don't worry about keeping to the relevant sections, just add new subjects at the top, I'll move 'em around when I get to it. New Stuff June 2013 Question answered Yea... on my talk page... after 5 years. --ConndrakaTAZM CFT 05:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Broken Redirect Hey there Boxy, this page showed up on the Broken Redirects-list while I was patrolling: User:Boxy/Sandbox/UHUB. Please consider putting it up for deletion and help keep the wiki clean ;) PB&J 12:59, 19 June 2013 (BST) I just deleted it as a broken redirect due to a page move, which doesn't need documenting (as it's a scheduled deletion). Thanks for pointing that out -- boxy 15:13, 21 June 2013 (BST) Great Fire banner Hey Boxy, I was wondering why you removed the ALiM banner from Great Fire of 1912? There was actually a discussion about the banner's presence when the article was up for FAs, and a discussion on Nallan's talk page concluded that the banner should stay. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 17:40, 2 June 2013 (BST) They don't own the page, any more than Hagnat owns the BIC, which he created. They can arby me if they still care -- boxy 22:15, 2 June 2013 (BST) Cool. Just wanted to make sure you acted with awareness of the history of the issue. Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 01:03, 3 June 2013 (BST) He totally hates that banner. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 21:58, 3 June 2013 (BST) It's better than it used to be, but still doesn't belong on backstory pages -- boxy 03:21, 4 June 2013 (BST) Thanks Thanks for categorizing. It's one of those things I'm not very good at and usually forget to do. Any chance you're planning on attending the Big Bash? We could always use another zombie in the mix. ;) —Aichon— 03:07, 2 June 2013 (BST) I actually did wander on over to buttonville, after reading the BB4 page. Will see how it goes -- boxy 03:41, 2 June 2013 (BST) May 2013 Regarding this I bet it's an extension I installed in Chrome the other day. It looks like all of the mangled parts were areas that included numbers of some sort, and the extension may have tried to replace them as part of what it does. Thanks for catching that. I wasn't aware of the fact that it could even do something like that. —Aichon— 04:54, 21 May 2013 (BST) April 2013 Sorry Sorry, I forgot. I will try to sign my comments in the future.Lpha 23:58, 19 April 2013 (BST) Sorry to interrupt... Could you please look at Sexualharrison's vote as well? In my opinion, "Kill because fuck you" is just as inane as "because, kittens". Thank you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpha (talk • contribs) 21:55, 10 April 2013. Boxy struck Ross' vote because it was unjustified. "Because, kittens" doesn't mean anything and was intentionally random. SH's vote is far from random or meaningless, and was clearly made in response to a discussion you started on his talk page. Besides which, it's common courtesy to take a personal dispute up with that person directly before trying to involve figures of authority. Have you considered simply talking to Harrison yourself? He clearly saw your initial request as an unnecessary one that made no sense, so he took offense. Perhaps if you could explain why you requested that in the first place, he may be more amenable. Or you may want to take the high ground and simply apologize for any offense that may have been taken, even though it was not your intent to have offended him. —Aichon— 23:21, 10 April 2013 (BST) this is going to be good.--User:Sexualharrison23:43, 10 April 2013 Well, I already had a look at it, when you brought it up on Aichon's talk page, and posted this; boxy said: If you'll notice, he did give a justification in his original vote, to wit: "Meh", which translates to "this is a bland and uninspiring suggestion, and I could either vote keep or kill, so don't give me any shit about my vote, or it may change". Or were those just the voices in my head? -- boxy 10:32, 8 April 2013 (BST) Surely you could have worked out what his justification was for that responce. You read his original vote, you chose to give him shit about it, even after being told not to worry about such trivialities -- boxy 03:48, 11 April 2013 (BST) Wah! Save me sysops!!!!111one --User:Sexualharrison22:10, 11 April 2013 I still have more keep votes than kill votes, you know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lpha (talk • contribs) at an unknown time. Are you aware that you need a 2/3 majority to have your suggestion marked as Peer Reviewed? And that you're only one vote away from losing that? Don't count your chickens before they hatch. —Aichon— 01:26, 13 April 2013 (BST) I think it's cute that you think I care -- boxy 03:27, 13 April 2013 (BST) I know right. guess I'll continue to grief you in-game than and you asked for it too.--User:Sexualharrison07:01, 13 April 2013 Missed Talk Pages One of your recent mass deletion requests couldn't be carried out: The Shadows of Hope still have a group page, so their talk page isn't a scheduled deletion. -- Spiderzed█ 15:31, 7 April 2013 (BST) Good thing I didn't do them myself, then -- boxy 22:55, 7 April 2013 (BST) Clearly this is a conspiracy, if only Funt hadn't run off in fear of the oligarchy. