Suggestion:20080120 Remove speaking distance limit

	Spam!
	This suggestion was voted as spam and closed for voting, with 0 keep, 0 kill, and 14 spam votes.

20080120 Remove speaking distance limit

MindBrain 04:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion type
Reworking speaking

Suggestion scope
Everyone

Suggestion description
Would like to see the speaking distance limit removed. So that in squares that have more then 50 players, all of them would see the spoken message.

Voting Section

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, justified, signed, and timestamped. # justification ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above may be struck by any user.

The only valid votes are Keep, Kill, Spam or Dupe. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

Keep Votes

Kill Votes

Spam/Dupe Votes

1. Spam - This was added for a reason. In especially large groups of individuals, chattiness literally brouight the server to a crashing halt. We pulled it at Stanstock. Even got in the game news for it. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 04:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Spam - Everyone being able to interact with everyone else in mobs of hundreds has been shown to be a bad idea. The servers slow down enough as it is, when there's a big push on -- boxy ^{talk • i} 05:19 20 January 2008 (BST)
3. Spam - Bowchikabowwow? hellz no, it was limited for a reason <_< --/~Rakuen~\ 05:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Spam - Unfortunately, doing this would slow down the server even more. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 05:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Spam - Slows server down and unbalances gameplay (biases game towards survivors).  Billy Club Thorton  T!  RR  06:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Spam - Spam. Pun in sentence. Need I say more? ~Ariedartin • Talk • A KS J abt all 07:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
7. Spam - As Grim, kills server.--Karek^maps?! 09:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
8. Spam - And dupe I guess, of what was in the game origonaly. AS above, had to be added due to inane rambling freezing up servers and such.--Seventythree^Talk 09:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Spam - It would be nice, but there's a reason we can't do it. --Pdeq^Talk* 09:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
10. Spaminate! - I don't want more spam! -- John Rubin^{T! ZG} 09:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
11. Spam - it's limited for a reason --~~~~ [talk] 10:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
12. Spam - I'd go insane with the amount of talking! --_Ducis ^Dux_Sloth^Talk 10:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
13. Spam - first ask, why is it limited? The answer is why this is spam. --Funt Solo ^QT 12:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
14. Spam spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam and spam! – Quite lit– oh, wait, no, this is one of them metaphors or somethin', innit? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

---