Talk:Grimmies

Opening Discussion

i'm am opening this up to editing. have at it.--User:Sexualharrison15:02, 30 May 2011 (bst)

You looking for positive ones as well? or this meant to be just for lols?--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:07, 30 May 2011 (BST)\

we can't have both? and isn't everything always about the lols. --User:Sexualharrison15:09, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Oh of course it is, how could i forget --^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:15, 30 May 2011 (BST)

thad is going to clean up!--User:Sexualharrison15:33, 30 May 2011 (bst)

I've got that invasion of privacy award nailed!--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 15:53, 30 May 2011 (BST)

organization?

should we open up voting on which awards to use? The panel will decide on awards. public nominations and voting with be accepted with links. panel will have final say
How many categories should we cap at? 5? 10?
and when voting we should have them provide a link? or can that be added in later?
Panel Nominations on the talk page? --User:Sexualharrison16:08, 30 May 2011 (bst)

Your panel should probably pick which awards to use, rather than having a public vote. I don't see why there should only be 5 awards, just do as many as you can think of. And I don't understand your other questions. Btw, will there be nominations for each category, or just the panel deciding?--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 18:20, 30 May 2011 (BST)

i'm not sure. i think we should do public voting on the nominations. i guess in the same format as the MMAs?--User:Sexualharrison13:57, 31 May 2011 (bst)

eligible as long you were promoted as a sysop no matter how short lived your term was.--User:Sexualharrison14:20, 31 May 2011 (bst)

Templates

Thats what needed here. --Rosslessness 16:44, 30 May 2011 (BST)

Why create templates when witty images do the job?

~ _{18:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)}

get cracking!--User:Sexualharrison18:47, 31 May 2011 (bst)

I can probably make some trophy art based on the categories. ~ _{15:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)}

hey when the fuck do i get my trophy

seriously gimme my award so i can go --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 18:30, 30 May 2011 (BST)

u can share 'shortest time as a sysop' award with amazing :P --hagnat 04:48, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Like anyone else on this wiki could outclass me for "Best Burn", seriously --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 05:04, 31 May 2011 (BST)

i remember i was just a young UD player when you got demoted :P sadily, couldn't appreciate your work back then... i remember i used to fear the Red-eye Republic and the RRF wasnt even in petro's mind... git out mah lawn!!! --hagnat 05:25, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Nobody appreciates my work now. Except for my boys, of course, but they don't count for anything apparently. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 08:16, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Whoa, whoa, whoa. SHARE? ... Okay, Katthew. How long were you in office? I think I had about 24 hours. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 06:34, 31 May 2011 (BST)

I had a week or two, but I was demoted for being a girl so maybe I should win something for that? --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 08:16, 31 May 2011 (BST)

You could have the 'more girly sysop'... but so could Gnome XD --hagnat 12:24, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Am I missing something, because looking at the User Rights Log the implication is that Katthew is still a sysop.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 23:43, 31 May 2011 (BST)

My demodding was pretty much a farce. No misconduct page back then, no nothin'. Some dudes just said "omg she said mean things what a bitch" and I said "wait wha" and Kevan decided it was less hassle to just deop me than to actually verify any of the claims. I'm not surprised it hasn't been logged, but rest assured that I am still not a sysop (on account of certain people, now long since gone, being afraid of me). --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 23:53, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Hmm. Still strange that there are no logs. I think it would be slightly epic if you'd been hiding op powers for 5 years and then suddenly started using them. So many people would just shit bricks.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 00:36, 1 June 2011 (BST)

There are logs, if you know where to look. As I recall, Katthew was sysop for about a week, as such, I believe Amazing pretty much has shortest sysop sewn up. He was one for what, two days? Less? --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 01:40, 1 June 2011 (BST)

The log shows that Katthew moved from user level none to none, with a +sysop as a comment. The log must have been purged with some other records of this wiki history. --hagnat 14:00, 1 June 2011 (BST)

If you look carefully, every sysop in our early wiki history got promoted from none to none, and all the later ones got promoted from none to administrators. Kevan prolly changed the sysop reference somewhere in a wiki update, which is causing katthew record to be unable to show her move from none to a sysopy category --hagnat 14:05, 1 June 2011 (BST)

No surprises on the 'easiest option'. Kevan is a bit like water, oft taking the path of least resistance. I was demoted for performing a (at the time) standard SysOp action, but being kicked out for not having a dong does seem harsher. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 07:50, 11 June 2011 (BST)

I'll take the most inept, most stupid~sop mistake and best drunken (even though that i might have to share with zar) --hagnat 04:47, 31 May 2011 (BST)

i was hoping you would judge the event also. and i'm pretty sure you are a sure win for some sort of shiny award or knish.--User:Sexualharrison05:53, 31 May 2011 (bst)

I'd be a poor fit, considering how little I think of the sysops on the wiki. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 08:16, 31 May 2011 (BST)