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 05:31, 8 April 2013 (BST) I miss the old Mod Conspiracy days. When are you going to become a crat, so you can boot me out and give me a reason to revive the wild paranoia that lurks just beneath the surface? -- boxy 10:43, 8 April 2013 (BST) What happened to that anyway? Even I voted for Karek, and my vote counts as three! A ZOMBIE ANT 15:14, 8 April 2013 (BST) The same thing that always does, the shadow proclamation. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 16:15, 8 April 2013 (BST) You can have my seat. I don't want it and won't seek it, come next election. —Aichon— 16:32, 8 April 2013 (BST) I'm really indifferent to the whole process. I'm basically just here to kill time. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 17:15, 8 April 2013 (BST) People, Karek, there to kill people. You'll never be a good crat without the murderous urge. A ZOMBIE ANT 22:18, 8 April 2013 (BST) March 2013 Very Old Character Looking to Play Again Hello, my name is now Mikhail1979, but I used to be MikhailA, director of Lejnair Corp. and what not. It's been six years, but I suddenly have the itch to play again. Unfortuantely, I have since lost my passwords to my wiki account as well at the four characters I had in the game. I'm hoping you or some of the other sysops or even Kevan could help me out with this. I just would like to play again, for old times sake. If you can help, just let me know. I'll even provide necessary info if needed. Thanks!--Mikhail1979 22:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC) December 2012 Damn it That is all.--SA 09:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC) October 2012 Loads of Crat Stuff Anyway, at the end of the week there's going to be another 2 evaluations, and then you're up for crat. So try and be around ok? --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 16:30, 4 October 2012 (BST) Yo, I'll make decisions on both A/RE's tomorrow. Unless you appear. Just thought I'd give you a heads up.--Ross Less Ness Enter Stranger... 16:41, 9 October 2012 (BST) I'm easy, either way, with teh general. He's pretty well inactive, atm, but he tends to be that way, and then comes back, and helps out, without stirring shit up. Rev seems to be doing enough to keep his place -- boxy 14:03, 10 October 2012 (BST) I'm with demote. Not even a squeak during the bid, even after talk page mentions. Revs fine though. I'll do some things tonight, once the week is officially up. Welcome back .--Ross Less Ness Enter Stranger... 15:04, 10 October 2012 (BST) August 2012 Karek A/RE Discuss?--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 18:40, 26 September 2012 (BST) DISCUSS??--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 18:59, 28 September 2012 (BST) Yeah...I don't envy you guys right now. :-/ —Aichon— 19:49, 28 September 2012 (BST) Surely thats normal. Also, Im nixing slr bid as he fails loads of criteria and stuff.--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:35, 28 September 2012 (BST) Anyway, I'll give box until the first, or make a random decision on my own. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:46, 28 September 2012 (BST) Right. You've got 3 hours, otherwise I'm ruling on my own.--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 16:10, 1 October 2012 (BST) It's funny cause normally I don't look at the bid page for a week and it goes pretty well. I respond to DDR this time and meh. Either way I'm not put out whatever the decision is and I'm pretty aware of the whys. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:07, 29 September 2012 (BST) To paraphrase To save time, in the upcoming Aichon promotion thing, I have no problem with his promotion. --RossWHO????ness 11:42, 22 August 2012 (BST) Yes, agreed -- boxy 13:48, 23 August 2012 (BST) Talking of which, there's a re-evaluation due in 6 hours. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 10:42, 1 September 2012 (BST) Stuff I really should archive June 2012 This User:Boxy/Sandbox Broken Redirects! --Rosslessness 20:10, 22 June 2012 (BST) ... the fuck was I even doing there? lol. Cleared out -- boxy 09:44, 24 June 2012 (BST) Fun yer no fun!--User:Sexualharrison16:30, 14 June 2012 You should totally take me to arbies -- boxy 22:31, 14 June 2012 (BST) if only i had the time.--User:Sexualharrison23:45, 14 June 2012 May 2012 Promotions Just letting you know Karloth Vois's promotion bid has passed the two week discussion period and is due for bureaucrat review. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:03, 22 May 2012 (BST) Um...Just so you know, Rev, as per policy, new opinions can continue to be added to the bid until the 'crats announce their decision. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 13:23, 22 May 2012 (BST) NO. REALLY? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 14:04, 22 May 2012 (BST) Theoreticallly, a bid can go on for an infinite amount of tine. Theoretically. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:52, 22 May 2012 (BST) like my counting thread over on the NMC?