I think that's the point.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 11:13, 31 May 2011 (BST)

yon is correct. everyone can vote. active syops cannot be on the panel. ex ones can. --User:Sexualharrison12:31, 31 May 2011 (bst)

i heartily await this -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 06:31, 31 May 2011 (BST)

hey kath! links or it did not happen--User:Sexualharrison15:38, 27 June 2011 (bst)

The Grim Award

any thoughts?--User:Sexualharrison12:40, 31 May 2011 (bst)

Id give it to grim. --Rosslessness 13:11, 31 May 2011 (BST)

I dunno. Maybe the "most notorious" op to have since demoted from the position. sept grim would win it. maybe most notorious or memorable besides grim -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:16, 31 May 2011 (BST)

The most notorious other than Grim Award? --Rosslessness 14:25, 31 May 2011 (BST)

possibles

• Most Passive
• Most shallow/superficial
• Biggest Wikicat?
• Biggest Grudge?
• Most hated
• Most loved (lol)
• Most ignorant
• Most persuasive

?? Just throwing shit out at everyone from the top of my head. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:15, 31 May 2011 (BST)

move them to the mainpage big boi--User:Sexualharrison14:17, 31 May 2011 (bst)

For sure. I'll also add "Best text-wall" if that's cool. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:18, 31 May 2011 (BST)

open page. edit away. i just put it in my userspace to get it started. once i have the ideas and ground rules down I want to move it a public space.--User:Sexualharrison14:22, 31 May 2011 (bst)

well i guess there should be s specific award for each serving sysop. that way everybody is a winner \o/ --User:Sexualharrison14:25, 31 May 2011 (bst)

Id break passive into a couple of awards, laziest, and most flame resistant. --Rosslessness 14:26, 31 May 2011 (BST)

Or something like: Most Necromantic. "The Op who had the longest break from the wiki and came back from the dead to do Op work." --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 00:23, 1 June 2011 (BST)

The Cat Award (Longest Term As Bureaucrat)

won't Keven win this automatically? or will it go to a actually a person. not some deity that keeps messing with the search rates?--User:Sexualharrison14:16, 31 May 2011 (bst)

If the award was used, then Urbandead and Keven should proberly be excluded--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 14:18, 31 May 2011 (BST)

This

Loads if ideas for awards here. --Rosslessness 14:32, 31 May 2011 (BST)

not as funny thoUser:Sexualharrison15:45, 31 May 2011 (bst)

Only in a Grim bringing up whether users are trusted way. --Rosslessness 15:51, 31 May 2011 (BST)

pretty 5th grade and petty--User:Sexualharrison17:03, 31 May 2011 (bst)

The best part are the "Yes" votes for Conndraka. -- Spiderzed█ 23:25, 31 May 2011 (BST)

That was when Conndraka was on the outs. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 00:19, 1 June 2011 (BST)

I plum forgot about 73--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 01:58, 1 June 2011 (BST)

Name

This award ceremony needs a good name...like the Grammies or the Webbies. I can only think of the Opies (see here). Thoughts? ~ _{15:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)}

blah too early to be looking at the most famous and ugly ginger on the planet. umm sure fine.--User:Sexualharrison15:25, 1 June 2011 (bst)

The Grimmies? --Rosslessness 21:13, 1 June 2011 (BST)

^this--User:Sexualharrison21:19, 1 June 2011 (bst)

Just a heads up

The table you have doesn't include all of the sysops ever, because Kev and Odd promoted some before PM was introduced.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 15:41, 1 June 2011 (BST)

well fix that shit!--User:Sexualharrison21:18, 1 June 2011 (bst)

HEY HEY CAN I HAS PERSONAL AWARD OR SOME SHIT?

derp--||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:23, 1 June 2011 (BST)

only if you take that goon sig and shove it up you're ass :P--User:Sexualharrison21:25, 1 June 2011 (bst)

Already have, awwww yeah!--||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:32, 1 June 2011 (BST)

i still hate you.. meet me in the spam thread.--User:Sexualharrison22:47, 1 June 2011 (bst)

What spam thread? The count thread? That thing still exists? Hell, I don't know my account their anymore anyway. :|--||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 22:57, 1 June 2011 (BST)

ahhh my eyes! all that worthless code.. what the hell was i gonna say.. oh yeah the counting theard. i think it's still going I haven't been to the forum in a while.--User:Sexualharrison23:41, 1 June 2011 (bst)

voting

so should we begin? whats better for everyone IRC or UDWiki?--User:Sexualharrison14:49, 2 June 2011 (bst)

Thought we were still in planning stage. I'm going to put together some statistics for the bids at some point this week (hopefully today). ~ _{15:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)}

we have to consider some of the judges attention spans. but sure i can wait.--User:Sexualharrison17:16, 2 June 2011 (bst)

TBH those concerning the bid don't really need judging. They're based on statistics and really its up to you weather they're actually used for awards. So don't let me hold it up. I'll put together a table with op statistics and you can decide weather you actually want to use them sans judging. ~ _{17:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)}

UDWiki is fine for me. Then people can comment on our votes. :D --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 22:52, 2 June 2011 (BST)

i'm still pretty new at this. so what do you guys/girl think will be a good format?--User:Sexualharrison00:33, 3 June 2011 (bst)

Huh

Sysops awards huh? Why didn't anyone tell me about this shit? I wanna judge!--||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:41, 2 June 2011 (BST)

you are judging and I did tell you. idiot.--User:Sexualharrison00:31, 3 June 2011 (bst)

Sounds Fun

Not here so often these days but I would be delighted to take part.... one question though: will there be Gin for us judges? --Honestmistake 17:06, 6 June 2011 (BST)

open bar dude!--User:Sexualharrison23:31, 6 June 2011 (bst)

nominees

I have that distinct feeling that one op is missing in the list, but can't lay my fingers on the name... -- Spiderzed█ 20:39, 7 June 2011 (BST)

Urbandead?--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 21:00, 7 June 2011 (BST)

The Rooster! ~ _{21:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)}

and Spiderzed ~ _{21:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)}

We can't include the Rooster, because the Rooster would win them all (except for the bad ones).--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 22:13, 7 June 2011 (BST)

add that cock!--User:Sexualharrison22:41, 7 June 2011 (bst)

That's what she said.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 22:29, 8 June 2011 (BST)

well should we start nominating?

anyone have any thoughts on the format?--User:Sexualharrison02:55, 8 June 2011 (bst)

now--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:52, 13 June 2011 (BST)

okay? and start us off than--User:Sexualharrison18:13, 13 June 2011 (bst)

You wanting a nomination for every award we have avliable?--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 18:17, 13 June 2011 (BST)

Cause I had this idea, we should write all our nominations in our own user sapce, then paste a link to the userspace here, to save from clutter--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 18:21, 13 June 2011 (BST)

naw that would make it too hard to track everything. as soon as everything is done we will code it up nice in the main user space. worse comes to worse everyone can make a page under User talk:Sexualharrison/UDWIKI SYSOP AWARDS_YOUR NAME.or something.. sorry just busy with a little vacation. so not spending more time than i have to in front of my computer.--User:Sexualharrison18:33, 13 June 2011 (bst)

I'll have my nominations up for tommorow, got to collate my thoughts--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 19:31, 13 June 2011 (BST)

Ping me when you need my nominations. Less time it's public the less time people get to know them before the results. 17:30, 24 June 2011 (BST)

just post when you are ready. vote on all of them or one. i'm lazy. i was also going to ask if someone can code up the page to look a little better? lets wait like two weeks for everyone to get it together? i'll start sending out messages--User:Sexualharrison17:46, 24 June 2011 (bst)

page design

Did you have a particular theme in mind? I'd be happy to help. See Gabba Gabba, October Bash, Siege on Sears, CORAM orPlay Style for some of my more stylistic contributions to the wiki. ~ _{18:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)}

go nuts i'm an ideas man.--User:Sexualharrison21:38, 24 June 2011 (bst)

I've got an idea in mind now. Will throw it all together at some point this weekend. ~ _{17:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)}

There. Enjoy. ~ _{20:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)}

i'm not liking the colors so much.. it's very "McDonald's/Burger King" how about a burgundy?--User:Sexualharrison14:18, 28 June 2011 (bst)

Well I was going for a red carpet and gold look. Let's see how a burgundy looks. ~ _{14:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)}

Look at the colors below. The top one is what I started with. Everything below is my interpretation of burgundy. Don't forget I am a man and so I automatically convert all colors to just a mix of primary colors. In other words, burgundy to me means purplish-red or reddish-purple. Let me know which one you like. ~ _{14:42, 28 June 2011 (UTC)}

i think the second from the top is a bit more classy, i went and looked at the Oscars and i guess you were going for the red carpet look right? still good job so far man.--User:Sexualharrison15:06, 28 June 2011 (bst)

Thought you might pick that. Yeah I was going for red carpet look but simply because I didn't have any other ideas. I think it could use a bit more content. Like maybe something at the top. Maybe a description of the awards or something. I basically just took the content from the page and stylized it without adding any new content. ~ _{15:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)}

yeh we will get to that later (convince someone funny to write it for me).. and i was hoping more of the community would vote. so far it's just the usual gang. i was looking forward to the dead's responses.--User:Sexualharrison15:15, 28 June 2011 (bst)

also any way to round off the corners?--User:Sexualharrison17:46, 28 June 2011 (bst)

how about losing the trophy all together? i love the grim doll tho? make it goooooooooooooolllllld!--User:Sexualharrison18:07, 28 June 2011 (bst)

Colour-wise the second and third look pretty vile to me. Top is by far my favoured choice but the bottome 2 are not too bad. Should point out that I am colour-blind though and probably not the best judge :) --Honestmistake 00:08, 29 June 2011 (BST)

Category

The fucking page needs a category, but I don't know which one to call it. Therefore I will give it a humorous category (to fit the page) until someone else decides to change it. -- LABIA on the INTERNET ^{Dunell Hills Corpseman} #24 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 08:29, 25 June 2011 (BST)

Nah, that's the right category, unless it gets its own one.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 10:50, 27 June 2011 (BST)