--User:Sexualharrison15:34, 22 May 2012 Yeah even before that addition to the guidelines i remember one of Wan Yao's bid going for a month at least :/ DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:59, 22 May 2012 (BST) Was that the one where he didn't officially accept for nearly 2 weeks, and the bids went from the time they were accepted (and had the required number of vouches)? -- boxy 06:53, 25 May 2012 (BST) So, vois, my answer is "facial hair", and to pre empt future discussions, shortround shrugs sure. --Rosslessness 17:15, 22 May 2012 (BST) Shorty should do alright -- boxy 06:53, 25 May 2012 (BST) Axe Obvious re evaluation is obvious. --Rosslessness 18:31, 9 May 2012 (BST) Indeed -- boxy 09:02, 10 May 2012 (BST) Much Love <3 --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 13:41, 7 May 2012 (BST) Agreed. Your sheer awesomeness is unparalleled. -- †  talk ? f.u. 14:00, 7 May 2012 (BST) April 2012 You're awesome For all you do to make this wiki a success, I salute you. Keep doing what you do because you rock at it. --TheBardofOld 01:00, 15 April 2012 (BST) I'm far to lazy and inactive to be described as awesome (any more }. Just a grumpy old man, sitting on his porch, with his shotgun, occasionally shouting, "git orf mai lawn!" -- boxy 01:10, 15 April 2012 (BST) But, if you're who you claim to be, then you must be Clint Eastwood and for that, you're awesome. Seriously, you are. Never doubt. --TheBardofOld 01:12, 15 April 2012 (BST) Not Clint, maybe a co-star though -- boxy 03:24, 15 April 2012 (BST) Awwww XD --TheBardofOld 03:28, 15 April 2012 (BST) Mis I assume it's a no? --Rosslessness 09:30, 8 April 2012 (BST) ? --Rosslessness 08:58, 10 April 2012 (BST) Hurry the fuck up. You are already 5 days late on demoting both Mis and Vapor, closing the VB case, and banning several spambots. Generaloberst 20:14, 10 April 2012 (BST) You know what? Gimme another eight months of unused power just to piss this guy off. 23:44, 10 April 2012 (BST) I agree with man, hell, the shitbrain almost makes me want to come back for the sole reason of driving him off the wiki. Not because it's right, but because I could. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:08, 11 April 2012 (BST) Do you honestly mean that? I mean, you're one of the few sysops that I saw as not very biased. If you really ment that then I'm quite shocked. Generaloberst 01:22, 11 April 2012 (BST) Vouch. ~ 00:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Vouchx2--User:Sexualharrison00:59, 11 April 2012 Oh! Me too! Vouch, Vouch, Vouch, Vouch. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:18, 11 April 2012 (BST) Yes. Vouch. -- Cheese 13:31, 11 April 2012 (BST) Box, I'll set a weeks deadline on this, or otherwise make my own decision. Grazi. --Rosslessness 12:54, 11 April 2012 (BST) Does that mean you will demote him tomorrow (when he's a week late), or in a week? Generaloberst 13:13, 11 April 2012 (BST) Shakes head. --Rosslessness 13:26, 11 April 2012 (BST) Sorry about that. Yeah, sure, demote him... or keep him, just to piss off the nazi. Either way is good -- boxy 10:01, 12 April 2012 (BST) LMFAO, and you still claim to be unbiased?? Generaloberst 12:00, 12 April 2012 (BST) Did I make that claim? I've always maintained a healthy bias against people who just come here to be arseclowns, trolls or vandals -- boxy 12:52, 12 April 2012 (BST) March 2012 I feel for you Listen, we gotta talk. You and I both know that I'm actually one of the finest warriors in Malton. Also, there are not many groups stronger than Nazi Zombies either. Perhaps only the RRF is stronger right now. During Operation Naaldloos we have defeated a group of about 250 survivors with less than 4 dozen of men. In the Blitz we're taking on 350 survivors with even less men, now that Fascist Italian has shown his true colors. I don't see how these things are "Nazi propaganda". I'm just stating fact. So leave my pages alone and do something useful. I'm taking warfare on Urban Dead to a whole new level. And that level is called Sitzkrieg. Just a small step for a man, but an enormous step, für das Vaterland. Generaloberst 16:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Lol. My army of level one members with no xp at all created one after another is the strongest group in Malton. --Rosslessness 17:22, 17 March 2012 (UTC) There we go again "yes but you are just a zerger". You don't even know my ingame name. Perhaps I'm not even wearing the tag. I can be everyone in Malton. Generaloberst 18:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I'm sorry General, I never claimed you were zerging. I was merely commenting on the make up of the group you associate with. I believe we're talking about Zombie Nazis? I feel I have a right to call several of their members level one players with little or no Xp, created one after another over the course of only a few minutes. In fact I have. Here are four examples. You're getting a little obsessed that everyone thinks you're a zerger. --Rosslessness 19:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Ok so someone has multiple accounts within Nazi Zombies. How is that a problem? It was funny how at the time Corn and "Zyckde" both had multiple accounts within their group. Corn was then constantly called "zerger" and "PK-er" (both ingame as on the wiki), though what Zyckde did was considered ok. That is what propaganda is. Generaloberst 10:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) if you're noting propagandas affectiveness on the weak then why are you so goddamn shit at it, you spout more of it than you do vowels DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Learn English and learn to read. Not propaganda from my side. Generaloberst 14:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC) you spend more time having tantrums about jews than you spend time breathing. If you actually legitimately believe that you don't use any sort of progaganda and that if one thinks you do he needs to learn english then you are literally the most retarded person who's ever been on this wiki. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) bitch got owned? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC) When you create a number of pages like that, claiming to be glossary terms, but then proceed to fill the pages with group specific images and references to your own group and it's greatness, it becomes clear that they are nothing more than group propaganda/trolling. And they'll be moved -- boxy 21:48, 17 March 2012 (BST) Yeah, and if other (non-Aryan) pages are made like Jihad tactics including fitting images then it's all ok suddenly. What you just said occurs on the wiki all the time. It really isn't anything specific for Nazi Zombies. Just stop being jealous that someone invented a tactic you wasn't able to come up with and go outside to find some friends. People wouldn't bully you all the time and you wouldnt be such a cunt. Generaloberst 10:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC) if you legit think that jihad tactics is the same kettle of fish as the shitskrieg page where it matters then you are beyond help. i have no problem with either but just saying DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Lol. Why was corn called a zerger when he was zerging. That's an amazing question. --Rosslessness 12:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Corn wasn't zerging, corn had multiple accounts in the same group. Generaloberst 14:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Ah, I see how that could lead to us having differing opinions on this. Which alts are his? I could probably get some of them off the zerg list, if they aren't in the same burb. --Rosslessness 16:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Damn, I was looking for this quote for ages. Completely pointless now. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:41, 28 September 2012 (BST) How does the page that you referenced deal with my criticism of your pages being little more than group propaganda? I see no group links at all on that page. Perhaps you were expecting me to have other objections, and just argued against that strawman? -- boxy 13:41, 18 March 2012 (BST) even more so he is using a joke tactic as his example. pure genuis --User:Sexualharrison13:49, 18 March 2012 Jihad tactics shows images of Jihadists. The pinata page has links to Maltonian Inquisition or however you spell the name. What you call 'propaganda' (I call it fact, or in case of images decoration) is all over the wiki. Generaloberst 14:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Bureaucrat Elections Hey, Boxy, I've started the Bureaucrat election for your seat. I hope you don't mind, but it was a day overdue, so I just did the leg work. Feel free to correct anything I've done wrong. :P --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 11:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC) The system is designed so that anyone can start the process, so that's fine and dandy -- boxy 10:57, 16 March 2012 (BST) Just so you know, Box-man, you can keep your seat. This is not some crazy plan to get into a close race with Boxy for the seat just to withdraw at the very last minute to ensure all my votes don't count, leaving absolutely no time for anyone who voted for me to change their vote, thus ensuring Boxy pretty much wins by default. Nope, definitely not some crazy plan like that. I'm just not that interested right now, but it is nice to see who is willing to trust me with such a role. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 11:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Remember me? Because I remember you and will be very sad if you've forgotten me. --Mikalos209 02:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC) February 2012 yer sliping (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 03:54 . . (+93) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Slambuts: ) YOINK!--User:Sexualharrison12:08, 28 February 2012 (bst) Just because I didn't change the edit summary, doesn't mean I didn't yoink it, but good, regardless . Getting bored yet, tilting at windmills? -- boxy 12:19, 28 February 2012 (BST) 156 people like this comment. i've been playing this game for over 5 years. you tell me. also Don Quixote can kiss my arse!--User:Sexualharrison12:48, 28 February 2012 (bst) -- boxy 19:35, 28 February 2012 (BST) --User:Sexualharrison19:45, 28 February 2012 (bst) (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 04:40 . . (+91) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Scamboxs: ) --User:Sexualharrison12:19, 29 February 2012 (bst) Congrats, after 3 months of trying, you finally got one through! Time to stop, and be bask in the greatness of your glorious victory? -- boxy 00:30, 1 March 2012 (BST) i will only accept unconditional surrender--User:Sexualharrison04:02, 1 March 2012 (bst) and the torch is Passed--User:Sexualharrison13:02, 6 March 2012 Get shorty! -- boxy 01:56, 7 March 2012 (BST) you are a heartless bastard and I hope you choke on that beer. another great year!--User:Sexualharrison11:44, 7 December 2013 Hope you had a happy Hanukkah, or whatever other imaginary bullshit you happen believe in. Cheers -- boxy 11:40, 8 December 2013 (BST) Archives Location Editing Locations talk archive: Suggestions Suggestion talk archive: Moderation Moderation talk archive Editing teh Wiki Editing talk archive: General Talk General talk archive: